Notices

Lower Isn't Always Better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 July 2011, 10:32 PM
  #1  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lower Isn't Always Better

Been running on some BC coilovers on 18" rims for about 3 months now; when they were originally set up the car sat very low, looked good but the ride was too hard and the handling was unpredictable at times... 'bone shaker low' in fact. The front end dipped slightly with a bit of positive rake so I decided I'd had enough.

I've spent the last 2 weeks trying out different ride height and damper settings and levelled off the rake. Today I've finally done it, and ironically the car now sits more or less where it did with my Prodrive springs on. However the 30 point adjustable damping allowed me to set the ride up to provide excellent grip whilst maintaining a firm but comfortable ride, better than the Prodrives.

Visually the car now reminds me where the love affair with these babies began.

Lessons learned... Imprezas aren't meant to be in the weeds.
Old 20 July 2011, 10:55 PM
  #3  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Only finished it this evening but I'll get some before and after pics on for the weekend mate. Nice looking motor though mate.
Old 21 July 2011, 07:59 AM
  #4  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Geometry ?
Old 21 July 2011, 08:41 AM
  #5  
TinyTim
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TinyTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If that's how it was in your avatar it doesnt look particularly low. As Dunx said, the Geo was probably well out.
Old 21 July 2011, 10:47 AM
  #6  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TinyTim
If that's how it was in your avatar it doesnt look particularly low. As Dunx said, the Geo was probably well out.
Had the full geometry done, had camber bolts fitted to the rear so that I could have the Prodrive settings applied when it was 1st done.

Maybe it's an age thing? I used to moan about Clarkson always complaining about suspension being too hard but I would have agreed with him on this one. Felt like my @rse was scraping on the floor. Tried adjusting the dampers but couldn't get it right.

Now it's nice and firm but doesn't break my back.

It's weird though... adjusting the height with BCs only adjusts the leg length without touching the spring length or tension so I don't quite get why it makes so much of a difference??
Old 21 July 2011, 11:58 AM
  #7  
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Havering, Essex
Posts: 6,252
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Scoober-Dubs
It's weird though... adjusting the height with BCs only adjusts the leg length without touching the spring length or tension so I don't quite get why it makes so much of a difference??
Yes, irrespective of ride height, the stiffness would remain the same. Maybe it's a 'placebo' effect?
I have Apex (BC with different colour collars) and am thinking of raising the height a little closer to the original Prodrive setting. Have you an actual meaurement to quote? eg wheelarch to wheel rim, wheelarch to wheel centre etc. What damper stiffness did you settle on - clicks from full soft.

JohnD
Old 21 July 2011, 12:10 PM
  #8  
Cocker
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Cocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have the BCs set to almost standard ride height and have no complaints regarding handling. Stick a front splitter on to make it seem lower than what it actually is!
Old 21 July 2011, 12:13 PM
  #9  
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
bonesetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 3,491
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Impreza's just don't like to be lowered.

It causes all kinds of problems. Your unpredictable characteristic could well have been bump steer. I bought a new age scooby a while back which had been excessively lowered and show it a road with undulations at it was all over the place.

Other big thing is reduced damper travel and riding into the bump stops

The Type R I recently bought had green Tein s.tech lowering springs which put the car almost permanently on the bump stops. Any kind of spirited driving was just horrible

I have changed to P1 struts and springs. The Prodrive springs do in fact lower the car, but not by much. The set-up does a very good job
Old 21 July 2011, 12:20 PM
  #10  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
Yes, irrespective of ride height, the stiffness would remain the same. Maybe it's a 'placebo' effect?
I have Apex (BC with different colour collars) and am thinking of raising the height a little closer to the original Prodrive setting. Have you an actual meaurement to quote? eg wheelarch to wheel rim, wheelarch to wheel centre etc. What damper stiffness did you settle on - clicks from full soft.

JohnD
I think it's a case of getting the right balance... when the car was lower I lost some grip because I'd virtually taken out all the body roll thus creating a bit of slide when cornering. Now I get a slight bit of roll but the grip is increased.

In terms of measurements if you're measuring the length of the threaded shaft between the collar at the bottom of the shaft to the small locking collar at the spring end, I have set them up as follows:

Ride Height
Fronts 90 mm
Rears 158 mm

Dampers
Fronts: 17
Rears: 16

Tyre pressures
Fronts: 33 PSI
Rears: 32 PSI

I'm actually undecided about the rear damper settings, can't decide between 16, or 17...
Old 21 July 2011, 12:22 PM
  #11  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bonesetter
Impreza's just don't like to be lowered.

It causes all kinds of problems. Your unpredictable characteristic could well have been bump steer. I bought a new age scooby a while back which had been excessively lowered and show it a road with undulations at it was all over the place.

Other big thing is reduced damper travel and riding into the bump stops

The Type R I recently bought had green Tein s.tech lowering springs which put the car almost permanently on the bump stops. Any kind of spirited driving was just horrible

I have changed to P1 struts and springs. The Prodrive springs do in fact lower the car, but not by much. The set-up does a very good job
Defo agree with you mate
Old 21 July 2011, 12:26 PM
  #12  
stef_2010
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
stef_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had this aswell

Asked the mechanic that fitted my BCs to have it low, but not stupid low. Well he put it to low anyway !

Before





This is the best pic I have of it raised



Made the world of difference imo
Old 21 July 2011, 12:38 PM
  #13  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stef_2010
I had this aswell

Asked the mechanic that fitted my BCs to have it low, but not stupid low. Well he put it to low anyway !

Before





This is the best pic I have of it raised



Made the world of difference imo
Looks much better at the sensible height; it makes sense... they were conceived as rally cars, and not touring cars.
Old 21 July 2011, 12:54 PM
  #14  
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
CREWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdare / Daventry
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It looks so much better at the proper height.
Old 21 July 2011, 02:10 PM
  #15  
suBruce
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
suBruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stoke
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thread makes for interesting but predictable reading. Subaru R&d will have spent lots the way it is. So best not lower mine then, but do you think putting P1 shock and springs on will improve the handling and looks on a sport? will it be slightly lower, thats what I'm after.
Old 21 July 2011, 02:22 PM
  #16  
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
CREWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdare / Daventry
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by suBruce
Thread makes for interesting but predictable reading. Subaru R&d will have spent lots the way it is. So best not lower mine then, but do you think putting P1 shock and springs on will improve the handling and looks on a sport? will it be slightly lower, thats what I'm after.
Yes, yes and yes.

It'll handle a lot better and it will be lowered by around an inch (25.4mm).

Also if you want handling mods you should get a rear anti roll bar.
Old 21 July 2011, 02:25 PM
  #17  
stef_2010
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
stef_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I only had standard STI suspension on mine before upgrading but if you can stretch to it the BCs are very good imo

With these fitted and an aggressive geo setting the difference really is almost unbelievable

Bye bye understeer
Old 21 July 2011, 02:28 PM
  #18  
stef_2010
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
stef_2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I could go on for ages about it

The car feels incredibly stable going through fast sweeping bends, just inspires confidence

I love my car
Old 21 July 2011, 02:35 PM
  #19  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stef_2010
I could go on for ages about it

The car feels incredibly stable going through fast sweeping bends, just inspires confidence

I love my car
I agree, BCs are a bloody good mod, the beauty is that you can tweak them to get them just how you want. You get 'a lotta bang 4 ya buck!'
Old 21 July 2011, 02:35 PM
  #20  
eggy790
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
eggy790's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my car is on bc's and as low as my bugeye will go without scraping / rubbing on hard bends/full lock etc. full geometry done and braces and arbs etc. and cant fault the handling one bit.. spot on and deos exactly what i want.

only hit the bump stops once when hammering it down a road and then noticed the surface change and drop due to the road being redone, was as if i was airbourne for a while lol
Old 21 July 2011, 09:56 PM
  #21  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scoober-Dubs
I think it's a case of getting the right balance... when the car was lower I lost some grip because I'd virtually taken out all the body roll thus creating a bit of slide when cornering. Now I get a slight bit of roll but the grip is increased.

In terms of measurements if you're measuring the length of the threaded shaft between the collar at the bottom of the shaft to the small locking collar at the spring end, I have set them up as follows:

Ride Height
Fronts 90 mm
Rears 158 mm

Dampers
Fronts: 17
Rears: 16

Tyre pressures
Fronts: 33 PSI
Rears: 32 PSI

I'm actually undecided about the rear damper settings, can't decide between 16, or 17...
Just discovered that these damper settings are too stiff for the wet

Going to have to find a happy medium that works well on both the wet and the dry
Old 21 July 2011, 10:47 PM
  #22  
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Havering, Essex
Posts: 6,252
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

At the moment I have 12 front, 8 rear - clicks from full soft.
Are your spring rates 6/5?

JohnD

Last edited by JohnD; 21 July 2011 at 10:48 PM.
Old 22 July 2011, 07:40 AM
  #23  
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
bonesetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 3,491
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Connor_scotland
I am having the same issue pal car looks awesome but doesnt handle to well



Any pics of the new height?
Yours does look very low indeed. Here's a pic of mine which was giving all manner of problems



And here's the handling development thread which may be of some help
Old 22 July 2011, 07:58 AM
  #24  
-shane-
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
 
-shane-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bonesetter
Yours does look very low indeed. Here's a pic of mine which was giving all manner of problems



And here's the handling development thread which may be of some help
Mine sits like this what problems have you experienced

I want to raise mine a bit but won't it mess up my geo settings
Old 22 July 2011, 08:05 AM
  #25  
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
bonesetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 3,491
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -shane-
Mine sits like this what problems have you experienced

I want to raise mine a bit but won't it mess up my geo settings
It's all in the development thread bud.

If you change the height, the geo will need resetting
Old 22 July 2011, 01:31 PM
  #26  
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Havering, Essex
Posts: 6,252
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTEI want to raise mine a bit but won't it mess up my geo settings[/QUOTE]

I did a quick calculation as to the difference raising the ride height would have on the camber. Lengthening the strut to raise the car will reduce the amount of negative camber. Using simple trigonometry (back to school!) a nominal strut length of say 550mm raised to 556mm (6mm ride height increase) would reduce a 1.5deg neg. camber to 1.48deg a change of 1.2 min of arc. Can the alignment machines (or the operator) handle that level of tolerance? Flexing of the system could well exceed that, surely!
It's probably not as simplistic as that, but the changes are miniscule!

JohnD

Last edited by JohnD; 22 July 2011 at 01:39 PM.
Old 22 July 2011, 04:59 PM
  #27  
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
dunx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Camber isn't the only variable, there are the steering geometry and roll centre changes to consider...
Toe-in/out is guaranteed to vary with ride height ( bump steer may be increased or if lucky decreased ), whilst I agree there is little you can do directly to control the roll centre variation.

IMHO.

dunx
Old 22 July 2011, 06:52 PM
  #28  
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
bonesetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Midlands
Posts: 3,491
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Lifting my new age by 20mm made a big difference all around, but especially to the camber angles
Old 23 July 2011, 09:25 AM
  #29  
Scoober-Dubs
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Scoober-Dubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnD
At the moment I have 12 front, 8 rear - clicks from full soft.
Are your spring rates 6/5?

JohnD
Not sure what the spring rates are... I've left them as they were when fitted at Scooby Clinic. How would I find this out?
Old 23 July 2011, 11:05 AM
  #30  
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Havering, Essex
Posts: 6,252
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Scoober-Dubs
Not sure what the spring rates are... I've left them as they were when fitted at Scooby Clinic. How would I find this out?
There are numbers on the springs that relate to the free (uncompressed) length and the rate (Kg per mm compression)

JohnD


Quick Reply: Lower Isn't Always Better



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 AM.