james04

wicked no other word for it.

what a same the dog didnt turn on them.

keith cross

iTrader: (1)

put these *******s in the cell with venables so that thay can kick f***k out of each other then set the winner alight and watch him burn f***king scum

greenonedave

I can remember when on the news it was often reported that in South Africa that a favoured form of retribution was to place a tyre around the head of that said person and then the tyre would be set alight, If people are capable of doing that what chance have any of us got ?

jjones

it probably did hence being doused in petrol and set alight

The Dogs B******s

So,your saying the dog bit them,and thats the reason it was set alight??????

Were you there????????

Torquemada

Of course......it probably went a bit like this - "oh no! My dog has tried to bite me! I must therefore tie it to a static object and burn the evil out of it at once!"

jjones

Is that in English?

jjones

not so long ago they did the same to humans

The Dogs B******s

Sorry,you no speeky our lingo

Torquemada

Seriously.....can you not see the irony...
Oh yeah, and someone's spelling or grammar are the very least of the issues here, try and bring some kind of argument to back up your, obviously well thought out, statement

It's a bl00dy aweful crime, nothing should be treated that way, end of. imho

The Dogs B******s

Not round here they didn't

jjones

ouch

jjones

try telling that to Edward Wightman

jjones

and i think the person responsible should have the same treatment done to them

The Dogs B******s

Have you just been watching Dr Who or Back To The Future????

Torquemada

Shock horror Whatever shall I do?

So, why do you reckon it would be ok to set a dog on fire for doing what dogs sometimes do? Any come back apart from the dull comments re spelling mistakes and typo's? Or just here for ***** and giggles

Torquemada

OK, fair enough, you gave up the game too early though, amatuer

Leslie

Maybe their parents should be included-for setting a bad example!

Les