Which fsh hawkeye should I buy: high mile spec d (70k) or low mile wrx sl (40k)
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which fsh hawkeye should I buy: high mile spec d (70k) or low mile wrx sl (40k)
Hi there,
My story is: I owned an Elise for 6 years, the wife and I had a baby, bought an e60 525i sport, now after 6 months I've realised I actually want something a bit more sporting.
We test drove a 19k mile 56 plate WRX SL, and loved it to bits, but the brakes lacked feel, and the steering was very light. Still, it was great fun, and is probably the perfect balance of speed, agility, practicality and refinement for us. My wife liked it too, we both got out after the test drive grinning with fear
We only want to go for a discreet looking Hawkeye with black leather, so this limits us to an SL or a Spec D.
Our budget is £6-9k - the BMW's value give or take. This gets us (looking at auto trader and PH) a 1 owner FSSH WRX advertised at £8k with 40k, or a 1 owner FSSH spec D advertised at £9k with 70k.
From everything I read the Spec D (sti) is a better car than the wrx. However, we still loved the wrx we drove (the only Subaru we've ever driven) and I question whether at the 70k ish miles the spec D may need new suspension and given the more highly tuned engine I'm not sure how much life is left in it before a rebuild is required - which would essentially mean we can't afford it.
Are my concerns valid?
When do the 300bhp-ish sti engines become at risk of rebuild?
When is the suspension past its best?
Am I right to think clutches rarely last beyond 40/50/60k?
Oh and is the braking & steering feel more detailed on the spec D than wrx?
I'd appreciate your advice!
Pete
My story is: I owned an Elise for 6 years, the wife and I had a baby, bought an e60 525i sport, now after 6 months I've realised I actually want something a bit more sporting.
We test drove a 19k mile 56 plate WRX SL, and loved it to bits, but the brakes lacked feel, and the steering was very light. Still, it was great fun, and is probably the perfect balance of speed, agility, practicality and refinement for us. My wife liked it too, we both got out after the test drive grinning with fear
We only want to go for a discreet looking Hawkeye with black leather, so this limits us to an SL or a Spec D.
Our budget is £6-9k - the BMW's value give or take. This gets us (looking at auto trader and PH) a 1 owner FSSH WRX advertised at £8k with 40k, or a 1 owner FSSH spec D advertised at £9k with 70k.
From everything I read the Spec D (sti) is a better car than the wrx. However, we still loved the wrx we drove (the only Subaru we've ever driven) and I question whether at the 70k ish miles the spec D may need new suspension and given the more highly tuned engine I'm not sure how much life is left in it before a rebuild is required - which would essentially mean we can't afford it.
Are my concerns valid?
When do the 300bhp-ish sti engines become at risk of rebuild?
When is the suspension past its best?
Am I right to think clutches rarely last beyond 40/50/60k?
Oh and is the braking & steering feel more detailed on the spec D than wrx?
I'd appreciate your advice!
Pete
Last edited by ex-lotus; 06 February 2011 at 06:29 PM. Reason: a load of typos
#4
That's a choice worth pondering, human nature is such that a number of WRX owners will possibly suggest the low miles WRX whereas it's likely STI owners will steer you in the direction of the spec D. It's possible that the steering and braking issues are down to tire inflation and the pads currently in use. I have a WRX and when I had to drive my old chap's Rover 45 I nearly put myself through the windscreen when braking, and found my Scoobie's pedal to feel a little heavy when getting back in my own car. However when under real load my Hawk brakes are noticeably better and aside from the Rover's eagerness to stand on its nose at low speeds I'd rather have the stopping power of my car any day of the week. The brakes are deceptively good.
I suggest you test drive both cars and then throw every consideration into the mix and make your choice based around your own preferences, as some would be drawn towards the low mileage while others will prefer the spec D for the specification.
By the way, I own an 06 Hawk with a few tweaks and find it hard to drive it in a manner where I'd be hindered by it's performance which has been achieved without having to re mortgage.
all the best with your purchase
Tim
I suggest you test drive both cars and then throw every consideration into the mix and make your choice based around your own preferences, as some would be drawn towards the low mileage while others will prefer the spec D for the specification.
By the way, I own an 06 Hawk with a few tweaks and find it hard to drive it in a manner where I'd be hindered by it's performance which has been achieved without having to re mortgage.
all the best with your purchase
Tim
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
If cambelt changes are due on the 2.5 engine at the same intervals as the 2.0, then you will be looking at a cambelt change in 10k on the wrx, and as long as the spec d has had its first already done, then 30k on that. This costs around £500, depending on the state of the pulleys and tensioner.
Engines shouldn't need a rebuild for a long time if they have been looked after properly.
You can change pads and get slightly better feel with the brakes, steering shouldn't feel that light, check tyre pressures.
Personally I'd go for the spec d, my wrx always makes me smile but you do get used to them quickly.
Test drive both and get the one you prefer.
Engines shouldn't need a rebuild for a long time if they have been looked after properly.
You can change pads and get slightly better feel with the brakes, steering shouldn't feel that light, check tyre pressures.
Personally I'd go for the spec d, my wrx always makes me smile but you do get used to them quickly.
Test drive both and get the one you prefer.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
Spec D, no real contest tbh I love a WRX but given the choice STi all day long
One plus side to the WRX SL is that the leather seats are heated and in the SpecD they aren't. This wouldn't change my mind though as I hate sunroofs
My SpecD..
https://www.scoobynet.com/album.php?albumid=47
One plus side to the WRX SL is that the leather seats are heated and in the SpecD they aren't. This wouldn't change my mind though as I hate sunroofs
My SpecD..
https://www.scoobynet.com/album.php?albumid=47
#11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (54)
well i have a hawkey wrx sl,
im running 355bhp and no problems,
i wanted something diff and im glad i went with this,
yes the brakes are a bit spongy but its not hard to fix them either get braided brake lines,with some mintex1144 or bluestuff pads, these changed my brakes massively,or get a set of brembos,
i changed my f@r arbs droplinks to whiteline ones with alk and droplinks, car feels like its on rails, very comfy and handles superbly,
my mate loves his spec d and they are great cars as well,it all comes down to personal choice but,leather,heated seats and sunroof swung it for me,
hope this helps
cheers tom
im running 355bhp and no problems,
i wanted something diff and im glad i went with this,
yes the brakes are a bit spongy but its not hard to fix them either get braided brake lines,with some mintex1144 or bluestuff pads, these changed my brakes massively,or get a set of brembos,
i changed my f@r arbs droplinks to whiteline ones with alk and droplinks, car feels like its on rails, very comfy and handles superbly,
my mate loves his spec d and they are great cars as well,it all comes down to personal choice but,leather,heated seats and sunroof swung it for me,
hope this helps
cheers tom
#13
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: W. Sussex
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's a choice worth pondering, human nature is such that a number of WRX owners will possibly suggest the low miles WRX whereas it's likely STI owners will steer you in the direction of the spec D. It's possible that the steering and braking issues are down to tire inflation and the pads currently in use. I have a WRX and when I had to drive my old chap's Rover 45 I nearly put myself through the windscreen when braking, and found my Scoobie's pedal to feel a little heavy when getting back in my own car. However when under real load my Hawk brakes are noticeably better and aside from the Rover's eagerness to stand on its nose at low speeds I'd rather have the stopping power of my car any day of the week. The brakes are deceptively good.
I suggest you test drive both cars and then throw every consideration into the mix and make your choice based around your own preferences, as some would be drawn towards the low mileage while others will prefer the spec D for the specification.
By the way, I own an 06 Hawk with a few tweaks and find it hard to drive it in a manner where I'd be hindered by it's performance which has been achieved without having to re mortgage.
all the best with your purchase
Tim
I suggest you test drive both cars and then throw every consideration into the mix and make your choice based around your own preferences, as some would be drawn towards the low mileage while others will prefer the spec D for the specification.
By the way, I own an 06 Hawk with a few tweaks and find it hard to drive it in a manner where I'd be hindered by it's performance which has been achieved without having to re mortgage.
all the best with your purchase
Tim
Ooh er, I've read that 08+ (hatchback) 2.5s were susceptible to engine failure, didn't realise it was all 2.5s?
well i have a hawkey wrx sl,
im running 355bhp and no problems,
i wanted something diff and im glad i went with this,
yes the brakes are a bit spongy but its not hard to fix them either get braided brake lines,with some mintex1144 or bluestuff pads, these changed my brakes massively,or get a set of brembos,
i changed my f@r arbs droplinks to whiteline ones with alk and droplinks, car feels like its on rails, very comfy and handles superbly,
my mate loves his spec d and they are great cars as well,it all comes down to personal choice but,leather,heated seats and sunroof swung it for me,
hope this helps
cheers tom
im running 355bhp and no problems,
i wanted something diff and im glad i went with this,
yes the brakes are a bit spongy but its not hard to fix them either get braided brake lines,with some mintex1144 or bluestuff pads, these changed my brakes massively,or get a set of brembos,
i changed my f@r arbs droplinks to whiteline ones with alk and droplinks, car feels like its on rails, very comfy and handles superbly,
my mate loves his spec d and they are great cars as well,it all comes down to personal choice but,leather,heated seats and sunroof swung it for me,
hope this helps
cheers tom
how much did the arb and droplinks cost parts / labour? any reason you didn't get springs / dampers?
overall I tend to think that the spec d will almost certainly be past its best handling wise - i can remember how tight my Elise felt at 30k compared to 40k miles later.... I need to go and drive one see how it compares to a slower, fresher wrx.
btw way love the spec in the classifieds, if the owner would swap for my 525i SE sport (should be an easy sale at 8) plus a grand it'd be a deal done. but I think he is looking for more than that.
Cheers
Pete
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 07:18 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM