Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Kinugawa Turbo Hype!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 November 2016, 09:36 AM
  #61  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
damn thats laggy
NOt that bad realy heres my SC42 hat had been fitted to my Blob STI


Old 17 November 2016, 09:41 AM
  #62  
On-the-bog
Scooby Regular
 
On-the-bog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ah just re-read it, thought it was on a 2.5.
Old 17 November 2016, 09:46 AM
  #63  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
Ah just re-read it, thought it was on a 2.5.
I think that last graph was on a 2.5 actually so yea i thought a 2.5 would wake it up earlier,

sorry mate it's me who can't read
Old 17 November 2016, 09:49 AM
  #64  
Ste333
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Ste333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
damn thats laggy
well it is a 25G I suppose interesting to see the numbers though
Old 17 November 2016, 09:55 AM
  #65  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

add my bit here, I have a cheap Chinese eBay 20g that was £125 band new with 1 year warranty.
Must be doing the business as my full weight newage (1500kg with driver) does consistent 12.3's with it, so circa 380hp.
I love all the tubro snobbery
Old 17 November 2016, 10:00 AM
  #66  
On-the-bog
Scooby Regular
 
On-the-bog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy
I think that last graph was on a 2.5 actually so yea i thought a 2.5 would wake it up earlier,

sorry mate it's me who can't read
ah i re-re-read and yeah rb5 with s forged 2.5 hahaha.

So statement stands, I'd expect it to be 1000 rpm earlier to full torque so very very laggy
Old 17 November 2016, 10:01 AM
  #67  
On-the-bog
Scooby Regular
 
On-the-bog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
add my bit here, I have a cheap Chinese eBay 20g that was £125 band new with 1 year warranty.
Must be doing the business as my full weight newage (1500kg with driver) does consistent 12.3's with it, so circa 380hp.
I love all the tubro snobbery
It's nothing to do with snobbery at all, its to do with best results of spool vs power.
Old 17 November 2016, 10:03 AM
  #68  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
ah i re-re-read and yeah rb5 with s forged 2.5 hahaha.

So statement stands, I'd expect it to be 1000 rpm earlier to full torque so very very laggy
Agree,

Would've been acceptable had it been on a 2.0 would expect over 400 ft/lbs from a built 2.5,
Old 17 November 2016, 10:05 AM
  #69  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
add my bit here, I have a cheap Chinese eBay 20g that was £125 band new with 1 year warranty.
Must be doing the business as my full weight newage (1500kg with driver) does consistent 12.3's with it, so circa 380hp.
I love all the tubro snobbery
Can we see a graph for this cheapo turbo

or is it a guestimate ?

If it's doing those times who cares what brand it is
Old 17 November 2016, 10:10 AM
  #70  
On-the-bog
Scooby Regular
 
On-the-bog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For comparison, all pulling considerably more power and spool

https://www.scoobynet.com/799025-sco...l#post10499895

post 3554

even outspooled by a 2.0

https://www.scoobynet.com/799025-sco...etter-126.html

post 3761
Old 17 November 2016, 10:15 AM
  #71  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
It's nothing to do with snobbery at all, its to do with best results of spool vs power.
Full boost 1.6 bar by 2800rpm, 1.5 bar held to 6500+
Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy
Can we see a graph for this cheapo turbo

or is it a guestimate ?

If it's doing those times who cares what brand it is
It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road. Power isn't important, the speed of the car is what matters
Old 17 November 2016, 10:22 AM
  #72  
On-the-bog
Scooby Regular
 
On-the-bog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
Full boost 1.6 bar by 2800rpm, 1.5 bar held to 6500+

It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road. Power isn't important, the speed of the car is what matters
Maybe yours is (got a dyno graph for comparison, spool is typically later on a dyno). But every turbo performs differently on different cars not to mention you may have got one that is decent.

I shall explain, cheap knockoffs tend to have much larger tolerances, however that doesn't mean 1 in 1000 can't be a good match and tolerances be very tight, so it performs ok.
Old 17 November 2016, 10:31 AM
  #73  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
Maybe yours is (got a dyno graph for comparison, spool is typically later on a dyno). But every turbo performs differently on different cars not to mention you may have got one that is decent.

I shall explain, cheap knockoffs tend to have much larger tolerances, however that doesn't mean 1 in 1000 can't be a good match and tolerances be very tight, so it performs ok.
Tolerance of which part?
I have had four engines and Seven tubros on my Impreza in 3 years, this is the fastest.
I have owned and ran 8 cheap Chinese turbos over the years all with good results (from escorts, sierras, BMW, golf, two impreza's) also ran genuine garretts, holsets and mhi tubros.
Old 17 November 2016, 10:31 AM
  #74  
scooby2.5maz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WORCESTER
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ste333
well it is a 25G I suppose interesting to see the numbers though
He obviously hasn't driven enough . He also needs to realise it's on stock wrx heads , non avcs . Also it ain't a £1500 turbo but £500 turbo
Old 17 November 2016, 10:31 AM
  #75  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
Full boost 1.6 bar by 2800rpm, 1.5 bar held to 6500+

It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road. Power isn't important, the speed of the car is what matters
Is there any proof of this ?

Full boost on a 2.0 by 2800rpm ?

or is it a 2.5 ?

Be nice to see a graph to compare
Old 17 November 2016, 10:32 AM
  #76  
Ste333
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Ste333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road.
That's very specific...how do you come to that calculation? Not taking the ****, just generally out of interest
Old 17 November 2016, 10:33 AM
  #77  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy
Is there any proof of this ?

Full boost on a 2.0 by 2800rpm ?

or is it a 2.5 ?

Be nice to see a graph to compare
2.5 9:1 compression. Proof of what?
Old 17 November 2016, 10:34 AM
  #78  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ste333
That's very specific...how do you come to that calculation? Not taking the ****, just generally out of interest
Torqstats never lies.....
Name:  CC21852F-B2F3-42D7-9CD8-5604DB48EB08_zpsrcit0xas.png
Views: 0
Size:  213.8 KB

Last edited by boosted; 17 November 2016 at 10:35 AM.
Old 17 November 2016, 10:36 AM
  #79  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
2.5 9:1 compression. Proof of what?
Proof of the power the spool any of these claims lol ?

Not doubting just always good to see a timeslip/dyno graph/datalog ?

So its a fully forged higher compression 2.5 ?
Old 17 November 2016, 10:37 AM
  #80  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
Torqstats never lies.....
Those apps are bull**** tbh,

What about transmission losses and the thousands of other variables ?

Id say give or take 10%
Old 17 November 2016, 10:38 AM
  #81  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy
Proof of the power the spool any of these claims lol ?

Not doubting just always good to see a timeslip/dyno graph/datalog ?

So its a fully forged higher compression 2.5 ?
Yeah, 2.5 with wrx heads, 8.9:1 compression and a 7cm cast 20g.
Name:  57F49C9B-5AC4-45A4-9CFD-0E21C1DE7265_zpsd6h2miti.png
Views: 0
Size:  150.6 KB
Old 17 November 2016, 10:39 AM
  #82  
On-the-bog
Scooby Regular
 
On-the-bog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

uh target calculator says 417bhp, its only when you put it in the calculated time (1500kg and 379bhp) is says 12.3.
Old 17 November 2016, 10:39 AM
  #83  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
Yeah, 2.5 with wrx heads, 8.9:1 compression and a 7cm cast 20g.

**** me did you do those times at Crail ?
Old 17 November 2016, 10:40 AM
  #84  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy
Those apps are bull**** tbh,

What about transmission losses and the thousands of other variables ?

Id say give or take 10%
Are they really?! What about said descepencies with a RR? It's all relative and all educated guesswork.
However the weight and times don't lie....
Old 17 November 2016, 10:40 AM
  #85  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy
**** me did you do those times at Crail ?
Yep, best bit is I mapped the car myself with a megasquirt
Old 17 November 2016, 10:41 AM
  #86  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
uh target calculator says 417bhp, its only when you put it in the calculated time (1500kg and 379bhp) is says 12.3.
Use dragstrip time not 1/4 mile
Old 17 November 2016, 10:41 AM
  #87  
On-the-bog
Scooby Regular
 
On-the-bog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Pinching one out
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
Are they really?! What about said descepencies with a RR? It's all relative and all educated guesswork.
However the weight and times don't lie....
in this case there's no benchmark times to compare the turbo's, hence the dyno benchmark, which while are slightly varying, decent dyno's typicly show results very similar.

Also were talking about spool here anyway so dyno would be the like for like.
Old 17 November 2016, 10:44 AM
  #88  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I thought a fully loaded newage oiled and fueled was closer to 1600kg,
Old 17 November 2016, 10:45 AM
  #89  
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 2,280
Received 77 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
Yep, best bit is I mapped the car myself with a megasquirt
Prob go even quicker elsewhere,

I suspect you have a fair chunk of torque to go with "only" 380 ish bhp,

Guessing well over 400Ftlbs 420 ish even
Old 17 November 2016, 10:47 AM
  #90  
boosted
Scooby Regular
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: harlow
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by On-the-bog
in this case there's no benchmark times to compare the turbo's, hence the dyno benchmark, which while are slightly varying, decent dyno's typicly show results very similar.

Also were talking about spool here anyway so dyno would be the like for like.
Of course dyno spool is BS anyway... road is where it counts.
I had a genuine evo3 big 16g on my 2.0l before the 2.5, it spooled about 3800 and couldn't hold boost up the top...
20g was spooling at 2800 and dropping like a stone too until I discovered an inlet pipe restriction... now it holds boost all the way. Can only assume this was the problem with the previous setup too. My point being let's not be too quick to blame the tubro. Chinese or not.


Quick Reply: Kinugawa Turbo Hype!!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 AM.