Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Why change the intercooler....!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 December 2003, 12:13 PM
  #1  
dominicm
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dominicm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

These are a list of my Mod's on my STI RA MY95!!! Full GrpN catless exhaust, 550cc injectors, uprated fuel pump and reg, K&N air filter and the Link ECU package.

The car boosts to 21/22 psi and then settles back to about 18/17 psi, I'm getting nearly all the boost by 3000rpm so the car is super responsive with the RA gearbox!!!

I guess my next step is an uprated intercooler, my question is how will it improve my cars performance. I really can't see me safely running higher boost on the standard internals so is it worth spending over £600 on an intercooler

Cheers
Dom.
Old 09 December 2003, 12:51 PM
  #2  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Yes.

Better intercooler means more same mass of air in engine at lower temps (and lower boost) which is safer and can create more power with suitable mapping.

Or you can run same boost and benefit from greater mass of air.

Standard angled topmount isn't great at all.

paul
Old 09 December 2003, 01:30 PM
  #3  
dominicm
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dominicm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Cheers for the response Paul, I was thinking about the APS top mounted one for about £600, does anyone know how it performs?

Dom.
Old 09 December 2003, 01:48 PM
  #4  
nom
Scooby Senior
 
nom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I had the APS TMIC at one point - this was on a MY99, which I think has a significantly improved IC over the older cars in the first place? Anyway - yes, there were gains, but not particularly big ones. I think the actual 'cooling' effect was very similar to the standard MY99 IC, but offered significantly less resistance to airflow (less pressure drop) so the turbo (ickle TD04 at the time) seemed much 'happier' (technical stuff! ).
However... I switched to an APS FMIC (I like the APS tough fins) and the difference was very noticeable - a significant jump over the APS TMIC. This wasn't with the TD04 but an MD254 (which had also been run for some time on the TMIC).
IMHO, unless you have a good reason to stay with a TMIC (such as living in Switzerland ), skip it & go for a front mount.
Old 09 December 2003, 01:58 PM
  #5  
CataIunya
Scooby Regular
 
CataIunya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How would mapping take advantage of the greater cool er air charge if no more boost was used....more advance ?
Old 09 December 2003, 02:50 PM
  #6  
Delboy2
Scooby Regular
 
Delboy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

With better cooling the charge air density increases therefore the Air Fuel Ratio will increase thus leaning the fuel mixture. So the fuel map will need tweaking to account for this. When I changed from the standard slanty TMIC to a version 5/6 TMIC it was noticeable that AFR had leaned slightly on the Lambdalink when on WOT.

Cheers

[Edited by Delboy2 - 12/9/2003 2:52:14 PM]
Old 09 December 2003, 03:37 PM
  #7  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

MAF based cars shouldn't see a change in AFR. The mass of air is measured, and it's temp is not really subject to significant changes.

What can happen is you flow so much more air that the fuelling isn't able to keep up and you see an artificial leaning which wouldn't otherwise happen. Also, you may find yourself on a new leaner part of the same map, but this is unlikely with most subaru maps as they get very rich with increasing airflow.

Cars with MAP based ecus such as link, motec etc will require fuelling changes.

Old 10 December 2003, 09:47 AM
  #8  
dominicm
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dominicm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I have a Link ECU so I don't use a MAF, so if I change to a FMIC I will cause my car to run lean beacause there would be more cooler air begin sucks in and therefore have to get Bob to do a remap to increase the fuelling and therefore increase the overall performance with out having to increase the boost level or Bob could even increase the boost slighly!!!

I guess the only decision is to go for an uprated TMIC or lash out on a FMIC which are a lot of money!!!

Dom.


Old 10 December 2003, 09:14 PM
  #9  
hades
Scooby Regular
 
hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Personally - and I'm no great expert - I'd say an uprated TMIC is the right thing for (a) people who want to keep their TD04 or similarly small turbo, or (b) people who don't want to cut the bumper. For anyone after big power, with a bigger turbo, FMIC is the best way to go. IMHO, your turbo will be big enough to benefit from a FMIC.

There are two ways you'd benefit at the same boost level - one is stated above, from cooler air = increased charge density. The other - following up on nom's comment - you generally have a lower pressure drop across an uprated intercooler. Therefore, the turbo is likely to be running more efficiently, (which will mean cooler air anyway), creating less exhaust back pressure, so your volumetric efficieny will increase.

The other way of getting more power: I know of someone who fitted an uprated APS TMIC to a bugeye with the standard TD04, but then managed to get it custom mapped to run over 19psi held in the midrange. The I/C dropped about 2psi less than standard, so he was able to up the boost by nearly that much. He got 313bhp at PE, which is noticably higher than I've ever seen from anyone else with a TD04.
Old 11 December 2003, 08:14 AM
  #10  
dominicm
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dominicm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I'm still not decided about which why to go, my car has a TD05 turbo and does run high boost without much drop already. As I said earlier I have well over 1 bar by 3000rpm so I don't have much lag!!

I do not want to cut up the bumper, lose lights or aircon so the only front mount will be the Pace, which hasn't had the best reviews on this BBS, to be honest all the uprated TMIC's haven't had the best reviews either!!

I just don't want to spend £1200 to have a slight increase in power and maybe an increase in turbo lag!!

Dom.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Why change the intercooler....!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 PM.