Notices
Engine Management and ECU Remapping This section is to discuss the various aspects of engine management modification for your Subaru.

ECUtek vs Simtek

Old 16 April 2019, 12:46 PM
  #1  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ECUtek vs Simtek

Afternoon,

I'm currently rebuilding my engine for my 2004 sti and am in two minds whether to run the standard ECU mapped with ecutek or my current spec which is opensource or bute the bullet and change to a simtek, syvecs isn't an option financially.
The car will be running all the supporting mods for around 500bhp.

Thanks.
Old 16 April 2019, 12:54 PM
  #2  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Don't scrimp, if you want it to be reliable then don't try to cut corners. Check out Link as well
Old 16 April 2019, 01:39 PM
  #3  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Link was an option to be honest, I know syvecs have great reviews I just can't justify the costs.
Old 16 April 2019, 01:58 PM
  #4  
LewisScoob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
LewisScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 1,123
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

If you're going for 500hp, you're already shelling out a massive chunk of cash. Look on the Syvecs as an insurance policy on the build costs or potential rebuild costs it could save you from not taking a Syvecs?
Old 16 April 2019, 02:02 PM
  #5  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies.
Syvecs doesn't appear on paper to be any more capable than the simtek from a day to day point of view but I'm happy to be educated.
Cheers.
Old 16 April 2019, 03:51 PM
  #6  
Broxi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Broxi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South West Scoobies
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if you do decide to go simtek, I have a Simtek from a 2004 Newage that will fit. with the latest alcatek update for closed loop knock / idle tec. was supplied by engine tuner, but is unlocked and comes with the lead and des key dongle.
was on my 467BHP Bugeye i recently broke.
Old 17 April 2019, 09:27 AM
  #7  
bludgod
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
bludgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,849
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

i'd look at link or syvecs based on knock control and ability to hook in things like fuel and oil pressure sensors for failsafes (don't have to be added from the outset, can be added in later) also link canbus wideband is rather good though too. Also important to factor in is who's mapping your car and what do they prefer to use - no point rocking up at your mapper with an ECU they aren't happy with you wont get the results your after.
Old 17 April 2019, 02:22 PM
  #8  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Broxi
if you do decide to go simtek, I have a Simtek from a 2004 Newage that will fit. with the latest alcatek update for closed loop knock / idle tec. was supplied by engine tuner, but is unlocked and comes with the lead and des key dongle.
was on my 467BHP Bugeye i recently broke.
Thanks for the offer but it's the new simtek only ECU I'm after rather than the alcatek/simtek


Originally Posted by bludgod
i'd look at link or syvecs based on knock control and ability to hook in things like fuel and oil pressure sensors for failsafes (don't have to be added from the outset, can be added in later) also link canbus wideband is rather good though too. Also important to factor in is who's mapping your car and what do they prefer to use - no point rocking up at your mapper with an ECU they aren't happy with you wont get the results your after.
Link is deffo an option however the latest simtek also uses knock control, it's a very capable ECU with most of the features seen on syvecs
Old 17 April 2019, 03:07 PM
  #9  
bludgod
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
bludgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,849
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ianbott
Link is deffo an option however the latest simtek also uses knock control, it's a very capable ECU with most of the features seen on syvecs

yes - im aware of the features on the newer simteks, my choice remains the same though and I'd still advise check with your mapper what ECU they recommend for you and what features they plan to enable. It wouldn't be the first time I've seen an ECU with things like knock/boost/closed loop lambda all turned off.
Old 17 April 2019, 03:16 PM
  #10  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the reply, if I go with simtek I will use Steve Simpson himself for mapping.
There is a company very local to me who can fit and map the link, they specialise in 1000+Bhp Nissan GTR's so would assume they are pretty competent
My other option of running ecutek would obviously retain factory ECU features such as diagnostic codes and my choice for ecutek is a company again very local to me who do great work on Toyota GT86's and also imprezas.
Old 19 April 2019, 01:27 PM
  #11  
Henrik
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (5)
 
Henrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,116
Received 144 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

The factory ECU is a very capable ECU, and even Martyn Jeffery (engine tuner) recommended the standard ECU (not with the standard map, obviously) on a recent thread.

IMO there is very little point in shelling out for a bunch of features most of us will _never_ use. It's not like 500hp is a that much power nowadays anyway.
Old 19 April 2019, 01:33 PM
  #12  
Henrik
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (5)
 
Henrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,116
Received 144 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

This thread, despite the title, has some interesting information in it from someone who maps cars for a living (and then the rest of us plebs with more or less uninformed opinions):
https://www.scoobynet.com/general-te...bhp-turbo.html
Old 16 May 2019, 05:26 PM
  #13  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Henrik
The factory ECU is a very capable ECU, and even Martyn Jeffery (engine tuner) recommended the standard ECU (not with the standard map, obviously) on a recent thread.

IMO there is very little point in shelling out for a bunch of features most of us will _never_ use. It's not like 500hp is a that much power nowadays anyway.
Yes the factory ecu is very good, better IMHO than the Simtek in every way. We've had nothing but trouble with them since they first came out and won't entertain mapping them anymore. The factory ecu can be tuned using a speed density based rom file, have all the toys like ALS, Launch, Flat shifting and switchable maps all without losing any of the useful diagnostic functions of the OE ecu. If however the OP wants something live mappable and flex fuel capable the Link would be our ecu of choice.
Old 16 May 2019, 06:01 PM
  #14  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
Yes the factory ecu is very good, better IMHO than the Simtek in every way. We've had nothing but trouble with them since they first came out and won't entertain mapping them anymore. The factory ecu can be tuned using a speed density based rom file, have all the toys like ALS, Launch, Flat shifting and switchable maps all without losing any of the useful diagnostic functions of the OE ecu. If however the OP wants something live mappable and flex fuel capable the Link would be our ecu of choice.
Hi Martyn very much appreciate your time replying.
You clearly have much more experience with ECU's than myself and maybe most.
I'm not sure if there is much difference between the older simtek/alcatek and the relaunched latest version of simtek, any ideas?

FYI the primary reasoning for wanting to switch to an aftermarket ECU is so I can run a drive by wire throttle on an EJ207 engine. This is due to the engine being installed into a rear engined kit car.

Thanks again guys for the input it gives me food for thought.
Old 16 May 2019, 06:15 PM
  #15  
scoobiepaul
Scooby Regular
 
scoobiepaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 672
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

500hp in a kit car.... tell us more
Old 16 May 2019, 07:04 PM
  #16  
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,151
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I’ve got Simtek on mine and it’s fantastic, no problems starting etc, has knock etc, fitted and mapped by TDR over a year ago.
Old 16 May 2019, 07:18 PM
  #17  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobiepaul
500hp in a kit car.... tell us more
I use the term kit car very loosely, it's a VW beach buggy.
Going to be running the engine as above with a 5 speed newage gearbox converted to 2 wheel drive and the output reversed.
Old 16 May 2019, 07:53 PM
  #18  
LewisScoob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
LewisScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 1,123
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Jesus I can hear the 5 speed trembling from here! 😂
Old 16 May 2019, 08:01 PM
  #19  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LewisScoob
Jesus I can hear the 5 speed trembling from here! 😂
You'd be amazed what they can handle when the weight of the vehicle is around 750kg.
To put it into perspective the engine prior to being removed was running around 400bhp through an exedy wrx clutch which is rated around 240bhp If i recall correctly and shows almost zero signs of wear even after a fair few days at Santa pod.
Old 17 May 2019, 01:06 AM
  #20  
domino46
Scooby Regular
 
domino46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: www.bbscoobys.com
Posts: 3,179
Received 264 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ianbott
I use the term kit car very loosely, it's a VW beach buggy.
Going to be running the engine as above with a 5 speed newage gearbox converted to 2 wheel drive and the output reversed.

I had a T25 with a turbo lump in it that I fitted ,, had the full RJES kit in it but wanted to reverse a subaru box as the ratios were crap even though I had the DK box but sold the van before I got around to it ,, that looks a fun bit of kit

im also running over 500hp out of my standard hatchback ecu
Old 17 May 2019, 05:22 PM
  #21  
joe v3sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
joe v3sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: yorkshire
Posts: 3,244
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Do it once do it right. SYVECS
Old 17 May 2019, 06:37 PM
  #22  
ianbott
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ianbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Warrington
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joe v3sti
Do it once do it right. SYVECS
I really don't agree with that, each to their own but features wise it compares to other ecus but with a sky high price tag.
Old 17 May 2019, 08:06 PM
  #23  
Turbovin
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Turbovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 678
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Link G4+ is a great choice too.
Old 17 May 2019, 09:08 PM
  #24  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ianbott
Hi Martyn very much appreciate your time replying.
You clearly have much more experience with ECU's than myself and maybe most.
I'm not sure if there is much difference between the older simtek/alcatek and the relaunched latest version of simtek, any ideas?

FYI the primary reasoning for wanting to switch to an aftermarket ECU is so I can run a drive by wire throttle on an EJ207 engine. This is due to the engine being installed into a rear engined kit car.

Thanks again guys for the input it gives me food for thought.
Yes they're different in almost every aspect as they're not even made by the same people. The old Simtek/Alcatek was made by Alcatek Control Systems and was a nice ecu by the time they'd added all the features I'd requested. Closed loop knock control, closed loop idle, closed loop wideband and additional sensor support all came from and were in the field tested by us.
The new one was originally produced by Gems based on their ecu but was moved to China. We trialed a few units on various cars but removed all of them and replaced them with alternatives due to all kind of issues. I was told something recently that rang true, the first time you fit something that isn't good it's their fault, the second time it's yours 😂
Link is a different ball game, great product, great support and a Lifetime warranty.
Old 02 January 2020, 01:12 AM
  #25  
Markcbz
Scooby Newbie
 
Markcbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: uk
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
Yes they're different in almost every aspect as they're not even made by the same people. The old Simtek/Alcatek was made by Alcatek Control Systems and was a nice ecu by the time they'd added all the features I'd requested. Closed loop knock control, closed loop idle, closed loop wideband and additional sensor support all came from and were in the field tested by us.
The new one was originally produced by Gems based on their ecu but was moved to China. We trialed a few units on various cars but removed all of them and replaced them with alternatives due to all kind of issues. I was told something recently that rang true, the first time you fit something that isn't good it's their fault, the second time it's yours 😂
Link is a different ball game, great product, great support and a Lifetime warranty.
Bit of an old thread, but what issues did you get with the Simtek?

Thanks
Old 02 January 2020, 09:50 AM
  #26  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

anything that reads Smeg backwards is always gonna be onto a looser,,,, haha
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cannon Fodder
ScoobyNet General
169
07 May 2012 09:05 PM
Brit_in_Japan
General Technical
122
11 October 2010 02:40 PM
jamiedream
Wanted
1
16 August 2009 05:12 PM
wwp8
General Technical
29
03 March 2009 06:54 PM
PantsUK
ScoobyNet General
60
07 February 2008 11:02 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: ECUtek vs Simtek



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 PM.