Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

382.8bhp from a VF35 :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #571  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Its not true though, can you not understand that?
Lower IT on the one yesterday, higher one on the previous, yet still very similar, not really consistant tbh, and the fact is that S4U seem to always have (by the look of daz's graph also) highly inconsistant AT/IT's, which will give misleading readings, hence take it to SRR whom lots have used for RR days and has a very competent operator who has used the DD type RR for years and has lots of experience with said RR.

Tony
Oh will you lot make your bloody minds up , if the IT is actually taken at the intake and on one day it runs with an IT of 40 Deg and the next it runs at 16 and for the sake of saying it the AT was 14 deg, does the corrected BHP figure not end up being the same if both IT temps are correct and taken from the same place?

From what everyone is saying the figure would only be untrue if the IT was not taken from the intake, please tell me why my IT is not correct and true.

It high IT at S4U is probably down to Len running the car with the bonnet down.

The IT/AT reading is only misleading if the IT reading is infact not taken at the intake, or am I wrong.

I dont care if you believe it or not and as far as I am concerned I could run at ANY dyno with my bonnet down and my true intake temp will be high so it makes no difference really where I run the car the IT will still be high (I would put money on it).

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #572  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
these ones actualy look like they may hold water,,,,,,,,, pmsl
Nah all the AT and IT figures are all too far apart lol

The only thing driving everyone top believe that these figures are not true is the turbo that has produced them, perhaps you should open your minds to the possibility that what I have done has actually worked.

All this AT, IT, fudged figure crap is just getting boring now.

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 11:57 AM
  #573  
Andy916's Avatar
Andy916
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default

So, do s4u's rollers generally read similar to the others out there? How do they convert to power at the crank which you're quoting here?

360lbft and hanging on to 300lbft at 6500rpm would be completely unheard of at this spec surely? (ie. a little over 15% above the norm for a good vf35 setup)

Andy
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 11:58 AM
  #574  
Lewak's Avatar
Lewak
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by Big 'D'
I dont see why I should back down as the whole thing has just boiled down to my word against theirs, end of there is no real dispute here, if my car had run 355.8 and 355.9 respectively no-one would have batted an eyelid but as soon as I throw a 380+ in the mixer, NO, NOT POSSIBLE, FIGURES FUDGED etc etc.

My car does what it says on the tin, the end.

Cheers Iain
I KNOW YOUR CAR DOES WHAT IT SAYS ON THE TIN Iain
If it was me i would have given up ages ago. but thats just because i don't have the same knowledge as you are anyone else (if they truly do have knowledge )

but again i'm a stubon ******* and well i like a good bit of banter and like to get involved and learn stuff.

By the time i understand all this stuff i think the thread will have died down
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #575  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

Look I found a another one

Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #576  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy916
So, do s4u's rollers generally read similar to the others out there? How do they convert to power at the crank which you're quoting here?

360lbft and hanging on to 300lbft at 6500rpm would be completely unheard of at this spec surely? (ie. a little over 15% above the norm for a good vf35 setup)

Andy
WHP = 303 hp

Like I have just said perhaps what I have done to the turbo has actually worked,

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:34 PM
  #577  
Andy916's Avatar
Andy916
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge
Default

What did the car feel like before/after the latest mods and do you have dyno runs from before (either S4U or any other)?

Around this level, a jump of 40bhp makes a classic feel really different on the road (in my case it was 310bhp on a VF28 to 350bhp and now 360bhp with different turbos). The '**** dyno' should back up the figures shown by the rollers.

Andy
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:35 PM
  #578  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

It's a good result for sure, but I suspect you benefiting from the overall setup being good and well balanced along with some good luck. I wouldn't hold out on being able to replicate the same result every time, that's not to say it can't be done again.

Originally Posted by Big 'D'
WHP = 303 hp

Like I have just said perhaps what I have done to the turbo has actually worked,

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:38 PM
  #579  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by scooby-tc
You should try it on Surrey Rolling road,Charlie knows all there is to know about DD rollers and you will get a far more accurate reading as Len is still learning how to use his rollers as they have only been in a few months
Sounds to me like he still has a lot to learn

TX.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:41 PM
  #580  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by Big 'D'
The overall boost pressure was pretty much the same as before.
Stick the boost graph up too pls, thanks.

TX.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:46 PM
  #581  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Stick the boost graph up too pls, thanks.

TX.
I did not get a print of it yesterday but I will ask Len for a copy.

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:49 PM
  #582  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by Butty
Iain,
What is coming out of this is that a ducted air feed is needed on to the air filter to give a lower IT.
I haven't got a DAF & my IT/AT readings were both the same (18 - see earlier graph) ...

TX.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 12:57 PM
  #583  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ZEN Performance
It's a good result for sure, but I suspect you benefiting from the overall setup being good and well balanced along with some good luck. I wouldn't hold out on being able to replicate the same result every time, that's not to say it can't be done again.
I have no doubt that all cars will respond different and getting 2 to respond exactly the same even to the same mods would be good going.

Look at it from my point of view.

The 2 UK cars that have been setup using a very similar overall setup including the same turbo work both made 20+bhp more on Bob R's road dyno than what he expected, then I run a 380 on the dyno, again 20+ bhp over the norm so from this side of the fence it looks like I am doing something right.

There are more cars with the same/similar setup to follow so lets see what they come back with.

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:01 PM
  #584  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by Lewak
Two runs both with in 0.1bhp of the last
IT and AT are true
BHP true

good enough for me
The laws of physics tell us that 382hp from a VF35 is nigh on impossible hence the experts on here (I'm not one of em BTW) struggling with this RR result. It's that simple.

TX.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:03 PM
  #585  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
The laws of physics tell us that 382hp from a VF35 is nigh on impossible hence the experts on here (I'm not one of em BTW) struggling with this RR result. It's that simple.

TX.
100% agree with that.

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:03 PM
  #586  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

AT/ITs quite a bit different on all of those FFS!

TX.

Originally Posted by banny sti
Thought I would brighten the thread up with some more graphs





Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #587  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy916
What did the car feel like before/after the latest mods and do you have dyno runs from before (either S4U or any other)?

Around this level, a jump of 40bhp makes a classic feel really different on the road (in my case it was 310bhp on a VF28 to 350bhp and now 360bhp with different turbos). The '**** dyno' should back up the figures shown by the rollers.

Andy
Having had the car for over two years and having had it mapped, dynoed and run at Santa Pod after every major mod from Std - 310bhp - 325bhp - 349 bhp to its current state I would happily say that it has jumped at the very least 20bhp, it is way stronger all round compared to when it was 349. My best guess at my power prior to having the Dyno run was 370bhp and I am happy if it is 370, but it may well be closer to 380. My runs at Santa Pod are also very consistent so they are also a good marker of any improvements that have been made and they are all run on the same fuel and tyres etc.

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:13 PM
  #588  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
AT/ITs quite a bit different on all of those FFS!

TX.
I pointed that out earlier lol, its ok for these though as its not a VF35 pushing 380bhp

Cheers Iain
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #589  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Originally Posted by Big 'D'
Next week I will attempt to get 400bhp out of a Vespa and a Braun hair dryer

Cheers Iain

Better chance than getting 382.8bhp out of a VF35 !
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #590  
Big 'D''s Avatar
Big 'D'
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lateral Performance
Better chance than getting 382.8bhp out of a VF35 !
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #591  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
AT/ITs quite a bit different on all of those FFS!

TX.
Graph 1: GT35/42R 650bhp rated turbo

Graph 2: MD321T+ 475bhp rated turbo

Graph3: GT30 hybrid 450bhp rated turbo

Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:54 PM
  #592  
jayallen's Avatar
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
From: The Fabulist Hunter
Default

Originally Posted by Big 'D'

Its not " your word against there's" as you put it, its your word against some of the finest Subaru tuners in the country...Just have a look back through the thread and see which ones have made comment and tried to explain the dyno plot yet you still continue to argue with them...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #593  
dabow's Avatar
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
From: notts
Default

reading this whole thread is a head acke
i have been told by many that the surry rolling road is one of the best

it was a bonus that jgm also uses them for mapping.
but regards to the reading he got, id be the same if i was given the graft
but to save face, i would take the car to the surry setup.

any figure over the norm of 340bhp i would be over the moon with
id gladly chip in £1 towards it too to finally put this to rest
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 02:08 PM
  #594  
ScoobyDoo69's Avatar
ScoobyDoo69
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 3
From: WMI
Default

Any chance you could post some pics of your heatshield? I've got what I think to be a great heatshield around my RCM induction kit, with cold air feed. Infact it gets so much air, that when idling on the dyno the fan forces too much air and confuses the MAF making it want to stall
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #595  
53's Avatar
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 16,742
Likes: 4
From: Standing Up
Default

Originally Posted by Big 'D'
I have no doubt that all cars will respond different and getting 2 to respond exactly the same even to the same mods would be good going.

Look at it from my point of view.

The 2 UK cars that have been setup using a very similar overall setup including the same turbo work both made 20+bhp more on Bob R's road dyno than what he expected, then I run a 380 on the dyno, again 20+ bhp over the norm so from this side of the fence it looks like I am doing something right.

There are more cars with the same/similar setup to follow so lets see what they come back with.

Cheers Iain
@Wheels or fly ? Fly still involves assumptions not universally shared among mappers They're a performance business after all
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #596  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

26 or 24%? lol
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 02:46 PM
  #597  
dabow's Avatar
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
From: notts
Default

id still say if posable, get the car to a repatable rolling road, again i'll chip in a quid to the pot

then if the reading is around the same, no more arguing
i was always led to beleave these vf35's could only produse 340bhp
im sure others would chip in to get to the bottom of it.

all dougts will be at rest then.
its hit page 20 now.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #598  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by dabow
id still say if posable, get the car to a repatable rolling road, again i'll chip in a quid to the pot

then if the reading is around the same, no more arguing
i was always led to beleave these vf35's could only produse 340bhp
im sure others would chip in to get to the bottom of it.

all dougts will be at rest then.
its hit page 20 now.

340 is expected high, but you do get odd ***** that go a bit higher, but there is a limit to what a wheel can physicly flow.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #599  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

Originally Posted by Big 'D'
You've forgotten what I said in my earlier post (open mind)

and gone and lost your sense of humour too ! (sad face) Last post (cheeky face)


One suggestion, if you want people to keep an open mind to accepting results they haven't seen before, you need to keep an open mind, & accept the possibility that they "may" be wrong !
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #600  
scooby L's Avatar
scooby L
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: CHIPP'N HAM
Default

can someone with proven BHP visit S4U and we can get a R/R comparison?

That'll rule out one point of contention
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 AM.