Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Holy mary check these out...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 February 2001, 08:10 PM
  #1  
Blow Dog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Blow Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: London
Posts: 3,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

If you have a phat connection, go here:
Old 05 February 2001, 08:15 PM
  #2  
Andy W
Scooby Regular
 
Andy W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Blow dog is that your Evo in this months Evo?
The MY01 does a p!$$ poor job lower rating than the celica and clio 172!
Andy W
Old 05 February 2001, 09:27 PM
  #3  
Chris L
Scooby Regular
 
Chris L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Andy, I think the giveaway was the 'and thanks to Cem Kocu for the Evo Mak' line at the end of the article
Old 06 February 2001, 12:52 AM
  #4  
TAZ 2414
Scooby Regular
 
TAZ 2414's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

How can that be????

Old 06 February 2001, 11:01 AM
  #5  
Blow Dog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Blow Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: London
Posts: 3,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post


Still not out in the shops yet!

Cem
Old 06 February 2001, 11:58 AM
  #6  
Rich_R
Scooby Regular
 
Rich_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

A few surprising results from the EVO test:

New shape impreza was slower round the dry handling circuit that the Clio 172

Less lateral G than Clio 172, Toyota Celica 190 & Ford Puma

Time exposed to danger (overtaking an artic at 45 mph) - same as a BMW X5 & GTI 6 & slower than Clio 172, Toyota Celica 190

0-100 Slower than Clio 172 and RenaultSport Clio V6

RenaultSport Clio V6 performed quite well all round.

Rich.
Old 06 February 2001, 01:16 PM
  #7  
Mungo
Scooby Regular
 
Mungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: West Byfleet, Surrey
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Rich_R:
<B>A few surprising results from the EVO test:


Time exposed to danger (overtaking an artic at 45 mph) - same as a BMW X5 [/quote]

Have you followed/been followed by an X5 on the road? Not terribly slow (straight line at least)
Old 06 February 2001, 01:32 PM
  #8  
DrEvil
Scooby Regular
 
DrEvil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

A quote from the page:Nürburgring, June 30 2000
This is my 18th lap on the track.
A Porsche 911 in front. Starting on stone cold Pilot Race tires, I take it rather easy at first...
Note how the Porsche almost crash into the green Subaru Impreza, trying to overtake before the S-curve at Hocheichen.
Laptime is approx. 9 minutes.

----

Now what I want to know is, do we know who the impreza in question is...

Old 06 February 2001, 01:33 PM
  #9  
JayDee
Scooby Regular
 
JayDee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Clio V6 is as different from normal Clio as Subaru WRC is from standard car (actually at least the WRC has the engine in the sane place!)

Still - pretty diapponting really

In a year I have to decide MY02, something else (Clio 172 NOT), or keep MY00.

JD
Old 06 February 2001, 01:57 PM
  #10  
Rich_R
Scooby Regular
 
Rich_R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Alex - LOL

Whilst I was at Powerstation last week I flicked through this month's Fast Car (purely for the Nurburg Ring article you understand ) only to see a picture of Tony Quinn at the Ring - fame for Tony at last (despite the insane grin) Didn't he go over last year with a certain person with a green scoob

Rich.
Old 06 February 2001, 02:02 PM
  #11  
Blow Dog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Blow Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: London
Posts: 3,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I saw the video, it was a T reg for what its worth
Old 06 February 2001, 08:43 PM
  #12  
Mike Tuckwood
Scooby Regular
 
Mike Tuckwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

KOOL!

If you want to see something impressive, have a look at the one of Jonathan (from England) who is on a Yellow Honda VTR (Firestorm). See the gap he opens up on the guy following on an R1 as they enter the track... Very, very Impressed!

<I>(Watch it you'll see what I mean if you know owt about bikes)</I>.

Old 01 March 2001, 12:49 AM
  #13  
jse
Scooby Newbie
 
jse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If you want to see something impressive, have a look at the one of Jonathan (from England) who is on a Yellow Honda VTR (Firestorm). See the gap he opens up on the guy following on an R1 as they enter the track... Very, very Impressed!
----
A little background info from the guy who filmed this lap:
The VTR in questions had a stock engine, but Maxton revalved suspension. It would have been in for a laptime of 8.50 if he hadn't ran out of gas. Powervice it is way behind the R1 (it was pulling away as a result of me not expecting such a quick start), but the handling was great. The movie showes that a VTR with a proper rider is capable of very decent laptimes. I know of several people with the latest spec bikes that never get below 9 minutes.

--
Joerund Seim
Copenhagen, Denmark

Old 01 March 2001, 01:45 PM
  #14  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Cool

Jaydee,
Have you thought about the new sti when its out??
As for the X5 and gti-6, the x5 has some considerable bhp, is about 286bhp which is quite meaty in anyones books!
Clio 172..... hmmmm some say its not as quick as the 306 gti-6, others say it suffers terrible torque steer (which ive seen on driven) but it does have the weight advantage over the subaru, my MY00 will be quicker thou and i prefer to have something practical that handles well in both the wet and the dry and doesnt give me torque steer in abundance actually something that doesnt give me torque steer at all

Tony
Old 01 March 2001, 01:48 PM
  #15  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Also remember that if the subaru is new its going to be very tight and there wont be alot of performance out of it, the clio v6 has more bhp than the scoob and is a right hooligans car damn id have one if the keys were handed to me lol!

Tony
Old 01 March 2001, 02:04 PM
  #16  
Robertio
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Robertio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 9,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Just a note, but my MY00 (only 204.5bhp, so power to weight half way between what it should be and a MY01) was no quicker than a Clio 172 between 50-110.

On the torque steer thing, I think it was Autocar that had one, and found that the geometry was miles out from when it left the factory, once that was sorted it handled a lot better, maybe a common fault?

Blowdog, was in the shops in Glasgow a week last Saturday, maybe you aren't looking at the right shelf
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
thunder8
General Technical
0
01 October 2015 09:13 PM
Nicky-nick
Middlesex Subaru Owner's Club
3
29 September 2015 02:02 PM



Quick Reply: Holy mary check these out...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 AM.