Hamiltons appeal
#62
#64
#66
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The only successful appeal in F1 history came when Ferrari's Eddie Irvine and Michael Schumacher were disqualified from first and second places over a bargeboard infringement in the 1999 Malaysian Grand Prix, but subsequently re-in stated."
Says it all doesnt it
Says it all doesnt it
#67
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm, what happened to Schumacher (in his Ferrari) at Jerez 97, Canada 98, France, 2003 etc etc.....?
Do some research before mouthing off.
#68
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"If your not ferrari then forget about an appeal"
Of course we could mention the illegal floor at the Australian grand prix couldnt we
Schumacher mistaking demolition derby for F1
but no this thread is about the appeal
#69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fine. Let's talk about the appeal. The rules, that every team signs and agrees to state that a timed or drive-through penalty cannot be apealled against.
What's the problem? Infact, why did Hamilton waste his time going when he could have been preparing for this weekends race? Their solicitors need shooting.
What's the problem? Infact, why did Hamilton waste his time going when he could have been preparing for this weekends race? Their solicitors need shooting.
#70
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fine. Let's talk about the appeal. The rules, that every team signs and agrees to state that a timed or drive-through penalty cannot be apealled against.
What's the problem? Infact, why did Hamilton waste his time going when he could have been preparing for this weekends race? Their solicitors need shooting.
What's the problem? Infact, why did Hamilton waste his time going when he could have been preparing for this weekends race? Their solicitors need shooting.
"
Following the 2007 Japanese Grand Prix at Fuji, Scuderia Toro Rosso's Vitantonio Liuzzi was penalised 25 seconds for having overtaken the Spyker of Adrian Sutil under waved yellow flags in the late stages of the race. Whilst the Ferrari-powered squad was permitted to appeal the punishment - denying it at the time what was its first point of the season - McLaren was not afforded the same grace, sending Formula 1's conspiracy theorists into overdrive once more and adding further fuel to the fire for those who believe the FIA is biased towards Maranello"
#71
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Research
"
Following the 2007 Japanese Grand Prix at Fuji, Scuderia Toro Rosso's Vitantonio Liuzzi was penalised 25 seconds for having overtaken the Spyker of Adrian Sutil under waved yellow flags in the late stages of the race. Whilst the Ferrari-powered squad was permitted to appeal the punishment - denying it at the time what was its first point of the season - McLaren was not afforded the same grace, sending Formula 1's conspiracy theorists into overdrive once more and adding further fuel to the fire for those who believe the FIA is biased towards Maranello"
"
Following the 2007 Japanese Grand Prix at Fuji, Scuderia Toro Rosso's Vitantonio Liuzzi was penalised 25 seconds for having overtaken the Spyker of Adrian Sutil under waved yellow flags in the late stages of the race. Whilst the Ferrari-powered squad was permitted to appeal the punishment - denying it at the time what was its first point of the season - McLaren was not afforded the same grace, sending Formula 1's conspiracy theorists into overdrive once more and adding further fuel to the fire for those who believe the FIA is biased towards Maranello"
#72
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the floor, it wasn't illegal, it passed scrutineering in Australia. Then the FIA ruled against it and Ferrari removed it. They never ran with it on the car when it was illegal.
Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
#73
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Malaysia 1999 was wrong. Sorry but even as a Ferrari fan I didn't agree with that appeal being upheld. The car was out of spec and Ferrari's argument of it not being enough to make a difference just shouldn't have mattered. It was out of spec. End of.
As for the floor, it wasn't illegal, it passed scrutineering in Australia. Then the FIA ruled against it and Ferrari removed it. They never ran with it on the car when it was illegal.
Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
As for the floor, it wasn't illegal, it passed scrutineering in Australia. Then the FIA ruled against it and Ferrari removed it. They never ran with it on the car when it was illegal.
Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
#74
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manchester ish
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
I dont mind aggressive driving, but barging is a diff matter, anyway its about the appeal which you are sort of keeping with
#76
Am I missing something here?
I can understand a drive through penalty appeal being not permitted, as the drive through would occur before the race had ended and would thus be difficult to reverse.
This does not apply in this case as (whatever the FIA want to say) the penalty was a 25 second penalty applied after the race.
In not allowing the appeal, the FIA is having a laugh at anyone who takes this F1 show seriously.
The machination by which the penalty came about in the first place and the perverse lack of any sense of natural justice is another matter altogether.
Still, makes for an exiting run into the final races
Maybe I should watch MotoGP - they actually let them race on the track and pass and everything!
I can understand a drive through penalty appeal being not permitted, as the drive through would occur before the race had ended and would thus be difficult to reverse.
This does not apply in this case as (whatever the FIA want to say) the penalty was a 25 second penalty applied after the race.
In not allowing the appeal, the FIA is having a laugh at anyone who takes this F1 show seriously.
The machination by which the penalty came about in the first place and the perverse lack of any sense of natural justice is another matter altogether.
Still, makes for an exiting run into the final races
Maybe I should watch MotoGP - they actually let them race on the track and pass and everything!
#77
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, never said I did, I'm perfectly happy to say I have an opinion about what a third party should be doing at a hearing, but in fact I see no point in this thread where I have expressed an opinion so there is no need to keep telling me I don't know what I'm talking about.
All I said was I really don't know. Ferrari may be there to stir things up or for their own protection. I have no idea. What I do know is that neither Ferrari or McLaren are whiter than white and if I was either team I would be at an appeal hearing for the other just in case. As to whether they should keep quiet on the face of it it seems logical, but maybe there is more to it than that. As I said I don't kmow.
Anyway sorry you seem to think I was accusing you of not knowing what you were talking about. I wasn't. Just enjoying the gentle Ferrari vs McLaren fan banter of these F1 threads. Beats dissing Gordon brown over and over LOL
#78
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Finally Schumacher and demolition derbies. You might wnat to take a look at Hamilton's moves in Monza particulalrly the horrid job he did of passing Webber. No complaints from me as it's racing, but you can't hold him up as some sort of saint and condemn Schuey in the same breath. They are cut from the same cloth, but people just can't see it yet.
#80
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
andy97
Computer & Technology Related
12
16 September 2015 08:07 PM