Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

wrx/turbo 2000 difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 July 2007, 08:26 AM
  #1  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default wrx/turbo 2000 difference?

anyone know what you get in the wrx as opposed to the turbo 2000's classic scoobs? or which is better/easier to insure?

ta
jon
Old 05 July 2007, 08:33 AM
  #2  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Code:
                                    WRX              Turbo 2000
Folding Mirrors                     Yes                 No
Rear Winscreen Wiper                Yes                 No
"Bright" Switch                     No                  Yes
BHP                                 240-260             208-215
Gearing                             SHorter             Longer
Air Con                             Yes                 Sometimes
Exhaust backbox                     Bigger bore         Twin Pea Shooter
Ins Group                           20                  17
Old 05 July 2007, 08:49 AM
  #3  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Didn't most WRX's come with better seats and better brakes too?

Alcazar
Old 05 July 2007, 09:01 AM
  #4  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Didn't most WRX's come with better seats and better brakes too?

Alcazar
DOn't think so, AFAIK it was the same for WRX and Turbo2000 i.e. 2 pots pre 98, 4 pots post 98. Seat were the same, pre 96-97, and then replaced with sportier seat in 96-97.
Old 05 July 2007, 09:41 AM
  #5  
myblackwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
myblackwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Didn't most WRX's come with better seats and better brakes too?

Alcazar
Nope brakes are fecking awful but did come with a better interior imo (my 93wrx came with standard sporty seats my mates N reg (UK) came with seats covered in what looked like tweed.

Not all wrxs come with folding mirrors either.
Late model wrxs came with 280ps (276bhp)
Old 05 July 2007, 09:48 AM
  #6  
DJ_Jon
911 C4 pilot
iTrader: (7)
 
DJ_Jon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In an Air Cooled Porsche
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what does that bright switch do.. only seems to make my dash clock light up a bit more

Last edited by DJ_Jon; 05 July 2007 at 09:52 AM. Reason: spelling
Old 05 July 2007, 09:52 AM
  #7  
soup dragon
Scooby Regular
 
soup dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stamford Bridge
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DJ_Jon
what does that bright switch do.. only seems to make my dash clock light up a bit more
Thats it mate.
Old 05 July 2007, 09:53 AM
  #8  
myblackwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
myblackwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DJ_Jon
what does that bright switch do.. only seems to make my dash clock light up a bit more
got it 1
Old 05 July 2007, 12:28 PM
  #9  
V4JDMSTi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
V4JDMSTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 12,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by myblackwrx
Nope brakes are fecking awful but did come with a better interior imo (my 93wrx came with standard sporty seats my mates N reg (UK) came with seats covered in what looked like tweed.

Not all wrxs come with folding mirrors either.
Late model wrxs came with 280ps (276bhp)

think it's the later sti's that came with 280. anyway the wrx figures are quoted using the 100ron fuel from japan. apart from the early ones which were 98ron iirc. gc8 should be arround somewhere to confirm.
Old 05 July 2007, 04:16 PM
  #10  
Ryo
Scooby Regular
 
Ryo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrighty338
anyone know what you get in the wrx as opposed to the turbo 2000's classic scoobs? or which is better/easier to insure?

ta
jon
To answer the insurance question. Turbo 2000 will be cheaper as it is a uk spec, non import car. Classic WRX are jap cars.
Old 05 July 2007, 04:43 PM
  #11  
V4JDMSTi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
V4JDMSTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 12,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

imports are a piece of cake to insure now and there's not that much difference between them if you go with a company that deals with imports. I do my insurance through gary moulson (moley wrx on here) at keith michaels. think it was £550 full comp with mods declared. 28 with 9 years ncb. live in a part of essex that'll hike up the premium too (near southend on sea)
Old 05 July 2007, 04:48 PM
  #12  
The rookie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
The rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warwickshire, UK
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Subtle engine differences, WRX is 9:1 CR, UK turbo 8:1, higher quoted power for WRX (240 rising to 276 on later saloons) is to JAE standards and a 240bhp WRX will give about 215 if tested to SAE/DIN standards.

Simon
Old 05 July 2007, 04:48 PM
  #13  
julian N/W wrx my93
Scooby Regular
 
julian N/W wrx my93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.helens!!!!
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my WRX MY93 doesn't have folding mirrors.......
Old 05 July 2007, 05:04 PM
  #14  
myblackwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
myblackwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mneame
think it's the later sti's that came with 280. anyway the wrx figures are quoted using the 100ron fuel from japan. apart from the early ones which were 98ron iirc. gc8 should be arround somewhere to confirm.
Facelift wrx are 280ps (276bhp) and all the stats for import imprezas would be based on the same fuel whether they are STIs or WRXs (comparing same year cars)
Old 05 July 2007, 05:26 PM
  #15  
V4JDMSTi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
V4JDMSTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 12,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

really? so what did the sti jdm facelift have? just curious.
Old 05 July 2007, 05:33 PM
  #16  
Scoobyspanners
Scooby Regular
 
Scoobyspanners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some early UK cars had Leather seats as an expensive option, not bucket seats but normal ones with the fabric removed. My car has this, looks nice as the door cards and mats are leather and colour coded too. Top speed of a UK car is not limited either, will do about 145 MPH if you can find some place to do that speed!! WRX 115 MPH limited I think.........
Old 05 July 2007, 05:47 PM
  #17  
myblackwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
myblackwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mneame
really? so what did the sti jdm facelift have? just curious.

Officially 280ps but more likely nearer 300ps but although the same power it's the way the STI would deliver it compared to WRX.
Old 06 July 2007, 07:25 AM
  #18  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is a wrx STI harder to insure then? as im ruling them out at the mo as iv been told i wouldnt get touched on one insurance wise....as if it isnt bad enough as it is!!!
Old 06 July 2007, 08:24 AM
  #19  
myblackwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
myblackwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by wrighty338
is a wrx STI harder to insure then? as im ruling them out at the mo as iv been told i wouldnt get touched on one insurance wise....as if it isnt bad enough as it is!!!
How old are you?
If you are willing to pay a lot then you can get insured.
Imports are group 20 (wrx or sti), Uk is group 17 (think someone mentioned this earlier in the thread)
Old 06 July 2007, 08:37 AM
  #20  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

20

gonna be paying a lot anyway..just wondered what difference the sti made
Old 06 July 2007, 11:22 AM
  #21  
The rookie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
The rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warwickshire, UK
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Try confused.com or similar and run some dummy quotes, by far the best way to compare quickly, an import was going to be about 25% dearer for me (40, lots of NCB £400 UK, £500JDM)

Simon
Old 06 July 2007, 11:29 AM
  #22  
babber
Scooby Regular
 
babber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scoobyspanners
Some early UK cars had Leather seats as an expensive option, not bucket seats but normal ones with the fabric removed. My car has this, looks nice as the door cards and mats are leather and colour coded too. Top speed of a UK car is not limited either, will do about 145 MPH if you can find some place to do that speed!! WRX 115 MPH limited I think.........
Top speed of a UK car is limited to 155 MPH. My limiter was removed when remapped and I've seen 165 MPH on my clocks on a private road with still a bit more to go...

Phill
Old 06 July 2007, 12:01 PM
  #23  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I couldn't get insured on an sti until I was 21.
Old 06 July 2007, 12:22 PM
  #24  
Marx Mcrae
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Marx Mcrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
I couldn't get insured on an sti until I was 21.
Neither could I, I've also been told since that alot of companies wont insure you till your 25. Someone please correct me there if im wrong
Old 06 July 2007, 12:37 PM
  #25  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah iv had a quote chaps, on a import wrx mind

i think il rule an sti out for the mo
Old 06 July 2007, 12:40 PM
  #26  
trails
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
 
trails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,347
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by myblackwrx
Facelift wrx are 280ps (276bhp) and all the stats for import imprezas would be based on the same fuel whether they are STIs or WRXs (comparing same year cars)
i don't think so else it would mean the sti's and wrx's had the same output...
Old 06 July 2007, 12:41 PM
  #27  
Paul JC
Scooby Regular
 
Paul JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A lot of the mainstreem insurance companys wont insure anyone under 25.
Old 06 July 2007, 02:22 PM
  #28  
myblackwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
myblackwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 8,787
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by trails
i don't think so else it would mean the sti's and wrx's had the same output...

And?
Why can't they have the same power output as governed by Japanese law (as with all japanese cars made before last year when Japan dropped that particular bit of legislation)
As i pointed out the STIs were most probably more powerful than Subaru admitted

Last edited by myblackwrx; 06 July 2007 at 02:25 PM.
Old 06 July 2007, 04:18 PM
  #29  
trails
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
 
trails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,347
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by myblackwrx
And?
Why can't they have the same power output as governed by Japanese law (as with all japanese cars made before last year when Japan dropped that particular bit of legislation)
As i pointed out the STIs were most probably more powerful than Subaru admitted
And...why would a manufacturer effectively out spec one of its own models by offering something just as fast for less money. simple economics.

its not governed by Japanese law, it was a gentleman's agreement between the major Japanese manufacturers.

to the best of my knowledge and everything i've ever read (witht the exception of your info ), wrx's are between 240 and 260bhp, the majority being 240bhp. classic sti's were 276bhp.

Last edited by trails; 06 July 2007 at 04:37 PM. Reason: speeling
Old 06 July 2007, 04:26 PM
  #30  
andyseston
Scooby Regular
 
andyseston's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: peterborough
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrighty338
is a wrx STI harder to insure then? as im ruling them out at the mo as iv been told i wouldnt get touched on one insurance wise....as if it isnt bad enough as it is!!!

i have just insured my sti for 600 with 4 years ncb and 28 years old


Quick Reply: wrx/turbo 2000 difference?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 PM.