Backbox for flames?
07 July 2003, 06:14 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
Currently have a magnex oval back box, just got this backbox to go with a flame kit.
So which one will work best?
which one do you like the best?
Thanks
Currently have a magnex oval back box, just got this backbox to go with a flame kit.
So which one will work best?
which one do you like the best?
Thanks
08 July 2003, 09:08 AM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
it looks awful.. stick with magnex and dont bother with a flame kit... <shakes head> Thought you had more style.. <grin creeps onto his face>
Tut tut..
Still doesnt let you keep up when joining the m621 at silly speed
How was the windscreen
Tut tut..
Still doesnt let you keep up when joining the m621 at silly speed
How was the windscreen
08 July 2003, 11:02 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Leeds
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yep i quite like the back box but the rear pipe is just too long its like a massive S shape!
would prefer a straighter piece o pipe.
Wallis's car is coverd in dust, so you will be eating it if you go anywhere near it!
would prefer a straighter piece o pipe.
Wallis's car is coverd in dust, so you will be eating it if you go anywhere near it!
Trending Topics
08 July 2003, 01:11 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leeds
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wallis i can run faster than your scoob, you will be eating the dust from my nike air max fool!
For the time being anyway
Got the short shifter done took 15mins with the correct tools and lost about 45% of the throw.
Nitrous isnt an option, its a way of life....
For the time being anyway
Got the short shifter done took 15mins with the correct tools and lost about 45% of the throw.
Nitrous isnt an option, its a way of life....
08 July 2003, 02:30 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Leeds
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey you wallis dont spill the beans on Project L
Also got an H&S centre section.
Its now a 1.8 GL (hush) not a turbo! well to the population of Rounday Rd occupants.
The bung actually make alot of difference..
with it in, the low end is noticably better, pickup is smoother and you feel the turbo kick in more.
Without - its loud and you cant feel the turbo kick in as much1 strange really!
Also got an H&S centre section.
Its now a 1.8 GL (hush) not a turbo! well to the population of Rounday Rd occupants.
The bung actually make alot of difference..
with it in, the low end is noticably better, pickup is smoother and you feel the turbo kick in more.
Without - its loud and you cant feel the turbo kick in as much1 strange really!
08 July 2003, 02:33 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
still fookin slow.. and he wont let me play with it and get the boost up <shakes head>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post