0-60 times people???
11 September 2010, 05:17 PM
#31
Only ever had it timed the once and the results are on my previous post. I suspect it would have done a 3.5s on a good launch. My launches are always fairly consistent.
Never Pbox'd the Impreza and it is now being broken.
Pbox'd the 911 once and that was a very soft 3.9s 0-60mph, 60-130mph in 8.4s and 60-100mph in 3.9s. New rubber now fitted. Use the 60-130mph times to benchmark mods/shifting.
Never Pbox'd the Impreza and it is now being broken.
Pbox'd the 911 once and that was a very soft 3.9s 0-60mph, 60-130mph in 8.4s and 60-100mph in 3.9s. New rubber now fitted. Use the 60-130mph times to benchmark mods/shifting.
11 September 2010, 06:49 PM
#33
Rather embarrassingly I managed a 6.84seconds to 60 last year at Trax on their timed run.
But I didn't hold any revs before setting off and "launch" the car and I changed into third at 5.5Kmiles.
Not exactly the fastest way to get to 60 in an Impreza but since I would have to pay for any damage etc caused (plus i rely on the car every day) I’m not willing to try the fastest way...Prodrive state 4.6 seconds and who am i to prove them wrong
car
2003 STi Type UK with PPP
But I didn't hold any revs before setting off and "launch" the car and I changed into third at 5.5Kmiles.
Not exactly the fastest way to get to 60 in an Impreza but since I would have to pay for any damage etc caused (plus i rely on the car every day) I’m not willing to try the fastest way...Prodrive state 4.6 seconds and who am i to prove them wrong
car
2003 STi Type UK with PPP
11 September 2010, 08:08 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only ever had it timed the once and the results are on my previous post. I suspect it would have done a 3.5s on a good launch. My launches are always fairly consistent.
Never Pbox'd the Impreza and it is now being broken.
Pbox'd the 911 once and that was a very soft 3.9s 0-60mph, 60-130mph in 8.4s and 60-100mph in 3.9s. New rubber now fitted. Use the 60-130mph times to benchmark mods/shifting.
Never Pbox'd the Impreza and it is now being broken.
Pbox'd the 911 once and that was a very soft 3.9s 0-60mph, 60-130mph in 8.4s and 60-100mph in 3.9s. New rubber now fitted. Use the 60-130mph times to benchmark mods/shifting.
Excellent device for timing. Puts to bed all the pub talk
Highly recommend it.On mines had a low 4 sec 0-60, but I like to time 30-70 (3.0 in mines), and 60-100 (3.7secs).
11 September 2010, 09:28 PM
#36
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sherwood Forest
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For an explanation of how these figures are derived click here
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 302
Weight without Driver (KG) : 1395
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 219.96
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.60
0 - 100 (Secs) : 12.10
60 - 100 (Secs) : 7.50
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 13.29
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 104.83
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.89
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 108.23
Sounds spot on does that.
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 302
Weight without Driver (KG) : 1395
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 219.96
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.60
0 - 100 (Secs) : 12.10
60 - 100 (Secs) : 7.50
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 13.29
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 104.83
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.89
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 108.23
Sounds spot on does that.
11 September 2010, 10:19 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: llanelli, boyo
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check this site out, Just put my details in and I dont think it works tbh
http://www.060calculator.com/
http://www.060calculator.com/
i think ul have to put your weight in as the 1,200 or so kgs x 2.2=2640lbs for this one to work right
12 September 2010, 12:09 PM
#38
The calcs are pointless and the reason people find them to be even remotely accurate is the wide range between the "drag times" and the normal ones, something for everyone.
Without a driver the car doesn't move and then you have shift times, traction and gearing ratios to name but a few.
Without a driver the car doesn't move and then you have shift times, traction and gearing ratios to name but a few.
12 September 2010, 12:19 PM
#39
500+bhp?
If you get a chance to log a 60-130mph on the Performance Box let me know.
Be good to start a list like this on SN
Last edited by Aztec Performance Ltd; 12 September 2010 at 12:21 PM.
12 September 2010, 05:36 PM
#41
The calcs are pointless and the reason people find them to be even remotely accurate is the wide range between the "drag times" and the normal ones, something for everyone.
Without a driver the car doesn't move and then you have shift times, traction and gearing ratios to name but a few.
Without a driver the car doesn't move and then you have shift times, traction and gearing ratios to name but a few.
The cal is a guide only and work spot on for my spec.
12 September 2010, 06:03 PM
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like it goes like stink.
500+bhp?
If you get a chance to log a 60-130mph on the Performance Box let me know.
Be good to start a list like this on SN
500+bhp?
If you get a chance to log a 60-130mph on the Performance Box let me know.
Be good to start a list like this on SN
Not quite 500 yet. I guess the reason its quick is that it can do those increments without having to change gear. 30-70 is dispatched in 2nd, and 60-100 in 3rd.
Will log the 60-130 when I get a chance.
12 September 2010, 07:23 PM
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12 September 2010, 08:46 PM
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check this site out, Just put my details in and I dont think it works tbh
http://www.060calculator.com/
http://www.060calculator.com/
WTF
uh no dont think it acurate my virtually standard uk does not do 0-60 in 3.5 secs ,wish it did 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
