Art.50 IS reversible.... But only on the EU-27 side i.e. they (ALL 27 member states? ) would have to agree to it.

The 'leaving state' doesn't have the power to reverse it. It's out of its hands.

So, rather like a dog with its tail between its legs, all the UK could request is, "Please EU, can we rejoin again...?"

 

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-...-jeremy-corbyn

 

Pure genius.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ind...136.html%3Famp

What an absolute bloody mess!

 

So it seems she lied to the Queen as she did NOT have an agreement with DUP so was not in a position to form a government.

That's probably a capital offence or, at the very least, 10 years in the Tower on bread and water.

Take her down.

dl

 

Someone with a bit of dosh needs to form a Party called "Get these ****wits out" and a broad mandate of getting out of Europe, rewarding folk who are willing to help themselves, not try to rip off those who find themselves in unfortunate circumstances and tell the work shy to go **** themselves !

Landslide should follow !

 

Just shows how low people will stoop for power, trying to join with a party whose beliefs are the sort of things we've been working hard to remove from modern society.

 

And lead by a women who was responsible for a total screw up of a green subsidy which could cost the country half a billion

dl

 

That is fantastic - hahahahaha

 

I'm surprised no one jumped on that one, would be ideal ammunition for a vote of no confidence.

 

the DUP political views are basically the Bible with bin collections on Wednesdays

 

ffs, election is done, cons won, labour came close but lost, now lets move on and sort brexit out without finding every potential loop hole to try to cause trouble and argue the case after its already done and dusted. That arguing is what has caused the pound to tank etc

 

Biblical literalism and staunch nationalism. A heady mix.

 

Not forgetting the paramilitary backing!

 

My thoughts. Oddly enough my niece is marrying the son of a well known and senior Labour MP and they will be having a small luncheon party together this Wednesday. I've asked my sister to have a word in the MP's shell-like and suggest that be asks Corbyn to request a no confidence vote. I think it would be hard for Mr Speaker to refuse this and it just needs a few Tories to be out of town....... Watch this space

David

 

You really have sunk to a new low David.

 

Fortunately not down to your level. Please grow up

David

PS. So you think it's OK to LIE to the Queen?

 

Religion is the problem of the modern world, outdated views based around an imaginary being.

 

What a load of bollox! Is it dementia or stupidity? Or both?

 

How do you know what was said to the queen ?

As far as I know the party with the most votes asks the queen to form a government - That's all she did as far as we all know.

I suspect the Queen couldn't give a shiny ****e which plebs make up her government

 

Please follow the news, dl

 

Dave, what evidence do you have that TM lied to the Queen?

I think you're being a bit hysterical matey

 

Martin, I thought you were better than this....

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2017..._17036730.html

https://citifmonline.com/2017/06/09/...h-dup-backing/

May DID NOT have an agreement with DUP when she went to palace.

Not hysterical - this is important matey..

dl

 

David, as I understand it, it's irrelevant if she had an agreement with the DUP at the time.

The only question the queen asks is 'can you form a government'.

It's up to the opposition parties to vote 'no confidence', not the queen.

 

FFS of course even I understand it's not the Queen asking for vote. Don't treat me like the Alcazar or Peedee school boys

May told Queenie that she would be able to form a government with a majority when in fact she would have needed more support that she could count on. This was a deception. d

 

Dave, you seem to be getting very hot under the collar here.

Where did I say anything about the queen asking for a vote Dave?

How can you possibly know what she told the queen?

If this was really a 'thing' then do you not think it would be front and centre of every news report, tabloid headline and social media feed.
It isn't, because it isn't a 'thing' at all.

The PM does not need a majority to form a government, and it's up to parliament what happens from there.

 

I think the poor dear has finally become hysterical...and I'm using the old old dictionary definition here.

Do I think it's OK to lie to the queen, David? Sure I do, being as I think the entire royal family are simply a bunch of scroungers who need to get proper jobs!
But TM didn't. Simple.

 

ASFAIK You don't need a majority to form a government - as Cons got the most votes she is entitled to go to the Queen 'first' and say she 'intends' to form a government...

If she can then not form a government she is happy with, or she fails a vote of no confidence then Lab as second placed can then also go to the Queen and form a Minority government.

 

This is true, although it does make things rather difficult.

 

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...6ef557bec1.jpg


Oh No ! not another one !