When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Out of interest - who rev's their cars past 6k regularly
Just out of interest, I was thinking how safe it is to rev to about 6k continually when having a blast. I always cringe when I'm using the full rev range of my 2006 slightly remapped hawkeye thinking I'll blow it up if I continue.
Just interested if anybody else feel overly-mechanically sympathetic...and any experiences of driving style to make me feel better (or worse !)
My scoobs is running a vf22 and its only in the mid range of boost at 6k so its often up well past 6k when driven in anger which is about 15 mins after and before its started and stopped lol
Very rarely here but that's as my uk classic is mapped on the TD04 so it's a big gutless at 6,000rpm. On a positive note though 1.45 bar boost at 3,000 rpm
Now and again, dont really get much opportunity to give mine the beans. My car makes its power and torque very low down so it can be driven quickly without having to rev.
I make max torque at 3750rpm and it starts to drop off at 4500rpm and max bhp at 4500rpm and drops off at 6400rpm according to delta dash.
It always makes me chuckle when I look at the revs cars do. My old 1991 CBR600 (motorbike, in case that's confused you) happily went to 13500 rpm and I had no qualms at all about doing it. The later Yamaha R6s went to 15500!
As to the car though, 6000 rpm is going quite quickly enough for most situations.
It always makes me chuckle when I look at the revs cars do. My old 1991 CBR600 (motorbike, in case that's confused you) happily went to 13500 rpm and I had no qualms at all about doing it. The later Yamaha R6s went to 15500!
As to the car though, 6000 rpm is going quite quickly enough for most situations.
Yes but a CBR600 is only 150cc per cylinder so has tiny light pistons. You have to remember a piston has to come to a dead stop then accelerate twice in its 360* cycle so piston mass is a huge factor. You bike may rev but look how little bhp and torque it produces per rev.
Indeed. It makes you wonder how the Honda SP1 & 2 rev to 10000 and stay in one piece. I was going to include Ducatis, but they sometimes don't!
I think they get the higher rev ceiling by not over squaring the engine as much ie longer stroke to reduce the piston mass. Also bike crank webs are a lot lighter than cars so less rotational mass as-well.
Yup about Ducati's
I think they get the higher rev ceiling by not over squaring the engine as much ie longer stroke to reduce the piston mass. Also bike crank webs are a lot lighter than cars so less rotational mass as-well.
Yup about Ducati's
The limiting factor is average piston speed, by having an oversquare engine where the bore is larger in relation to the stroke the piston has to travel a shorter distance for a given RPM than an engine with a longer stroke. So oversquare engines are more rev-friendly.
The limiting factor is average piston speed, by having an oversquare engine where the bore is larger in relation to the stroke the piston has to travel a shorter distance for a given RPM than an engine with a longer stroke. So oversquare engines are more rev-friendly.
Yes but the piston has to then reach its speed in a shorter distance before coming to a dead stop at TDC, then again a BDC. Your correct in a over square engine has a higher rev ceiling than a long stroke but an over square engine also generally has a higher piston mass to move.
With the point being made about V2 bike engine compared to I4 Bike engines, the I4 is more over square than the V2. both have issues in that the v2 is longer stroke to reduce piston mass reducing revs but increasing torque . The I4 is over square which can rev higher due to piston mass being reduced because displacement is spread over more cylinders.
This is getting off the original point somewhat, which was why the bike engine revs higher than the cars. The reason i gave was piston mass and heavier crank webs.