Subway ban Bacon and Ham
Bit touchy aren't you? Where have I said I'm a non consumer of things you've listed? By default I'm just another 'stupid' consumer.
You're also going to great lengths to tell us how you take great care of your animals. Like some latter day Dr. Doolittle. Have you got some idyllic pasture where your animals retire to? Spending their last days comfortably and dying of old age.
Your very profession puts profit before animal welfare so don't call me hypocritical. The food industry is a profit orientated enterprise so don't give it Billy Big Bollocks with your sentimental animal welfare bullsh!t. Pardon the pun.
You're also going to great lengths to tell us how you take great care of your animals. Like some latter day Dr. Doolittle. Have you got some idyllic pasture where your animals retire to? Spending their last days comfortably and dying of old age.
Your very profession puts profit before animal welfare so don't call me hypocritical. The food industry is a profit orientated enterprise so don't give it Billy Big Bollocks with your sentimental animal welfare bullsh!t. Pardon the pun.
O.K I went a bit far and I'm sorry for that I just needed a cig. I would like to add that I have had farmers falling at my feet crying because one of there animals has died. Its not an ideal world but a real one but that doesn't mean that we can't do are best for the animals. I feel very privileged to have worked in some of the finest countryside in the would with these peaceful animals and hate to see them have anything less than what we can provide .
The price of milk is too low. Farmers squeezed to the point of bankruptcy. Bread is literally given away. Get rid off supermarkets, get rid off fast food outlets (including Subway) and bring back local shops and butchers.
Ain't gonna happen though.
Absolutely pathetic.
I wouldn't go near a supermarket when it comes to buying beef, local butchers for me every time the difference is night and day compared to supermarket beef.
But then you'll moan its halal only
Ive posted numerous times on this thread, its up to the franchise holder what is served in the shops and what isnt.
Dont know why people are making a big issue out of it.
Subway as a brand have not enforced anything.

Ive posted numerous times on this thread, its up to the franchise holder what is served in the shops and what isnt.
Dont know why people are making a big issue out of it.
Subway as a brand have not enforced anything.
If subway have to change there ways because of this media trial is it a good thing or not? I am not a big fan of trial by media (Facebook etc) but do like the fact that people seem to have more of a say . Its just a shame that the power is not used for the greater good rather than to just change a menu. I do how ever want this halal meat to be taken off(its animal cruelty) but at the same time want people to have choices. Are we able to make these choices or is this the very reason we have a government ie the public is not capable/to emotional?
Bit confused
Bit confused
What I take from this, is you are pissed off about some shops making a choice about what they sell. In a nutshell.
I can see where you are coming from regarding choice. That's why I asked if it were possible to sell both halal and non-halal. However, these are franchises and the franchisee will make a decision on what to sell or not sell based on what they feel will make them the most money. If they feel that taking certain items off the menu and putting certain ones on will result in the best possible income, that's what they will do. All people have to do is vote with their feet. As Maz said, if the changes result in loss of income, how quickly will things change again? Probably very.
I work in a shop and across the stores, what we stock varies due to demand. There will always be a few that complain that one shop doesn't stock what another one does and they want it, but I always try to explain that the decision is made by the business to sacrifice one thing for another based on demand in the particular shop. There is no point in selling space being taken up by things that very rarely sell, just in case, when that same space can be used for something that does sell. I hope you get what I mean there because I know it's not necessarily worded that well. The same principle could be applied to certain Subways. The difference being, it's not just wasted shelf space. There is a lot more potential for loss where food is concerned. If they buy in food that doesn't sell (or very little) it is just wasted, it can't be shipped out to another store like non-food items can be.
Stores that changed menus will have carefully considered said changes for their own benefit. If that means sacrificing a small amount of customers, for a rise in trade from a bigger group, then that is what they will do.
I hope something there makes some sense
Last edited by Lisawrx; May 3, 2014 at 12:37 AM.
Simple response would be vote with their feet. If people are so against what some stores have done, and in turn Subway as a whole, well hit them where it hurts, in the pocket. Don't ever spend money there again. People who disagree in principal (people that don't go there) can still put their point across without resorting to threats on people.
No, not really. Only you can say what your feelings are about Muslims as a section of society.
What I take from this, is you are pissed off about some shops making a choice about what they sell. In a nutshell.
I can see where you are coming from regarding choice. That's why I asked if it were possible to sell both halal and non-halal. However, these are franchises and the franchisee will make a decision on what to sell or not sell based on what they feel will make them the most money. If they feel that taking certain items off the menu and putting certain ones on will result in the best possible income, that's what they will do. All people have to do is vote with their feet. As Maz said, if the changes result in loss of income, how quickly will things change again? Probably very.
I work in a shop and across the stores, what we stock varies due to demand. There will always be a few that complain that one shop doesn't stock what another one does and they want it, but I always try to explain that the decision is made by the business to sacrifice one thing for another based on demand in the particular shop. There is no point in selling space being taken up by things that very rarely sell, just in case, when that same space can be used for something that does sell. I hope you get what I mean there because I know it's not necessarily worded that well. The same principle could be applied to certain Subways. The difference being, it's not just wasted shelf space. There is a lot more potential for loss where food is concerned. If they buy in food that doesn't sell (or very little) it is just wasted, it can't be shipped out to another store like non-food items can be.
Stores that changed menus will have carefully considered said changes for their own benefit. If that means sacrificing a small amount of customers, for a rise in trade from a bigger group, then that is what they will do.
I hope something there makes some sense
What I take from this, is you are pissed off about some shops making a choice about what they sell. In a nutshell.
I can see where you are coming from regarding choice. That's why I asked if it were possible to sell both halal and non-halal. However, these are franchises and the franchisee will make a decision on what to sell or not sell based on what they feel will make them the most money. If they feel that taking certain items off the menu and putting certain ones on will result in the best possible income, that's what they will do. All people have to do is vote with their feet. As Maz said, if the changes result in loss of income, how quickly will things change again? Probably very.
I work in a shop and across the stores, what we stock varies due to demand. There will always be a few that complain that one shop doesn't stock what another one does and they want it, but I always try to explain that the decision is made by the business to sacrifice one thing for another based on demand in the particular shop. There is no point in selling space being taken up by things that very rarely sell, just in case, when that same space can be used for something that does sell. I hope you get what I mean there because I know it's not necessarily worded that well. The same principle could be applied to certain Subways. The difference being, it's not just wasted shelf space. There is a lot more potential for loss where food is concerned. If they buy in food that doesn't sell (or very little) it is just wasted, it can't be shipped out to another store like non-food items can be.
Stores that changed menus will have carefully considered said changes for their own benefit. If that means sacrificing a small amount of customers, for a rise in trade from a bigger group, then that is what they will do.
I hope something there makes some sense

Lisa you put things very well(much better than I can) and from what I can see you are fair minded,and I do agree with most of what you say.BUT to say it makes good business is just morally wrong.The fact of the matter is that halal meat has VERY strong links to animal cruelty. The Subways involved my only sell meat that has been killed humanely(not to sure about that).But I still believe that just the association to these practises is wrong and in no way should we endorse this behaviour.
Last edited by Carnut; May 3, 2014 at 03:14 AM.
No, not really. Only you can say what your feelings are about Muslims as a section of society. What I take from this, is you are pissed off about some shops making a choice about what they sell. In a nutshell. I can see where you are coming from regarding choice. That's why I asked if it were possible to sell both halal and non-halal. However, these are franchises and the franchisee will make a decision on what to sell or not sell based on what they feel will make them the most money. If they feel that taking certain items off the menu and putting certain ones on will result in the best possible income, that's what they will do. All people have to do is vote with their feet. As Maz said, if the changes result in loss of income, how quickly will things change again? Probably very. I work in a shop and across the stores, what we stock varies due to demand. There will always be a few that complain that one shop doesn't stock what another one does and they want it, but I always try to explain that the decision is made by the business to sacrifice one thing for another based on demand in the particular shop. There is no point in selling space being taken up by things that very rarely sell, just in case, when that same space can be used for something that does sell. I hope you get what I mean there because I know it's not necessarily worded that well. The same principle could be applied to certain Subways. The difference being, it's not just wasted shelf space. There is a lot more potential for loss where food is concerned. If they buy in food that doesn't sell (or very little) it is just wasted, it can't be shipped out to another store like non-food items can be. Stores that changed menus will have carefully considered said changes for their own benefit. If that means sacrificing a small amount of customers, for a rise in trade from a bigger group, then that is what they will do. I hope something there makes some sense 

[QUOTE=chris j t;11419276BUT to say it makes good business is just morally wrong.[/QUOTE]
Morals could be put into question in various good business decisions.
Like I say, for those who think they are doing something wrong, protest by never spending money in a Subway again. It's the best way.
Morals could be put into question in various good business decisions.
Like I say, for those who think they are doing something wrong, protest by never spending money in a Subway again. It's the best way.
To be honest i couldn't give a toss, i think ive only ever used Subway a few times in my life anyway. That's nothing to do with whats on their menu, its to do with the cost.....A fiver for a fricking roll! You get more for your money in a local bakery or sandwich shop.
I could imagine uproar in Saudi Arabia etc if the Christian 5% of the population there make a deal of "15:29" and Halal started to be removed from eateries most frequented by non-Muslims to encourage them to still eat there.
I think colonisation and move away from integration is a dangerous thing. I'd like to see the Government intervene tbh. I know the underlying intention of Subway maybe a commercial one but it's all adding to the threat of no go areas and temptation of creating/wanting Sharia zones.
Lol subway stop selling bacon and now we're going to have sharia law.
All this fuss about nothing. I doubt many muslims use subway anyway regardless of halal meat or bacon.
All this fuss about nothing. I doubt many muslims use subway anyway regardless of halal meat or bacon.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 17,864
Likes: 0
From: Not all those who wander are lost
Let the franchise owners decide what they do and don't want to sell IMO. They know what their customers want and know whether their profits will be affected.
Personally I wouldn't eat in Subway and don't eat meat so I don't give a crap what they do
Personally I wouldn't eat in Subway and don't eat meat so I don't give a crap what they do
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
You are all aware that schools are feeding your kids Halal meat to cut complication ?
To avoid the pain of separation of meats, they just pay up for the easy option.
The only Subway "owner" I know is a Muslim and doesn't serve ham or bacon in his store.
Mind you he smokes, drinks has a wife and kids somewhere Darn 'Sarf... and runs a local blonde hottie up here where he works....
dunx
P.S. I'll raise my pitchfork when supermarkets stop stocking bacon !
To avoid the pain of separation of meats, they just pay up for the easy option.
The only Subway "owner" I know is a Muslim and doesn't serve ham or bacon in his store.
Mind you he smokes, drinks has a wife and kids somewhere Darn 'Sarf... and runs a local blonde hottie up here where he works....
dunx
P.S. I'll raise my pitchfork when supermarkets stop stocking bacon !
Last edited by dunx; May 3, 2014 at 11:08 AM.
maybe its because you don't eat meat(are you a vegi?) you say its o.k for them to sell what they want but do you not have concerns about animal cruelty?.Would it be o.k for them to sell burgers made from un wanted puppys?,if it made a good profit,hence ignorance is bliss.
Last edited by Carnut; May 3, 2014 at 01:28 PM.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 17,864
Likes: 0
From: Not all those who wander are lost
maybe its because you don't eat meat(are you a vegi?) you say its o.k for them to sell what they want but do you not have concerns about animal cruelty?.Would it be o.k for them to sell burgers made from un wanted puppys?,if it made a good profit,hence ignorance is bliss.
You're missing the point of the discussion, which is whether Subway franchisees can choose not to sell certain meats. That's up to them. The discussion isn't about whether Subway should sell any animal products is it?
Ignorance is not bliss, informing yourself and respecting the views of others, however, is.







