Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

litchfield twin scroll turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #571  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Assuming everything else is up to the job, you would also need a set of injectors and another remap. Engine should be fine at this level.

Litchfields sell an aptly named "LM420" for your bhp needs.

Tony,
Damn I have been busted!
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 01:05 PM
  #572  
DanT20's Avatar
DanT20
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by giorgosspecc
hey guys i own o hawk eye spec-c with hks hi-power spec-r muffler a gruppe m ram air filter and sard racing radiator. oh and ecutec remap by subaru guru Bob Rawle. i'm thinking to upgrade my vf36. i want something near the 420bhp and a lot responce. what kind of turbo do you suggest? is my standard spec-c engine up the job? what else do i need for that kind of power?

I think the LM400 would be better suited for your needs, great spool and pulls very hard throughout the rev range






http://www.proplates.co.uk/
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #573  
giorgosspecc's Avatar
giorgosspecc
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

does the lm420 has o lot difference in lag than lm400? do i need a fmic? (i live in cyprus280 sunny days per year). if i do need what do you think about the aps 525.? thanks dan and shaun for your previous info.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2010 | 07:22 PM
  #574  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

FMIC will certainly help to get the best but you will lose some level of response.

Personally I will not be moving from a TMIC on my car, unless I absolutely have to and cost for gain is really worth it. Saying that, I don't live in a country that actually has temperatures greater than 15degs most of the year!

Lag wise, I suspect there will be some level of difference between those two turbos. Specifically how much (or I suspect how little) I don't know.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #575  
T20Driver's Avatar
T20Driver
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Southampton(ish)
Default

Originally Posted by giorgosspecc
does the lm420 has o lot difference in lag than lm400? do i need a fmic? (i live in cyprus280 sunny days per year). if i do need what do you think about the aps 525.? thanks dan and shaun for your previous info.
I have the 420 on a MY05 JDM STi with Iain's injector upgrade but standard air intake and top mount.

I've not been on the rollers in current state of tune but Iain and i reckon it is approx 400 and a great day 2 day option. Spool up is very very slightly later than the original turbo, but it is much stronger mid range and top end is a totally different ball game.

Put a CAI and FMIC and you will see 420 easily in my and Iain's view with practically no difference in low speed drive-ability but large other gains.

BTW ..think you need to talk about CAI and FMIC options to Iain as he has experience of which ones seem to perform better that others
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #576  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

The thing is, to upgrade to a CAI and FMIC is going to cost you a fair old whack. Too many people get bent out of shape about achieving a couple more bhp, that in reality you probably won't notice. All for the pleasure of having that graph in your hands! I have been there and done it!

However, I do appreciate that once you get to a certain level you may need to look at other ancillary options to get the best out of the turbo spec you are buying. In my view though, this is what makes something like the LM400 so appealing and why others are raving about it from a road car perspective. Minimal outlay for something that should of been on twinscroll cars out of the factory.

If you want the extra grunt then you will obviously need a bigger turbo, but there will always be a trade off with the same design of turbo against a smaller wheel/housing. Turbo's designs are specifications are getting better and better.

Litchfield's and TD are continuing to work on making them even better. Evolution stands still for no man or Subaru modder!
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 01:15 PM
  #577  
TimH's Avatar
TimH
Orange Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 3
From: JT Innovations Ltd.
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
Litchfield's and TD are continuing to work on making them even better. Evolution stands still for no man or Subaru modder!
Hmmm...wonder what they're planning for the LM480 to improve it
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #578  
stanmo's Avatar
stanmo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk
Default

Didn't someone mention billet compressor wheels ?
Potentially more nickel content - similar to alloys used in aero applications, higher temperature tolerances, less weight ?

Or variable geometry technology ?

Last edited by stanmo; Aug 4, 2010 at 03:56 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 05:06 PM
  #579  
giorgosspecc's Avatar
giorgosspecc
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

after a bit of searcing and your advice, i think will start with a syms 75mm de-cat downpipe. a forge wastegate and 600cc injectors. then save some money and go for the lm420 or hks2835. will a 2.1 L stroker kit like engine tuner kit will be helpful on making power and longevity in my spec-c engine?
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2010 | 03:14 PM
  #580  
T20Driver's Avatar
T20Driver
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Southampton(ish)
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
Too many people get bent out of shape about achieving a couple more bhp, that in reality you probably won't notice. All for the pleasure of having that graph in your hands!
Agree totally .. hence I am very happy for the moment ... with loads of headroom for more should I wish to 'add bits' in the future.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #581  
StanS's Avatar
StanS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Default

Progress update on the LM480.
Interim map yesterday with flat 1.2 bar boost gave a max of 438BHP, 430ft-lbs. But after some tweeking to increase the area under the graphs, flattening out the peaks etc it went down to about 430/420 ish.
More tweeking today
If I've understood this right, we can't go above 1.2 bar on the ecu until the Racerom version comes out as it just chops the timing back.
Will it make 480 at 1.6-7 bar ?.............

Hurry up Racerom !!!
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #582  
LitchfieldImports's Avatar
LitchfieldImports
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: www.Litchfieldimports.co.uk
Thumbs up

Great figure for low boost Stan, spoke with Alan yesterday and I could hear the car in the background Sounded great! I think they will have produced a superb engine package when it it is all finished.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #583  
bluenose172's Avatar
bluenose172
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
From: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Default

Iain, do you have any logs/graphs for the LM400 and LM420 on a 2.0 JDM. Would be nice to see a few to help me decide between the two.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 12:04 PM
  #584  
TimH's Avatar
TimH
Orange Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 3
From: JT Innovations Ltd.
Default

Originally Posted by StanS
Progress update on the LM480.
Interim map yesterday with flat 1.2 bar boost gave a max of 438BHP, 430ft-lbs. But after some tweeking to increase the area under the graphs, flattening out the peaks etc it went down to about 430/420 ish.
More tweeking today
If I've understood this right, we can't go above 1.2 bar on the ecu until the Racerom version comes out as it just chops the timing back.
Will it make 480 at 1.6-7 bar ?.............

Hurry up Racerom !!!
Intriqued that you need the racerom - is it a peculiarity of the '08 onwards ecu then, as mine's been OK using EcuTek? Is it maybe a case of the knock sensor being too sensitive and, perhaps, needing to be relocated?

Mine made 470bhp/460ft-lb as you know, with a 1.7bar peak holding 1.6bar - that's with a centre cat. So you should make your 480 (ish) OK I would say

FWIW, mine's being held back by something that I have never managed to pin down though as spool is not as good as I think it should be and I feel there should be more torque there at that boost...so I might have to dig deep and go Syvecs and then try and run with 10% meth as well
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 12:27 PM
  #585  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Tim,
It may be worth contacting Syvecs and asking if you can borrow an ECU via JGM. Even if you paid to "rent" the ecu and for JGM to map it to try, at least you won't be forking out a shedload of cash if it does not make any difference.

Where are you seeing 1bar on the road in 5th / 6th?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #586  
TimH's Avatar
TimH
Orange Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 3
From: JT Innovations Ltd.
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
Tim,
It may be worth contacting Syvecs and asking if you can borrow an ECU via JGM. Even if you paid to "rent" the ecu and for JGM to map it to try, at least you won't be forking out a shedload of cash if it does not make any difference.
Good thinking Shaun - will be meeting up with Simon at Surrey Rolling Road for a quick health check later this month, so could discuss it then.

And...late breaking news from Subaru4You...exhaust header gaskets are blowing AGAIN!! That's the second set in a few months, as well as the up and downpipe gaskets going!!!

Originally Posted by Shaun
Where are you seeing 1bar on the road in 5th / 6th?
1 bar is 3200/3300 and 1.6/1.7 about 3800rpm.

In 4th, not much happens below 4000rpm. I went out in a 480bhp 2.35 running an MD555 and it spooled 500rpm earlier than mine...which is a bit daft given the twin scroll setup and mine being a 2.5.

Or am I just expecting too much
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 05:42 PM
  #587  
T20Driver's Avatar
T20Driver
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: Southampton(ish)
Default

Re the query on the 420 ... I've just looked back at some of my previous posts in this thread and re-added them for you ..

Please keep remembering ... I've yet to get a dyno plot for my current setup.

Originally Posted by T20Driver
Went on the same rollers that I had previously been on when the car was in previous setup yesterday.

I am NOT going to give out what the 'stats' were .. because that is exactly what they are ... history ... as Iain used the data to analyse improvements that could be made .. and today we spent 2+ hours improving the map considerably.

I will however say this :

Iain's data gathering was primarily done on a MY08 JDM STi with FMIC and Induction Kit ... so don't be surprised or disappointed if you don't hit exactly the expected power levels if you haven't got those on your car ... That said ..... whoever gets one of these turbos and has it mapped properly is not going to be disappointed at all with the way the car drives .. it is simply wonderful, giving it the much needed 'grunt' that was missing mid to late revs in standard form

As an example ...

Before the improvements were made today .. an overlay on my previous standard turbo showed that spool up on the new turbo was just 100k revs later .. and it created 55 more hp by 6.3k revs. Now ... I would not be surprised if spool up is quicker AND probably generating more than 65 hp more .. or possibly even more

The original JDM STi turbo ran out of puff by 6.3k ... but this is not the case now ... it really is a great turbo and 'feels right' for the car as both a very quick daily driver, as well as more serious track car

Go on .. you know you want to ......
Originally Posted by T20Driver
I appreciate your desire for this information but believe me it would be utterly pointless ... the map now is TOTALLY different ... as is the car's performance.

As an example (if I can remember correctly) .. Iain moved the spool up to be earlier, addressed a slight dip in performance mid range as well as focusing on a drop off at high revs by a combination of adding more boost, leaning out the fuel and minimised the likelihood of ignition reduction when the temp got too hot ... ie it is a significantly different animal

Again .. as I keep saying on this forum .. talk to Iain ... especially on how each version compares .... all I can say is that he was very impressed with its performance yesterday once we'd finished the mapping for a car with no upgraded Induction or FMIC .. and he has the laptop with all the data on it ....

Furthermore .. I was grinning from ear to ear going home yesterday as well as when driving today.
Originally Posted by T20Driver
What I will show is an extract of how different the turbo performs compare to the standard at the top end .. BUT REMEMBER ... this has now been improved further

solid line is bhp ... dotted torque .. top lines of each the new turbo .. the bottom ones the old original turbo

Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 08:22 PM
  #588  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Originally Posted by tim hardisty
Good thinking Shaun - will be meeting up with Simon at Surrey Rolling Road for a quick health check later this month, so could discuss it then.

And...late breaking news from Subaru4You...exhaust header gaskets are blowing AGAIN!! That's the second set in a few months, as well as the up and downpipe gaskets going!!!

1 bar is 3200/3300 and 1.6/1.7 about 3800rpm.

In 4th, not much happens below 4000rpm. I went out in a 480bhp 2.35 running an MD555 and it spooled 500rpm earlier than mine...which is a bit daft given the twin scroll setup and mine being a 2.5.

Or am I just expecting too much
Blowing gaskets on your headers and up-pipe are really not going to help spool mate.

My total spec is quite a bit different to yours (so should not really be compared), but I see 1bar at sub 3k and 1.9bar by circa 3200/3300 (both in 5th/6th) using a single scroll 3076 core turbo making 530bhp.

Different engines and specs respond differently..... even using the same turbo, so it gets very difficult to compare on a like for like basis!

Last edited by Shaun; Aug 6, 2010 at 08:39 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2010 | 11:51 PM
  #589  
TimH's Avatar
TimH
Orange Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 3
From: JT Innovations Ltd.
Default

I still think mine's cr*p, even though the builds are different. Just wish I could work out what the problem is
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 12:51 AM
  #590  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

Would be good to compare an STI/SPEC C with stage one mods against one of these turbo conversions. At the moment it's mixed reports due to everyone having a different spec and not hitting the quoted figures . I am not really a figure chaser tbh and as long as theres a noticeable improvment i'll be happy. The LM400 seems very similar to the vf42 which provides great punch from low down ,but is stronger in mid and hi rev range.
Any of you guy slocal to Manchester?

Immy
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 01:13 AM
  #591  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

Immy,
I will be doing stage 1 mods and testing a couple of these turbos, on my JDM Hawkeye in due course. Watch out for my next project thread!
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 01:46 AM
  #592  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
Immy,
I will be doing stage 1 mods and testing a couple of these turbos, on my JDM Hawkeye in due course. Watch out for my next project thread!

Cant wait
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #593  
StanS's Avatar
StanS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Default

Originally Posted by tim hardisty
Intriqued that you need the racerom - is it a peculiarity of the '08 onwards ecu then, as mine's been OK using EcuTek? Is it maybe a case of the knock sensor being too sensitive and, perhaps, needing to be relocated?
Mine made 470bhp/460ft-lb as you know, with a 1.7bar peak holding 1.6bar - that's with a centre cat. So you should make your 480 (ish) OK I would say
FWIW, mine's being held back by something that I have never managed to pin down though as spool is not as good as I think it should be and I feel there should be more torque there at that boost...so I might have to dig deep and go Syvecs and then try and run with 10% meth as well
Think the problem is "08 on" specific. Whenever Martyn tried to use more boost or extend rev range, engine seemed to cut out. No idea about knock sensor or how this ecu works (or doesn't) and as Martyn in liaison with Ecutek couldn't sort it, it must be fairly major.
Hope you sort yours soon - must be incredibly frustrating

Last edited by StanS; Aug 7, 2010 at 04:12 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #594  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

If anybody is interested in hearing more about the Litchfield Twin Entry turbos, then be advised to subscribe to this project thread.

https://www.scoobynet.com/projects-4...ml#post9544258

DEFCON 1 has just been enabled, which means we don't have long until DEFCON 5 is on the cards!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #595  
Jay m A's Avatar
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 1
From: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Default

Originally Posted by tim hardisty
I still think mine's cr*p, even though the builds are different. Just wish I could work out what the problem is
Are there any other cars with your turbo that you can compare with? Whats the best spool they achieve? sorry if this has been covered before, I haven't read the whole thread
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #596  
rich-ita's Avatar
rich-ita
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bluenose172
Iain, do you have any logs/graphs for the LM400 and LM420 on a 2.0 JDM. Would be nice to see a few to help me decide between the two.
i have the same "problem". I can't decide how of these turbo is best in spool/performances.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2010 | 12:09 PM
  #597  
Shaun's Avatar
Shaun
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 24
From: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Default

I will have some very soon from my own car!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #598  
sound of turbo's Avatar
sound of turbo
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

hi guys,

just ordered a LM500-L70 from Iain. options : Race Bronze bearing carrier, 76mm Ported Shroud Compressor Cover, SFS 76mm Turbo intake Hose.

it is for my GC8 22b widebody (4 doors). roll cage (12points). 2 Recaro Pole-po. PSS9. 6pots/355 front brakes, rear STI7 brembo / dba. full STI7 jdm gearbox, rear transmi. OZ magnesium wheels (8*18 ET12) change for Rota P45R or Grid to put bigger tyres (=> 245/35/18)

- EJ257 semi-closed, OE crank, cosworth tri-metal, cosworth connecting rods, Wossner pistons
- GC8 EJ20 heads, handwork to put safely on an EJ257, polished intake & exhaust chamber, cosworth performance springs
- cometics & ARP
- Spec C oil pan to fit a TS header (ordered a Tomei TS but with what i read i've make a mystake...)
- reverse plenum
- Lateral perf Fmic/cooling combo (very small piping)
- walbro - PE850cc- // rails - AN braided fuel lines and AN hose-ends.

receive it next week if no problem.

give you some news as soon as possible

Aurelien
France

Last edited by sound of turbo; Aug 29, 2010 at 01:59 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #599  
TimH's Avatar
TimH
Orange Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 3
From: JT Innovations Ltd.
Default

Originally Posted by sound of turbo
hi guys,

just ordered a LM500-L70 from Iain. options : Race Bronze bearing carrier, 76mm Ported Shroud Compressor Cover, SFS 76mm Turbo intake Hose.

it is for my GC8 22b widebody (4 doors). roll cage (12points). 2 Recaro Pole-po. PSS9. 6pots/355 front brakes, rear STI7 brembo / dba. full STI7 jdm gearbox, rear transmi. OZ magnesium wheels (8*18 ET12) change for Rota P45R or Grid to put bigger tyres (=> 245/35/18)

- EJ257 semi-closed, OE crank, cosworth tri-metal, cosworth connecting rods, Wossner pistons
- GC8 EJ20 heads, handwork to put safely on an EJ257, polished intake & exhaust chamber, cosworth performance springs
- cometics & ARP
- Spec C oil pan to fit a TS header (ordered a Tomei TS but with what i read i've make a mystake...)
- reverse plenum
- Lateral perf Fmic/cooling combo (very small piping)
- walbro - PE850cc- // rails - AN braided fuel lines and AN hose-ends.

receive it next week if no problem.

give you some news as soon as possible

Aurelien
France
Nice one

There are two types of Tomei headers - the original and most common ones, designed for EJ20; and a newer design, now using the same pipe diameters as the OE twinscroll headers, much better for an EJ257 in my opinion.

I used the EJ20-style ones on my 2.5 and it definitely didn't spool as well, and knocked top end power, compared to the OEMs that I eventually went back to. In my case an expensive mistake as I'd had the Tomei ones ceramic coated as well

Can't wait to see what results you get
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #600  
sound of turbo's Avatar
sound of turbo
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

arff on the tomei website i only saw the 2.0l in twinscroll...

a 2.5l twin scroll is available?
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 AM.