Notices

Front mount..... lag

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 April 2007, 01:07 PM
  #31  
funkyspider
Scooby Regular
 
funkyspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lancashire & District Subaru Owners
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some say it's worth replacing that standard black TMIC->Throttle body short pipe with a samco whilst it's off as the samco is a bit more flexible when putting it back on (and looks sexier). I haven't done mine yet - but had a good look round as I was going to a cpl months ago - before I bought morettes instead
Old 19 April 2007, 01:30 PM
  #32  
Andy Stevens
Scooby Regular
 
Andy Stevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Damocell
Correct me if I'm wrong, but spool is the point in the rev range that the turbo produces boost, lag if the time it take for the turbo to spool from no boost to full boost when you hit the throttle higher in the rev range.

See here under "What is turbo lag (and how do I avoid it)?"

Turbochargers 101

Damo
The figures quoted were in comparison to the initial post where a similar set up (FMIC, td05) had a very different boost curve (1bar at 4300rpm vs 1.6bar at 3700rpm), to illustrate that solenoid duty can have a dramatic effect on the common usage of the term lag (there are other factors at play however, the two setups will breathe differently due to differing heads).

Throttle response can also be hindered by stalling the compressor wheel as well as the longer induction path. The extra volume associated with a FMIC needs a very large bore vent (or two) to stop the wheel slowing when the throttle plate is closed. Compressor stall makes a distinctive noise, especially with an IK, so you will be aware if it is happening. A FMIC can also present a rich spike as the injectors react to the load signal generated by the AFM before the pulse is present at the inlet manifold. We are playing with a way of mapping that out on the JECS, I believe other ECUs have throttle enrichment adjustments that may mitigate that behaviour.

Driving style can also play a part; I tend to apply throttle before the apex to ensure I have boost available at the exit of a corner. Not ideal, but in mitigation the AWD system and road chassis is not as sensitive in yaw to throttle input as a mid engined rear drive racecar/caterfield/go kart.

Lastly, and presumably the reason why they were fitted in the first place, a FMIC is a good thing in terms of stabilising inlet temps, reliably allowing a bit of extra advance. A few hard runs on a TMIC and increased knock activity is not uncommon, throwing another variable into the mix.

As ever, either route is a compromise!
Old 19 April 2007, 07:51 PM
  #33  
daijones
Scooby Regular
 
daijones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by funkyspider
Here's a good guide on fitting STI8 TMIC to a classic. I should imagine the fitment back onto a newage would be very similar, just ignore the bits where they needed to modify to get it on. Apparently two big screwdrivers and brute strength are the key to getting it seperated from the throttle body pipe - and heating it up to make it pliable is the key to getting it back on.

https://www.scoobynet.com/projects-4...0-classic.html
Nice one, cheers

D
Old 20 April 2007, 12:18 AM
  #34  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

do you mean to say, that even running with one of the latest OE TMIC and associated hardware, a Classic cannot produce similar thermal efficiency to a New Age car?

The Scoobyclinic Classic 25B runs a large Hyperflow TMIC with around 480/460 IIRC from its 2.5L
s5ooob : you may not have understood what I posted.

You cannot compare the performance of the latest OE TMICs with those of earlier models.
ie. The Classic TMIC, even the STi 5 and 6 had difficulty maintaining reasonable induction temperatures, even on unmodified cars. The New Age cars have far better performing TMICs and STi 8s etc benefit from bigger scoops that make an additional improvement.
Fitting an STi 8 TMIC to a Classic is a beneficial move but to get best results you must also fit the underbonnet tray (or make an alternative) along with a bigger scoop. However an efficient FMIC will outperform any O/E TMIC so far in terms of charge temperature stability.

Incidentally, what are the air charge temperatures seen on the 480 bhp Scooby Clinic car?

Last edited by harvey; 20 April 2007 at 12:20 AM.
Old 23 April 2007, 12:16 PM
  #35  
borat52
Scooby Regular
 
borat52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Borat - I am currently running a MD321T which for its size spools very well, not quite as quick as a 20G which on a 2.5 spools like a td04 on a 2.0


Andy
I used to have a TD04 in my standard jdm classic wagon and loved the way the boost came in early. If the 20g on the 2.5 is like the TD04 on a 2.0, would you say the MD321T was akin to a TD05 on a 2l in terms of spool? I dont think I could live day to day with anything that spooled later than a TD05 on a 2l.
Also what would you think the max safe torque would be through a sti-UK 6 speeder as a rule of thumb?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
techdw
ScoobyNet General
12
28 September 2015 07:09 AM



Quick Reply: Front mount..... lag



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 AM.