Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

blocking internet access for employees

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 October 2009, 12:58 PM
  #1  
spectrum48k
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
spectrum48k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default blocking internet access for employees

so they have a draytek vigor, and I've set the 4 managers up with fixed IP address

the draytek firewall rules I setup permit the 4 IP addresses through, and blocks port 80 for anything else.

So, assuming the employees get clever, which other ports should I block to prevent them from access the net using other methods ?
Old 14 October 2009, 01:10 PM
  #2  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

it depends on your actual goals - the internet is short for interconnected network

you have blocked port 80 access to the internet -- this in reality is only http traffic - what most people know as www (or the web)

what about FTP traffic on port 21? should they be allowed FTP access to the internet

they could set up a webserver on the internet on port 8080 and connect to it or even 3389 which would mean the could RDP to a remote machine and the surf the net

the instant messaging protocols?

most enterprise organisation block all out bound requests apart from 80 and 443 -- then block actual dodgy URL's/IP's -- so if you want to block internet traffic you may just have to block all outbound access aprt from the managers fixed IP's

you managers might need 443 access btw

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 14 October 2009 at 01:14 PM.
Old 14 October 2009, 05:39 PM
  #3  
mike1210
Scooby Regular
 
mike1210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yep as Hodgy with my 2600G I used to have the first filter rule as block everything unless an exeption and then add exceptions after this, on the 2600 you had to specify TCP and UDP as seperate rules or it wouldn't work. Also it didn't support IP protocols (GRE for example) and only had simplified SPI, hopefully the newer 2800's are better for this, it did however support wildcard masking (ranges) so to keep the rules as few as possible make the managers IP next to each other so to speak (192.168.1.20-192.168.1.24)

so it was

Block all TCP
Block all UDP
allow port 53 UDP (unless you have internal DNS servers this would also
be needed)
Allow port 80 TCP (http) for 192.168.1.20-192.168.1.24
Allow port 443 TCP (https)
allow port 21 TCP (ftp)

the above may cause probs with FTP connections as passive (might be active can't remember which) FTP makes another connection to the same IP on a random tcp port on the range 1024-65535 so this would be blocked by the filter unless the 2800 has an FTP inspect feature on the firewall (the 2600 didn't)

Last edited by mike1210; 14 October 2009 at 05:48 PM.
Old 14 October 2009, 07:18 PM
  #4  
pimmo2000
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
pimmo2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: On a small Island near France
Posts: 14,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

why ? how about trusting them ? and using gross misconduct as a prize
Old 14 October 2009, 11:59 PM
  #5  
mike1210
Scooby Regular
 
mike1210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pimmo2000
why ? how about trusting them ? and using gross misconduct as a prize
Pimmo, Spectrum may just be following a criteria that the managers have set out for him, no one to have net access bar the managers etc etc.
Old 15 October 2009, 09:54 AM
  #6  
BlkKnight
Scooby Regular
 
BlkKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do they need access to the web at all?

Just remove their route (default gateway) to the web.

If your network is DHCP - remove the gateway & manually add it to those that need it.
Old 15 October 2009, 01:15 PM
  #7  
spectrum48k
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
spectrum48k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pimmo2000
why ? how about trusting them ? and using gross misconduct as a prize
to answer that, the managers put the internet in and "trusted them" for about 3 months, when one of the machines was caught surfing a dodgy site in thailand and picked up a really nasty virus - that resisted all attempts to remove it, until the hard drive was removed and sorted externally, resulting in loss of production to the equipment that was connected to it.

Last edited by spectrum48k; 15 October 2009 at 01:23 PM.
Old 15 October 2009, 01:16 PM
  #8  
spectrum48k
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
spectrum48k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mike1210
yep as Hodgy with my 2600G I used to have the first filter rule as block everything unless an exeption and then add exceptions after this, on the 2600 you had to specify TCP and UDP as seperate rules or it wouldn't work. Also it didn't support IP protocols (GRE for example) and only had simplified SPI, hopefully the newer 2800's are better for this, it did however support wildcard masking (ranges) so to keep the rules as few as possible make the managers IP next to each other so to speak (192.168.1.20-192.168.1.24)

so it was

Block all TCP
Block all UDP
allow port 53 UDP (unless you have internal DNS servers this would also
be needed)
Allow port 80 TCP (http) for 192.168.1.20-192.168.1.24
Allow port 443 TCP (https)
allow port 21 TCP (ftp)

the above may cause probs with FTP connections as passive (might be active can't remember which) FTP makes another connection to the same IP on a random tcp port on the range 1024-65535 so this would be blocked by the filter unless the 2800 has an FTP inspect feature on the firewall (the 2600 didn't)
that'll do me!

question - anti-virus software on these factory workstations needs to update itself. How do you go about allowing that ? Do I need to check with anti-virus website and find the except method of communication and create a specific rule for it ?

Last edited by spectrum48k; 15 October 2009 at 01:19 PM.
Old 15 October 2009, 01:49 PM
  #9  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spectrum48k
that'll do me!

question - anti-virus software on these factory workstations needs to update itself. How do you go about allowing that ? Do I need to check with anti-virus website and find the except method of communication and create a specific rule for it ?
you need to find the port the client av programe connects to the remote update server host on

and allow that out of the firewall

but in any case you are going to have to be slighly smart in configuring your internt access

basically you cannot do a global deny -- so no that won't do you

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 15 October 2009 at 01:53 PM.
Old 15 October 2009, 04:15 PM
  #10  
mike1210
Scooby Regular
 
mike1210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another thing as well......windows updates ....unless you have an internal WSUS server. I didn't think of Anti-Virus updates either

If you knew the anti-virus server IP you technically could add an exception on port for an IP address and the microsoft range but this could proove to be a major ****, a default deny in this case could proove to be too obstructive. The draytek routers I'm sure have a surfcontrol interface which you can subscribe too which allowes websites to be blocked but could allow out other traffic for a small fee. What draytek do they have?

DrayTek Web Content Management

Last edited by mike1210; 15 October 2009 at 04:21 PM.
Old 20 October 2009, 09:19 PM
  #11  
spectrum48k
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
spectrum48k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mike1210
Another thing as well......windows updates ....unless you have an internal WSUS server. I didn't think of Anti-Virus updates either

If you knew the anti-virus server IP you technically could add an exception on port for an IP address and the microsoft range but this could proove to be a major ****, a default deny in this case could proove to be too obstructive. The draytek routers I'm sure have a surfcontrol interface which you can subscribe too which allowes websites to be blocked but could allow out other traffic for a small fee. What draytek do they have?

DrayTek Web Content Management
Its a Vigor 2600

Windows Updates - good point - I'll check out the ports and addresses
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
TylerD529
General Technical
2
09 October 2015 01:53 AM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
wms-racing
Wanted
0
28 September 2015 10:05 AM



Quick Reply: blocking internet access for employees



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 PM.