9/11 Alleged conspiracy.
08 January 2014, 08:32 PM
#151
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Upon reading this post ERA will think carefully about how to respond despite it being inconsequential. Alternatively, ERA will not respond, but this will prove challenging now that I've listed that as an option. Of course ERA might simply dismiss the above as fantasy leaving only the two of us confident of the truth and readers left to draw their own conclusion.
Last edited by JTaylor; 08 January 2014 at 09:56 PM.
08 January 2014, 08:52 PM
#152
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about this: Einstein RA posts something slightly offensive, but disguises it as a gag. He does this because he was feeling sensitive about JackClark's and my post imagining that he was in some way implicated. Upon reviewing his post ERA realises that a) he implicates himself by being defensive b) it was a little out of line and that c) the post wasn't funny enough to deflect from points a and b. This results in ERA choosing to delete his post.
Upon reading this post ERA will think carefully about how to respond despite it being inconsequential. Alternatively, ERA will not respond, but this will prove challenging now that I've listed that as an option. Of course ERA might simply dismiss the above as fantasy leaving only the two of us confidant of the truth and readers left to draw their own conclusion.
Upon reading this post ERA will think carefully about how to respond despite it being inconsequential. Alternatively, ERA will not respond, but this will prove challenging now that I've listed that as an option. Of course ERA might simply dismiss the above as fantasy leaving only the two of us confidant of the truth and readers left to draw their own conclusion.
Thank you, James.
09 January 2014, 09:33 AM
#155
How about this: Einstein RA posts something slightly offensive, but disguises it as a gag. He does this because he was feeling sensitive about JackClark's and my post imagining that he was in some way implicated. Upon reviewing his post ERA realises that a) he implicates himself by being defensive b) it was a little out of line and that c) the post wasn't funny enough to deflect from points a and b. This results in ERA choosing to delete his post.
Upon reading this post ERA will think carefully about how to respond despite it being inconsequential. Alternatively, ERA will not respond, but this will prove challenging now that I've listed that as an option. Of course ERA might simply dismiss the above as fantasy leaving only the two of us confident of the truth and readers left to draw their own conclusion.
Upon reading this post ERA will think carefully about how to respond despite it being inconsequential. Alternatively, ERA will not respond, but this will prove challenging now that I've listed that as an option. Of course ERA might simply dismiss the above as fantasy leaving only the two of us confident of the truth and readers left to draw their own conclusion.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post