Government - Secret files
#31
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#32
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
#33
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-west-31727699
Mistake my ar$e.. Nothing like brainwashing them while they are young.
Mistake my ar$e.. Nothing like brainwashing them while they are young.
#35
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yup as said above there's nothing like brainwashing while they are young, for a supposedly democratic country we are actually not that different from North Korea at the end of the day, we are actually taught what to think.
#38
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#40
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So according to you science says that climate change is real?
Science also say's the planets temperature changes with natural cycles. So that pretty much blows you're science theory out of the water.
Science also say's the planets temperature changes with natural cycles. So that pretty much blows you're science theory out of the water.
#41
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#44
Scooby Regular
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really don't understand why so many people struggle with this. The issue isn't with whether or not climate change is real, the issue is whether or not it's influenced by mankinds activities.
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's beyond me how anybody could use this argument against the science? He seems to think that the facts of natural variations of the climate have somehow escaped the entire scientific community.
Science is now 95%+ certain that humans are responsible for recent warming. You'd need to have a bloody set of facts to call it a myth.
#47
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But yet the powers that be try to convince us it's actually man made and tax us on it.
But people like Martin roll over like faithful little dogs and take they're reaming from the Government with pleasure.
#48
Scooby Regular
He thinks that man made climate change and natural climate variations are mutually exclusive.
It's beyond me how anybody could use this argument against the science? He seems to think that the facts of natural variations of the climate have somehow escaped the entire scientific community.
Science is now 95%+ certain that humans are responsible for recent warming. You'd need to have a bloody set of facts to call it a myth.
It's beyond me how anybody could use this argument against the science? He seems to think that the facts of natural variations of the climate have somehow escaped the entire scientific community.
Science is now 95%+ certain that humans are responsible for recent warming. You'd need to have a bloody set of facts to call it a myth.
I saw a poster post on another thread - how he hated it when people ask for sources
I assume he was levelling at me
yet, on the WTC, I am asked to believe stuff, yet the evidence presented to support any claim that posters make is always either blatant lies or a massive misrepresentation of the facts
or people who simply think the are the Messiah
and yet I am the one with the closed mind!!!!!
if you need an example of the importance of sources - watch the following news clip - the climate change denier David Bellamy simply out of his depth and conducting scientific fraud with "bent" sourcedata
PLEASE DO NOT WATCH IF YOU HAVE, OR WANT TO MAINTAIN ANY RESPECT FOR DAVID BELLAMY - it is a bit tragic tbh
the science has been basically settled
please can someone put their sources for the "myths" around the science and climate change
thanks
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 07 March 2015 at 06:54 PM.
#49
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly! They know things are changing but they are unsure as to why things are changing, they don't know if the changes are natural or man made.
But yet the powers that be try to convince us it's actually man made and tax us on it.
But people like Martin roll over like faithful little dogs and take they're reaming from the Government with pleasure.
But yet the powers that be try to convince us it's actually man made and tax us on it.
But people like Martin roll over like faithful little dogs and take they're reaming from the Government with pleasure.
#51
Scooby Regular
yes, as I said in the spoiler alert - if you have any respect for him, you would after that shower of ****
pathetic and embarrassing
but all these simple deniers of a "consensus" whether that is climate change, 911 or evolution all use the same tactics
cherry picking data, unreliable and unattributed sources, quote mining (look it up in wiki) and just simple lies
and like creationist and truthers, they simply keep repeating falsehoods and lies
although absolutely happy to accept no science is ever settled, there always room for a better understanding of the world around us, and that the scientist have made errors, in judgement and sometimes exaggeration
pathetic and embarrassing
but all these simple deniers of a "consensus" whether that is climate change, 911 or evolution all use the same tactics
cherry picking data, unreliable and unattributed sources, quote mining (look it up in wiki) and just simple lies
and like creationist and truthers, they simply keep repeating falsehoods and lies
although absolutely happy to accept no science is ever settled, there always room for a better understanding of the world around us, and that the scientist have made errors, in judgement and sometimes exaggeration
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 07 March 2015 at 09:03 PM.
#52
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, as I said in the spoiler alert - if you have any respect for him, you would after that shower of ****
pathetic and embarrassing
but all these simple deniers of a "consensus" whether that is climate change, 911 or evolution all use the same tactics
cherry picking data, unreliable and unattributed sources, quote mining (look it up in wiki) and just simple lies
and like creationist and truthers, they simply keep repeating falsehoods and lies
although absolutely happy to accept no science is ever settled, there always room for a better understanding of the world around us, and that the scientist have made errors, in judgement and sometimes exaggeration
pathetic and embarrassing
but all these simple deniers of a "consensus" whether that is climate change, 911 or evolution all use the same tactics
cherry picking data, unreliable and unattributed sources, quote mining (look it up in wiki) and just simple lies
and like creationist and truthers, they simply keep repeating falsehoods and lies
although absolutely happy to accept no science is ever settled, there always room for a better understanding of the world around us, and that the scientist have made errors, in judgement and sometimes exaggeration
#53
yes, as I said in the spoiler alert - if you have any respect for him, you would after that shower of ****
pathetic and embarrassing
but all these simple deniers of a "consensus" whether that is climate change, 911 or evolution all use the same tactics
cherry picking data, unreliable and unattributed sources, quote mining (look it up in wiki) and just simple lies
and like creationist and truthers, they simply keep repeating falsehoods and lies
although absolutely happy to accept no science is ever settled, there always room for a better understanding of the world around us, and that the scientist have made errors, in judgement and sometimes exaggeration
pathetic and embarrassing
but all these simple deniers of a "consensus" whether that is climate change, 911 or evolution all use the same tactics
cherry picking data, unreliable and unattributed sources, quote mining (look it up in wiki) and just simple lies
and like creationist and truthers, they simply keep repeating falsehoods and lies
although absolutely happy to accept no science is ever settled, there always room for a better understanding of the world around us, and that the scientist have made errors, in judgement and sometimes exaggeration
#54
Scooby Regular
I know quite staggering
and maybe this is the sort scientist James Delingpole (another anti-knowledge truther) is talking about when he says he does not do science, but is an "interpreter of interpretations" wtf does that even mean
and science should be left to bloggers
and maybe this is the sort scientist James Delingpole (another anti-knowledge truther) is talking about when he says he does not do science, but is an "interpreter of interpretations" wtf does that even mean
and science should be left to bloggers
#55
I know quite staggering
and maybe this is the sort scientist James Delingpole (another anti-knowledge truther) is talking about when he says he does not do science, but is an "interpreter of interpretations" wtf does that even mean
James Delingpole doesn't do science - he's "an interpreter of interpretations". - YouTube
and science should be left to bloggers
and maybe this is the sort scientist James Delingpole (another anti-knowledge truther) is talking about when he says he does not do science, but is an "interpreter of interpretations" wtf does that even mean
James Delingpole doesn't do science - he's "an interpreter of interpretations". - YouTube
and science should be left to bloggers
SN has plenty of interpreters of interpretations that go by the baseless interpretations, and that's about it. You should know the meaning of it, Hodgy.
#56
Scooby Regular
Well pretty scary that that should be the scientific process according to Delingpole
A load of youtube amateurs posting boll0x, in the same manner I have highlighted in the WTC thread
Still always a few idiots who believe this stuff, after all (climate deniers, truthers, creationist) belief is unconditional on facts/figures or evidence
A load of youtube amateurs posting boll0x, in the same manner I have highlighted in the WTC thread
Still always a few idiots who believe this stuff, after all (climate deniers, truthers, creationist) belief is unconditional on facts/figures or evidence
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 07 March 2015 at 10:06 PM.
#57
Well pretty scary that that should be the scientific process according to Delingpole
A load of youtube amateurs posting boll0x, in the same manner I have highlighted in the WTC thread
Still always a few idiots who believe this stuff, after all (climate deniers, truthers, creationist) belief is unconditional on facts/figures or evidence
A load of youtube amateurs posting boll0x, in the same manner I have highlighted in the WTC thread
Still always a few idiots who believe this stuff, after all (climate deniers, truthers, creationist) belief is unconditional on facts/figures or evidence
Some people are just antagonists and irrationals. They just love to argue, I suppose.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post