Notices

Oversteer after new geometry settings and new SO-3's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2001 | 06:03 PM
  #1  
dmel's Avatar
dmel
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Post

Yesterday I changed my worn-out SO-2's for brand new S0-3's (205x50/16). I also changed my suspension settings because I hadn't checked them for a while. As it turned out the settings were all over the place... I changed them to:

Front: Camber = -1.25 degrees
Toe = 0 mm
Rear: Camber = -1.25 degrees
Toe = 0.5 mm inwards in each wheel (1 mm in total)

I decided to go for more negative camber because the inside region of the old tyres were in near perfect condition (relatively). Furtermore when cornering hard and the front tyres were pushed hard, the outside sidewalls had signs of coning in contact with the tarmac even reaching the "Bridgestone" mark implying that the camber was not negative enough (indeed it was -0,75 degrees).

After the new settings the car seems to oversteer quite a lot. It tends to lift-off oversteer quite easily and at much lower speeds than before. It is generally easy to make the tail-snap out. On the other hand understeer has been reduced considerably and turn-in is sharper.

I am aware that the tyres are new and that they haven't bed-in properly yet (only 200 miles). On the other hand considering that all 4 tyres are in the same condition there shouldn't be in any bias towards understeer or oversteer; just lower limit of adhesion. Therefore since there is no understeer the reason for oversteer should be the new settings and not the tyres.

The questions are:
1. Do I have too much camber in the back-end? This could explain lift-off oversteer. When lifting off the back end is "lighter" and "only" the inside region of the tyre is in contact with the tarmac thus making it prone to oversteer.

2. Is it OK to have a bit of toe-in in the back? Shouldn't in theory provide some stability?

3. Tyre pressures. A new topic on its own. Following the advice of another thread I inflated the tyres slightly higher than S0-2's. I have 35 in front, 33 in the back.

Looking forward to your replies. Dimitris MY99.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2001 | 07:28 PM
  #2  
johnfelstead's Avatar
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,440
Likes: 54
Post

camber seems excesive all round.

I would sugest your front tyre wear patern was down to low presures, not lack of camber. You will also get that if your using more lock than needed. Next time you feel it understeering (please play with this idea in a safe place first!) try reducing the lock a little rather than piling it on, you may find it actually turns in better because you are already over the limit of the tyre and are just making things worse.

toe in at the rear does induce stability in a straight line.

The SO3's are pants compaired to the SO2's when it comes to grip levels. S de B can tell you far more on this than myself.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2001 | 08:01 PM
  #3  
dmel's Avatar
dmel
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Post

This exactly my response to understeering. I agree with you on that.

Having read other threads the camber settings are not excessive. Also the FAQ states that the Prodrive settings for front camber are Max. Equal Negative. -1.25 is not even the maximum.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2001 | 07:08 PM
  #4  
AJbaseBloke's Avatar
AJbaseBloke
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Post

Try some different tyre pressures m8. Maybe even higher.

And believe it or not, you may not be through the crummy top layer yet me thinks - it took me around 1200kms before finding the sweet stuff. Now very with them (215/45-17 at 36psi/f, 34psi/r - going to 40psi/f, 38psi/r when going for "exercise").

Cheers.

Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 11:05 AM
  #5  
Jza's Avatar
Jza
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 0
Post

Just one thing. One day doesnt seem a lot of "bedding in" for the tyres!! Are you sure the problem isnt that they've still got bed in?

Jza
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2001 | 02:05 PM
  #6  
Stelios's Avatar
Stelios
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Post

What suspension have you got Dimitri and where did u get your car measured?
If you can adjust rear camber try reducing it first at the range -0.75 to -1.00.
Im booked for geometry check on Wednesday after fitting the whiteline kit including ARBs and rear camber bolts.
|Ill go for front -1.00, 0.00 toe, rear -0.75, 1mm 0ut per side.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2001 | 06:44 AM
  #7  
dmel's Avatar
dmel
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Wink

Jza, you don't know how many miles one can do in a couple of days

Stelio, I went to 'Rabbit' in Peristeri. He is very well known and "Omada Sigma" goes there too. My suspension is standard although I think it's time for an upgrade...
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 24, 2001 | 03:32 PM
  #8  
dmel's Avatar
dmel
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Post

I think the answer is rear toe. I have reduced rear toe to zero and the car oversteers even more. Before making any changes rear toe-in was 4mm (2mm in each wheel) and the car snaped its tail with extreme difficulty.
I will now set it to 2mm total. All this with standard suspension. Nevertheless, I think it's time for a suspension upgrade.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
2
Oct 2, 2015 05:34 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 PM.