Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Hamiltons appeal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 September 2008, 09:25 AM
  #61  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by cster
I find it a little strange that a penalty retrospectively issued after a race has been completed cannot be appealed.
Drive through penalties cannot be appealed as far as understand it.

Originally Posted by cster
The other thing I find amusing is that Ferrari are happy to win races in this manner.
Thats a bit like say Man U Vs Chelsea and Man U winning because Chelsea scored an own goal.
Every team no matter what sport will take a victory regardless of how its earned.
Old 24 September 2008, 11:46 AM
  #62  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 22BUK
I wouldn't be surprised if the little **** doesn't play the "race" card next...
Your post is an indication that you are the one to play the race card!

The whole business is a fix and is a dreadful letdown of the administrators of the sport and their ambitions.

Les
Old 24 September 2008, 11:59 AM
  #63  
^Qwerty^
Scooby Regular
 
^Qwerty^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Didn't Massa break the rules at the first corner from the start then?
Old 24 September 2008, 12:11 PM
  #64  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
So F1 fans are not intelligent? What a stupid thing to say.
Your words - not mine
You seem to imply that F1 fans think F1 is a sport and not a show more akin to WWF smackdown
Old 24 September 2008, 12:21 PM
  #65  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ^Qwerty^
Didn't Massa break the rules at the first corner from the start then?
How?
Old 24 September 2008, 12:42 PM
  #66  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"The only successful appeal in F1 history came when Ferrari's Eddie Irvine and Michael Schumacher were disqualified from first and second places over a bargeboard infringement in the 1999 Malaysian Grand Prix, but subsequently re-in stated."

Says it all doesnt it
Old 24 September 2008, 01:01 PM
  #67  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jaytc2003
"The only successful appeal in F1 history came when Ferrari's Eddie Irvine and Michael Schumacher were disqualified from first and second places over a bargeboard infringement in the 1999 Malaysian Grand Prix, but subsequently re-in stated."

Says it all doesnt it
And if you have any understanding of the technical regulation in F1 at the time, you would realise that there was and always had been a 5mm allowence for manufacturing irregularities. All Ferrari did was to point this out to the court and quite rightly, the appeal was upheld.

Hmm, what happened to Schumacher (in his Ferrari) at Jerez 97, Canada 98, France, 2003 etc etc.....?

Do some research before mouthing off.
Old 24 September 2008, 01:09 PM
  #68  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
Hmm, what happened to Schumacher (in his Ferrari) at Jerez 97, Canada 98, France, 2003 etc etc.....?


Do some research before mouthing off.
argh ferrari fan boy alert, read my post. Take a step back, and read it again. Should I translate it.

"If your not ferrari then forget about an appeal"

Of course we could mention the illegal floor at the Australian grand prix couldnt we
Schumacher mistaking demolition derby for F1

but no this thread is about the appeal
Old 24 September 2008, 01:14 PM
  #69  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fine. Let's talk about the appeal. The rules, that every team signs and agrees to state that a timed or drive-through penalty cannot be apealled against.

What's the problem? Infact, why did Hamilton waste his time going when he could have been preparing for this weekends race? Their solicitors need shooting.
Old 24 September 2008, 01:20 PM
  #70  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
Fine. Let's talk about the appeal. The rules, that every team signs and agrees to state that a timed or drive-through penalty cannot be apealled against.

What's the problem? Infact, why did Hamilton waste his time going when he could have been preparing for this weekends race? Their solicitors need shooting.
Research

"

Following the 2007 Japanese Grand Prix at Fuji, Scuderia Toro Rosso's Vitantonio Liuzzi was penalised 25 seconds for having overtaken the Spyker of Adrian Sutil under waved yellow flags in the late stages of the race. Whilst the Ferrari-powered squad was permitted to appeal the punishment - denying it at the time what was its first point of the season - McLaren was not afforded the same grace, sending Formula 1's conspiracy theorists into overdrive once more and adding further fuel to the fire for those who believe the FIA is biased towards Maranello"


Old 24 September 2008, 01:30 PM
  #71  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jaytc2003
Research

"

Following the 2007 Japanese Grand Prix at Fuji, Scuderia Toro Rosso's Vitantonio Liuzzi was penalised 25 seconds for having overtaken the Spyker of Adrian Sutil under waved yellow flags in the late stages of the race. Whilst the Ferrari-powered squad was permitted to appeal the punishment - denying it at the time what was its first point of the season - McLaren was not afforded the same grace, sending Formula 1's conspiracy theorists into overdrive once more and adding further fuel to the fire for those who believe the FIA is biased towards Maranello"


Did you see the race at Fuji last year? I'd like to see if you could have spotted the yellow flags because nobody else could! Oh hang on, sorry, I forgot. You conspirators don't like to talk about facts do you?
Old 24 September 2008, 01:45 PM
  #72  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jaytc2003
Of course we could mention the illegal floor at the Australian grand prix couldnt we

Schumacher mistaking demolition derby for F1

but no this thread is about the appeal
Malaysia 1999 was wrong. Sorry but even as a Ferrari fan I didn't agree with that appeal being upheld. The car was out of spec and Ferrari's argument of it not being enough to make a difference just shouldn't have mattered. It was out of spec. End of.

As for the floor, it wasn't illegal, it passed scrutineering in Australia. Then the FIA ruled against it and Ferrari removed it. They never ran with it on the car when it was illegal.

Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
Old 24 September 2008, 02:00 PM
  #73  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Malaysia 1999 was wrong. Sorry but even as a Ferrari fan I didn't agree with that appeal being upheld. The car was out of spec and Ferrari's argument of it not being enough to make a difference just shouldn't have mattered. It was out of spec. End of.

As for the floor, it wasn't illegal, it passed scrutineering in Australia. Then the FIA ruled against it and Ferrari removed it. They never ran with it on the car when it was illegal.

Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
Or don't want to admit to it!
Old 24 September 2008, 02:19 PM
  #74  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
with the demo derbies I was referring to hill in 94 (think it was 94) and also against villeneuve (97 was it?)

I dont mind aggressive driving, but barging is a diff matter, anyway its about the appeal which you are sort of keeping with
Old 24 September 2008, 02:20 PM
  #75  
jaytc2003
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jaytc2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
Did you see the race at Fuji last year? I'd like to see if you could have spotted the yellow flags because nobody else could! Oh hang on, sorry, I forgot. You conspirators don't like to talk about facts do you?
thats a good point, however my post wasnt about not seeing the yellows but merely the fact that they were allowed to appeal
Old 24 September 2008, 04:24 PM
  #76  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by urban
Drive through penalties cannot be appealed as far as understand it.
Am I missing something here?
I can understand a drive through penalty appeal being not permitted, as the drive through would occur before the race had ended and would thus be difficult to reverse.
This does not apply in this case as (whatever the FIA want to say) the penalty was a 25 second penalty applied after the race.
In not allowing the appeal, the FIA is having a laugh at anyone who takes this F1 show seriously.
The machination by which the penalty came about in the first place and the perverse lack of any sense of natural justice is another matter altogether.
Still, makes for an exiting run into the final races
Maybe I should watch MotoGP - they actually let them race on the track and pass and everything!
Old 24 September 2008, 04:58 PM
  #77  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Miniman
Lol, never said I did, I'm perfectly happy to say I have an opinion about what a third party should be doing at a hearing, but in fact I see no point in this thread where I have expressed an opinion so there is no need to keep telling me I don't know what I'm talking about.
Nowhere did I say or imply you didn't know what you were talking about, if you took something I said that way you are wrong and there isn't much I can do about that.

Originally Posted by Miniman
However you conjected why Ferrari where there at the Court of Appeal, then refused to elaborate further, then blaming it on FIA rules as though it had nothing to do with you.
I explained to the readers of the thread and your good self that any team is allowed to have representation at any appeal hearing. That is fact not conjecture. It is a decision of the FIA and in actual fact is nothing to do with me so you got that right.

Originally Posted by Miniman
If you cannot say how the FIA Court of appeal works or will not give an opinion, then there is no need to comment on why Ferrari were there in the in first place, IMO.
Er but I do know why Ferrari were there while I don't know how the court of appeal works internally as I have never been to a hearing. So I commented on what I did know about and said what I didn't know about.

Originally Posted by Miniman
Of course this is an open forum so you can say whatever you like and discuss anything to any point where you feel like not participating any more (as is your right), but that's kind of convenient, huh?
Not convenient. Just don't think i can add anything to this aspect of the debate. Your quote that seemed to fuel this was thus:

Originally Posted by Miniman
And presumably keep quiet unless draw into it?
All I said was I really don't know. Ferrari may be there to stir things up or for their own protection. I have no idea. What I do know is that neither Ferrari or McLaren are whiter than white and if I was either team I would be at an appeal hearing for the other just in case. As to whether they should keep quiet on the face of it it seems logical, but maybe there is more to it than that. As I said I don't kmow.

Anyway sorry you seem to think I was accusing you of not knowing what you were talking about. I wasn't. Just enjoying the gentle Ferrari vs McLaren fan banter of these F1 threads. Beats dissing Gordon brown over and over LOL
Old 24 September 2008, 05:17 PM
  #78  
MooseRacer
Scooby Regular
 
MooseRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
Spot on, and it's that which will see him achieve great things - and annoy a lot of people on the way (just not most Brits).
Old 24 September 2008, 05:24 PM
  #79  
spireite
BANNED
 
spireite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well its Bernies scalextric so he can make up his own rules
Old 24 September 2008, 05:54 PM
  #80  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by spireite
Well its Bernies scalextric so he can make up his own rules
By Jove, I think this man has cracked it!

Last edited by cster; 24 September 2008 at 05:56 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
andy97
Computer & Technology Related
12
16 September 2015 08:07 PM
HunterB
Non Scooby Related
2
28 June 2000 06:44 PM



Quick Reply: Hamiltons appeal



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.