SPEC 'C' been on the rollers today.........
12 March 2005, 04:11 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In hiding........
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SPEC 'C' been on the rollers today.........
ok so took it to the WR1oc rolling road day, have come back with some strange but ok figures.........
only 290bhp but 315lb torque..... been told its running rich and the map could do with a tweek.... time for an exhaust and re-map i guess.......
only 290bhp but 315lb torque..... been told its running rich and the map could do with a tweek.... time for an exhaust and re-map i guess.......
12 March 2005, 04:47 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Those figures are about right for the milage, shove a panel filter in there and watch yourself smile as the torque and bhp go up some more 
First time in mine at 1700 miles she ran 288bhp and just over 300bs of torque so a fair comparison.
Tony
First time in mine at 1700 miles she ran 288bhp and just over 300bs of torque so a fair comparison.
Tony
12 March 2005, 05:16 PM
#6
BANNED
Join Date: May 2004
Location: afganistan
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gutmann pug
Its litcho who quotes more I think when he re-maps and fits the miltek
Last edited by rizzy; 12 March 2005 at 05:21 PM.
Trending Topics
12 March 2005, 07:39 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Production car wise the s202 was the most powerful scoob to leave the factory 320ps (315bhp). They remap rather well Rasher's is running 350bhp and 346lb/ft just with an ecutek remap.
Even mine responded well to a remap 276bhp and 249lb/ft standard went to 320bhp and 280lb/ft after a remap (still got the d/p cat as well).
Running again next week
Even mine responded well to a remap 276bhp and 249lb/ft standard went to 320bhp and 280lb/ft after a remap (still got the d/p cat as well).
Running again next week
13 March 2005, 11:17 AM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tuscan57
..... been told its running rich and the map could do with a tweek...
Last edited by WR1 Ant; 13 March 2005 at 11:24 AM.
13 March 2005, 12:44 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stuck behind that damn tractor or caravan on a B road!
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tuscan57
ok so took it to the WR1oc rolling road day, have come back with some strange but ok figures.........
only 290bhp but 315lb torque..... been told its running rich and the map could do with a tweek.... time for an exhaust and re-map i guess.......
only 290bhp but 315lb torque..... been told its running rich and the map could do with a tweek.... time for an exhaust and re-map i guess.......
13 March 2005, 01:38 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
" Now a new Prodrive performance package (to be fitted after registration of the vehicle) boosts power output to an awesome 320 PS."
that is a quote off a subaru website !!
"Limited to 500 vehicles, the WR1 features a power increase to around 320 PS with a range of technical and visual upgrades."
and here is another , i always presumed the wr1 had 320 bhp !!
that is a quote off a subaru website !!
"Limited to 500 vehicles, the WR1 features a power increase to around 320 PS with a range of technical and visual upgrades."
and here is another , i always presumed the wr1 had 320 bhp !!
13 March 2005, 01:57 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In hiding........
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by p1doc
a stanard sti ppp has better bhp than that
martin
martin
but an STI WOULDN'T be as quick...... 
Originally Posted by thecirsch
Is this the same Spec C that rinsed a certain 315 BHP WR1????
13 March 2005, 02:00 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In hiding........
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rhybeck
that is quite a balistic 290 bhp i have seen what it can doooooo...
was this rollers or dyno pack ?
was this rollers or dyno pack ?
they connected up the laptop and was monitored by a second person in the passenger seat..........
13 March 2005, 03:32 PM
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bluenose172
Chris what kind of Impreza do you have? I've always thought about just going for a remap and forgetting about the de-cat.
Last edited by chrisp; 13 March 2005 at 03:35 PM.
13 March 2005, 03:35 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kent
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scoobydooooo
" Now a new Prodrive performance package (to be fitted after registration of the vehicle) boosts power output to an awesome 320 PS."
that is a quote off a subaru website !!
"Limited to 500 vehicles, the WR1 features a power increase to around 320 PS with a range of technical and visual upgrades."
and here is another , i always presumed the wr1 had 320 bhp !!
that is a quote off a subaru website !!
"Limited to 500 vehicles, the WR1 features a power increase to around 320 PS with a range of technical and visual upgrades."
and here is another , i always presumed the wr1 had 320 bhp !!
Last edited by WR1 Ant; 13 March 2005 at 03:37 PM.
13 March 2005, 03:36 PM
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by thecirsch
Is this the same Spec C that rinsed a certain 315 BHP WR1????
\\Stands back and waits for the ballon to go up//
\\Stands back and waits for the ballon to go up//
martin
13 March 2005, 07:25 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by p1doc
no that was a 13 yr old peugeot!!!
martin
martin
Gangsta to take the Bait then ???
Tiny...
15 March 2005, 02:43 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so with 100 or 101 ron fuel would the spec C be putting out 310? 315? or were you using booster? (i havent read the first post so forgive me if this has been said )
15 March 2005, 03:11 PM
#30
WR1: 1480 kg
Power: 238.6 kw / 320 bhp @ 5800 rpm
Torque: 420 nm / 309.8 ft lbs @ 4000 rpm
Power-to-weight = 216.22 bhp/ton
Spec C: 1350 kg
Power: 279.8 PS (276.0 bhp) (205.8 kW) @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 394.0 Nm (291 lbft) (40.2 kgm) @ 4400 rpm
Power-to-weight = 204.44 bhp/ton
Power: 238.6 kw / 320 bhp @ 5800 rpm
Torque: 420 nm / 309.8 ft lbs @ 4000 rpm
Power-to-weight = 216.22 bhp/ton
Spec C: 1350 kg
Power: 279.8 PS (276.0 bhp) (205.8 kW) @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 394.0 Nm (291 lbft) (40.2 kgm) @ 4400 rpm
Power-to-weight = 204.44 bhp/ton
Last edited by rb5 286; 15 March 2005 at 03:36 PM.