Looking to buy a Subaru and need advice....
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Somerset
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking to buy a Subaru and need advice....
Hi there,
First post to excuse any breaches of ettiquette...
To give some background -
I drive around 20-25k per annum. I currently have a Merc CLK 270CDi which I like (except it's diesel) and this car is used most of the time for road use.
I also have a ML which I use for towing - and where a big boot etc is useful.
That's the theory. In practice this last year I have had to take the ML far more than the CLK because of snow / flooding (we live on the Somerset levels which flood a bit) plus for work I attend trade shows which are in fields. These were quagmires so the ML was essential.
But a 3 tonne 5.0V8 ML is not a good car to drive 25k miles per annum in.....
I am looking to sell the CLK - I should get around £6k for it - and replace it with a Subaru estate which will do most of what the ML does, but cheaper and a nicer drive on the road.
Here is the question - What one...?
I have looked at a Legacy and a Forrester. The Legacy seems a better bet to me as it seems more comfy and probably a better bet for a big mileage.
So what engine should I get? I want an auto and I don't want diesel. I was also considering an Outback but haven't been able to see one yet. I want to keep it pre-march 2006 to keep the road tax down.
So - given that, and I want a nice spec and decent performance, I was looking at the 2.5 or the 3.0 engines.
Obviously I would welcome any other suggestions as well but interested to see what the views are.
Aside:- I have also seen on here messages about 2.5's "blowing up" !!!! Are Subaru's reliable or should I expect trouble with them - I would be very unlikely to modify it.
Thanks in advance.
First post to excuse any breaches of ettiquette...
To give some background -
I drive around 20-25k per annum. I currently have a Merc CLK 270CDi which I like (except it's diesel) and this car is used most of the time for road use.
I also have a ML which I use for towing - and where a big boot etc is useful.
That's the theory. In practice this last year I have had to take the ML far more than the CLK because of snow / flooding (we live on the Somerset levels which flood a bit) plus for work I attend trade shows which are in fields. These were quagmires so the ML was essential.
But a 3 tonne 5.0V8 ML is not a good car to drive 25k miles per annum in.....
I am looking to sell the CLK - I should get around £6k for it - and replace it with a Subaru estate which will do most of what the ML does, but cheaper and a nicer drive on the road.
Here is the question - What one...?
I have looked at a Legacy and a Forrester. The Legacy seems a better bet to me as it seems more comfy and probably a better bet for a big mileage.
So what engine should I get? I want an auto and I don't want diesel. I was also considering an Outback but haven't been able to see one yet. I want to keep it pre-march 2006 to keep the road tax down.
So - given that, and I want a nice spec and decent performance, I was looking at the 2.5 or the 3.0 engines.
Obviously I would welcome any other suggestions as well but interested to see what the views are.
Aside:- I have also seen on here messages about 2.5's "blowing up" !!!! Are Subaru's reliable or should I expect trouble with them - I would be very unlikely to modify it.
Thanks in advance.
#3
Scooby Regular
If you have a £6k budget you could get yourself (probably with change to spare) a very nice Legacy Spec B with a 3.0 engine though you may have to wait for a pre March '06 one to come up.
You could also consider the rapid Forester XT or for a bit more a Forester STi - they're very quick.
If you really want to stretch and it has to be an estate, try searching for a Legacy STi on Pistonheads, there's one going and that's a really bonkers motor.
#4
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Somerset
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the replies.
It HAS to be automatic (think that rules out most sti's)
I also hate diesel - I intend to LPG the car (seen lots of Subaru's with LPG so I know it works OK)
I was thinking 3.0 BSpec also.
Are the Outbacks just soggy Legacy estates or are they still nice to drive?
Thanks
It HAS to be automatic (think that rules out most sti's)
I also hate diesel - I intend to LPG the car (seen lots of Subaru's with LPG so I know it works OK)
I was thinking 3.0 BSpec also.
Are the Outbacks just soggy Legacy estates or are they still nice to drive?
Thanks
#5
Scooby Regular
Thanks for the replies.
It HAS to be automatic (think that rules out most sti's)
I also hate diesel - I intend to LPG the car (seen lots of Subaru's with LPG so I know it works OK)
I was thinking 3.0 BSpec also.
Are the Outbacks just soggy Legacy estates or are they still nice to drive?
Thanks
It HAS to be automatic (think that rules out most sti's)
I also hate diesel - I intend to LPG the car (seen lots of Subaru's with LPG so I know it works OK)
I was thinking 3.0 BSpec also.
Are the Outbacks just soggy Legacy estates or are they still nice to drive?
Thanks
The 3.0 Spec B does come as an auto, it's not quite as quick you're looking at a 0-60 time around 8 seconds whereas the manual will do it in 6.5ish. Don't expect more than 28-30mpg.
The outback is a bit soggier but unless you plan on giving it a blast down some back roads you're not going to notice too much.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sub-Subaru
General Technical
1
28 September 2015 12:47 PM