Notices

Classic handling vs Newage handling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 November 2010, 10:23 PM
  #61  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you had you geometry checked recently?
Old 06 November 2010, 10:40 PM
  #62  
MarkC
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
MarkC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got that done a couple of weeks ago, setup for negative camber etc, would 215/35/18 affect the handling compared to the 16" wheels? I have new bc coilovers, rear strut brace and whiteline 24mm front anti roll bar, im getting a uprated roll bar for the rear.

I went to two different garages to get the tracking done and it came up as perfect on the machine. I have a problem with the steering pulling to the left, even on a flat road when i leave go of the wheel the car pulls left?

Passed ntc/mot with no problems.

Last edited by MarkC; 06 November 2010 at 10:49 PM.
Old 07 November 2010, 12:09 AM
  #63  
Gregsti01
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Gregsti01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The subframe is part of the newage shell,classics flexed bad handling/tyre wear.To make car handle better,24 mm rear roll bar,stout mounts,alloy links,anti dive lower wishbone mounts.If you have a front end shunt this subframe might save your live so why remove a component that Subaru have spent a lot of money working on.Removing the subframe is just daft,you lose structual strength if you need to loes 17 kgs of weight put the driver on a diet
Old 07 November 2010, 12:32 AM
  #64  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gregsti01
The subframe is part of the newage shell,classics flexed bad handling/tyre wear.To make car handle better,24 mm rear roll bar,stout mounts,alloy links,anti dive lower wishbone mounts.If you have a front end shunt this subframe might save your live so why remove a component that Subaru have spent a lot of money working on.Removing the subframe is just daft,you lose structual strength if you need to loes 17 kgs of weight put the driver on a diet
No it's a bolt on appendage not part of the 'shell'

You remove it and replace it with something that offers you more. Life is a compromise you can't have everything at 100%, sometimes you have to accept that life is dangerous and you can't mitigate everything

Still 1000% safer than getting your kicks on a motorbike. Still safer than the equivalent crash in a classic without the subframe.

I've never seen a frontal crash test of a Subaru, but I have held a subframe in my hands and I doubt very much it would safe your life in a crash large enough to take it

For me it has very little to do with saving weight and everything to do with improving the driveability of a factory flawed car
Old 09 November 2010, 07:01 PM
  #65  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 53WRX
I've never seen a frontal crash test of a Subaru, but I have held a subframe in my hands and I doubt very much it would safe your life in a crash large enough to take it
How would you know? Without knowing the exact circumstances of the impact and also without knowing how the loads are passed into the chassis via the various chassis structures, you dont know how beneficial or otherwise this particular component will be with regards to saving lives. The most probable conclusion has to be it would improve your survival chances (and those of your engine/gearbox) compared to not having it fitted.
Old 09 November 2010, 07:16 PM
  #66  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnfelstead
How would you know? Without knowing the exact circumstances of the impact and also without knowing how the loads are passed into the chassis via the various chassis structures, you dont know how beneficial or otherwise this particular component will be with regards to saving lives. The most probable conclusion has to be it would improve your survival chances (and those of your engine/gearbox) compared to not having it fitted.
I don't and whilst I don't know, your probable conclusion is indeed sound, but I still prefer the Summit Racing Kit
Old 17 November 2010, 11:24 PM
  #67  
djc1
Scooby Regular
 
djc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i know the newage is 150kg heavier ,this certainly shows in the performance .
how much could realistically be stripped off the newage with things such as the sub frame?whats the u -bar someone mentioned ?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
serpico
ScoobyNet General
20
01 April 2019 07:47 AM
Billet
ScoobyNet General
42
14 October 2015 10:38 PM
PetrolHeadKid
Driving Dynamics
10
05 October 2015 05:19 PM
supshon
General Technical
2
03 October 2015 08:06 PM



Quick Reply: Classic handling vs Newage handling



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM.