Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

VW Golf R400

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 May 2015, 10:08 PM
  #31  
Saxo Boy
Scooby Regular
 
Saxo Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There seems to be quite a lot of hate for the new breed of hot-hatches and I note many comparisons to the Scooby's and Evo's from 10-15 years ago.

Sure, at 300bhp the Golf R is nothing special when a PPP STI had the same power over 10 years ago. However, the difference is that you can have your cake and eat it these days. when I had a 300bhp Subaru I'd get 22-25mpg, it needed serviced every 5 minutes and it was compromised in many areas (build quality, etc). I used mines as an every day car covering 25,000 miles annually and it was really hard to justify. The costs were astronomical and I always lived in fear of it going bang.

These days you can get 300bhp+ hatches with excellent build quality, longer servicing intervals, full warranty coverage and far better fuel economy. On the basis that I love quick cars, I'd have no qualms at all about doing 25k miles a year in one of the current hot hatches.
Old 15 May 2015, 01:56 AM
  #32  
Beastie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Beastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,397
Received 17 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I have registered my interest, I can already see:

1) Excellent refinement.
2) Better economy
3) Lower road tax
4) room for the dog

If its too expensive for its size, I will be looking at the Mercedes CLA AMG Shooting Brake.

Old 15 May 2015, 07:02 AM
  #33  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Saxo Boy
There seems to be quite a lot of hate for the new breed of hot-hatches and I note many comparisons to the Scooby's and Evo's from 10-15 years ago.

Sure, at 300bhp the Golf R is nothing special when a PPP STI had the same power over 10 years ago. However, the difference is that you can have your cake and eat it these days. when I had a 300bhp Subaru I'd get 22-25mpg, it needed serviced every 5 minutes and it was compromised in many areas (build quality, etc). I used mines as an every day car covering 25,000 miles annually and it was really hard to justify. The costs were astronomical and I always lived in fear of it going bang.

These days you can get 300bhp+ hatches with excellent build quality, longer servicing intervals, full warranty coverage and far better fuel economy. On the basis that I love quick cars, I'd have no qualms at all about doing 25k miles a year in one of the current hot hatches.
My M135i is on almost 17k miles; still 4500 miles until its first service! And we get mid 30s to the gallon on a long run. Not bad for a 3.0 six pot turbo (twin scroll) with 320bhp (most are 340 when run in).
Old 15 May 2015, 09:32 AM
  #34  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Manufacturers can try and rewrite the rules,.
and initially they were 112BHP from a 1.6 in the MK1 Golf - and what a hoot to drive
Old 15 May 2015, 10:17 AM
  #35  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
and initially they were 112BHP from a 1.6 in the MK1 Golf - and what a hoot to drive
Exactly. Manufacturers are going the wrong way playing the horse power game. You only need a car that's light weight and with modest power and grip with an agile feelsom chassis to enjoy driving on todays congested roads. I know some will argue its "progress", but 400bhp in a hatchback chassis based on a platform designed for space efficiency to transport families and shopping aided with tons of sophisticated electronic nannying to keep you on the road? Its limits will be so high that that you'd have to be doing some serious speed (quite possibly dangerous too) to get any sense of involvement in the driving.
Old 15 May 2015, 12:16 PM
  #36  
Neanderthal
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northampton, Xbox GamerTag - Neanderthal1976
Posts: 6,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Exactly. Manufacturers are going the wrong way playing the horse power game. You only need a car that's light weight and with modest power and grip with an agile feelsom chassis to enjoy driving on todays congested roads. I know some will argue its "progress", but 400bhp in a hatchback chassis based on a platform designed for space efficiency to transport families and shopping aided with tons of sophisticated electronic nannying to keep you on the road? Its limits will be so high that that you'd have to be doing some serious speed (quite possibly dangerous too) to get any sense of involvement in the driving.
^^^^ this x1000
Old 15 May 2015, 07:45 PM
  #37  
stilover
Scooby Regular
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Exactly. Manufacturers are going the wrong way playing the horse power game. You only need a car that's light weight and with modest power and grip with an agile feelsom chassis to enjoy driving on todays congested roads. I know some will argue its "progress", but 400bhp in a hatchback chassis based on a platform designed for space efficiency to transport families and shopping aided with tons of sophisticated electronic nannying to keep you on the road? Its limits will be so high that that you'd have to be doing some serious speed (quite possibly dangerous too) to get any sense of involvement in the driving.
Unfortunately people want more space = Larger car = more weight

People want more kit = More weight

People want better crash protection = Lots more weight

With extra weight, you have to add more power just to get the same performance. And as new cars should always be faster, more spacious, more equipped, and safer, even more power is needed.

The only saving grace is that engines have become far more frugal, even with 3 times the power of cars 15 years ago.
Old 15 May 2015, 09:32 PM
  #38  
thenewgalaxy
Scooby Regular
 
thenewgalaxy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lancuntshire
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
You only need a car that's light weight and with modest power and grip with an agile feelsom chassis to enjoy driving on todays congested roads. I know some will argue its "progress", but 400bhp in a hatchback chassis... Its limits will be so high that that you'd have to be doing some serious speed (quite possibly dangerous too) to get any sense of involvement in the driving.
Totally, 100% agree.

I've been alternating daily between the Cosworth and the S202 for about the last four weeks.

The S202 is more "fun" but the Cosworth is a much quicker car. To get the same edge of the seat thrills you need to drive at very antisocial speeds.
Old 15 May 2015, 10:28 PM
  #39  
555)
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
555)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Red Light District
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

preza is dead, i dont miss my twin scroll hawkeye cheap tat now i think about it

£60 got 319 miles out my golf r dsg drive it fast a lot of the time

ill be ordering a golf r420 110%
Old 16 May 2015, 03:26 PM
  #40  
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
jameswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 6,535
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Not sure why anyone thinks it's a good idea to change the oil on a high performance car every 20k miles, no matter what the manufacturers say. If I owned one I'd be changing the oil way more often than that.
Old 04 August 2015, 01:05 PM
  #41  
matt-c
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
matt-c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,531
Received 118 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

VW have started canvassing interested parties as to colours, no of doors and transmission type they would want on R400/25.

Speculation suggests they are thinking of initiating production soon, or at least making decision soon.
Old 04 August 2015, 01:21 PM
  #42  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by matt-c
VW have started canvassing interested parties as to colours, no of doors and transmission type they would want on R400/25.

Speculation suggests they are thinking of initiating production soon, or at least making decision soon.
Wish they'd canvass me...I want the 5cylinder (or a blown VR6) engine with a proper manual gearbox, please.

There's only so much a "soundaktor" can do to hide the fact the 4 cylinder engines don't sound any more special than a GTi with a filter and an aftermaket backbox. Part of what makes a car special is the noise it makes.

Last edited by ALi-B; 04 August 2015 at 01:22 PM.
Old 04 August 2015, 01:59 PM
  #43  
JPS1
Scooby Newbie
 
JPS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Leeds
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I suspect most of the people buying this car initially will be thinking of making a quick buck! Dealers and private individuals selling on to jump the waiting list. I also suspect it will be sold in tiny numbers so depreciation should not be a worry!

There will be absolutely no lease deals on this model unlike the R.......and it will be closer to £50,000 than £40,000

I registered my interest over 6 months ago and nobody would take any form of deposit.....to be fair to the dealers nobody really knew what was happening and probably still don't.

I hate to say it but probably a future classic!
Old 04 August 2015, 02:36 PM
  #44  
matt-c
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
matt-c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,531
Received 118 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPS1
I suspect most of the people buying this car initially will be thinking of making a quick buck! Dealers and private individuals selling on to jump the waiting list. I also suspect it will be sold in tiny numbers so depreciation should not be a worry!

There will be absolutely no lease deals on this model unlike the R.......and it will be closer to £50,000 than £40,000

I registered my interest over 6 months ago and nobody would take any form of deposit.....to be fair to the dealers nobody really knew what was happening and probably still don't.

I hate to say it but probably a future classic!
I suggest you contact your dealer now then. As i said, they are asking questions to those who showed an interest.
Old 04 August 2015, 03:14 PM
  #45  
JPS1
Scooby Newbie
 
JPS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Leeds
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I should have said in my last post "Its not for me now"


After seeing the spy photos in the press I don't think it looks different enough now from stock the Golf R...


The first concept photos were really interesting and I had hoped they would really create something completely unique and special.


It seems this car now will be very similar to the R but on a few steroids. I think VW have missed a trick, especially with a new more powerful 45AMG pencilled in and a possible RS500. In two years time maybe 400bhp hot hatches will not be such a talking point?


I still believe it will create a storm and be very derisible......though after driving the current R........I'm not sure where that extra 100BHP is going to useful around Leeds.


Old 09 August 2015, 12:39 PM
  #46  
gazzawrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
gazzawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: everywhere
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matteeboy
My M135i is on almost 17k miles; still 4500 miles until its first service! And we get mid 30s to the gallon on a long run. Not bad for a 3.0 six pot turbo (twin scroll) with 320bhp (most are 340 when run in).
Yeah but its still a boring plain looking 1 series that cant be used in any other weather than warm and dry, considering in this country the weathers 90 % wet a bmw has to be the most pointless car to own over here really, if it was to be used in say abu dhabi or some other desert based hot country then yeah its probably awesome but over here, no thanks ill take a 4wd or at least a fwd car over it.

Plus the golf looks 1000 times better than a glorified 1 series and with the cars bmw have produced of late they will no doubt be a lot more reliable too

Last edited by gazzawrx; 09 August 2015 at 12:43 PM.
Old 09 August 2015, 03:25 PM
  #47  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

I have already said countless times if BMW brought the xdrive version with a manual gearbox (M135i Xdrive) over to the UK I would buy it. No doubt about it.

I do miss the AWD when the weather turns for the worse; Even for the simple things like quickly pulling away from busy junctions.
Old 09 August 2015, 04:01 PM
  #48  
lozgti1
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,916
Received 71 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
I have already said countless times if BMW brought the xdrive version with a manual gearbox (M135i Xdrive) over to the UK I would buy it. No doubt about it.

I do miss the AWD when the weather turns for the worse; Even for the simple things like quickly pulling away from busy junctions.
Hate my dsg box in my skoda vrs so much
Old 09 August 2015, 06:03 PM
  #49  
InTurbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
InTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oxford
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jameswrx
Not sure why anyone thinks it's a good idea to change the oil on a high performance car every 20k miles, no matter what the manufacturers say. If I owned one I'd be changing the oil way more often than that.
A work colleague of mine has a z4 35i and its over 2 years old and done 19k and not had its first service yet.
Would love to see the state of the oil in it but it doesn't have a dip stick!

If I had a new car I wouldn't follow there service intervals
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TECHNOPUG
General Technical
11
21 September 2015 05:42 PM
ollyshorey
ScoobyNet General
17
12 August 2001 11:32 PM
TopCat
ScoobyNet General
17
13 March 2001 10:57 PM
salsa-king
Non Scooby Related
7
12 September 2000 01:26 PM
salsa-king
Non Scooby Related
16
10 September 2000 11:10 PM



Quick Reply: VW Golf R400



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:00 AM.