Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

dyno plot.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #1  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default dyno plot.

hi all. just thought i,d post up a power graph (at last) of my scooby. just had it done today at powerstation. had the car new and about a month down the road decided on a few mods.

2.5 wrx

all work done at zen.

td04 removed and td05 fitted.
complete miltek decat and uppipe.
sti top mount fitted.
green filter
remap




look at the figures of wheel power and flywheel. there seems to be a big gap. is that right ?

Last edited by scooby2.5maz; Jan 2, 2007 at 08:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:30 PM
  #2  
Multijfj's Avatar
Multijfj
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Mansfield. Nottingham
Default

Not sure, but to give you an idea of comparrison -

Mine was rolled sadly due to BP ultimate fuking the boost up on my car, at 313bhp, with 249bhp at the wheels, and 468nm of torque

So you could be losing a hell of a lot of power somewhere, or innacturate rollers maybe
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:30 PM
  #3  
ex-webby's Avatar
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
Default

Good power for a WRX mate!

The MAHA RR is geared to give FLYWHEEL power. Dont compare the WHEEL given on this type of RR with others types. The Flywheel power should be as comparable though against other RR's.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #4  
shadower's Avatar
shadower
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

Hi

my 2.5 sti has been moded at zen

mods are

tdo6
hyperflow front mount
decat
cold air induction

without the front mount and cold air kit was 365bhp
rolling road at powerstation
will dig out the graph
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:35 PM
  #5  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

thankyou webmaster !
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

hi there shadower, how long ago did you have your car done at zen ? did you leave your sti top mount there ?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #7  
shadower's Avatar
shadower
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

yes i did about a month ago

sold them the top mount save bringing it home
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:52 PM
  #8  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

ha ha, think i have that fitted to mine. when i went up to zen to have turbo fitted and other bits i also was supposed to have sti top mount fitted but they forgot but said if i came up in a week or so they may have one as a chap was having a complete front mount fitted. i guess that was you then.

how does your car feel with the front mount and td06. you can imagine the smile on my face going from 230 bhp to 340. i couldnt stop grinning all the way back to worcester.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #9  
shadower's Avatar
shadower
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

Fantastic pulls in every gear to red line
big inprovement all round no turbo lag either
but it will be going back soon for pistons and rods then i can crank the boost up as its onlt pushing 1.3 bar

can t wait
have to make up excuses so i can go out for a blast
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #10  
bruce's Avatar
bruce
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Default

Nice rr plot scooby2.5maz, could you tell me what boost you are running on the TD05 and are you on the standard fuel injectors?

thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #11  
bob r's Avatar
bob r
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,381
Likes: 0
From: Probably polishing it.Lol
Default

Very impressive results and a great start to the new year.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 11:33 PM
  #12  
Robocop's Avatar
Robocop
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Old Detroit aka Chippenham
Default

Excellent torque curve.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #13  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

Originally Posted by bruce
Nice rr plot scooby2.5maz, could you tell me what boost you are running on the TD05 and are you on the standard fuel injectors?

thanks.


hi bruce, car was mapped by paul running 1.2 bar on standad 500 injectors.

Last edited by scooby2.5maz; Jan 3, 2007 at 08:06 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #14  
ex-webby's Avatar
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
Default

I didnt know they fitted 500's to a WRX now???
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #15  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

i didnt realise that either. thought that i would have needed some bigger ones for the job of running td05 but paul at zen said they were plenty up to the job saying that 500,s are fitted saving me a few quid
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #16  
Shark Man's Avatar
Shark Man
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
From: Ascended to the next level
Default

Bit dead in the water below 3000rpm for a 2.5
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #17  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by Shark Man
Bit dead in the water below 3000rpm for a 2.5
Torque is building rapidly just after 2000rpm, peaks just after 3000rpm.

My own car has a similar torque and power curves and feels very rapid from low revs, just compare where torque starts to climb on a 2ltr then you will see the benefit of the 2.5ltr

Andy
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #18  
Shark Man's Avatar
Shark Man
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
From: Ascended to the next level
Default

Sorry, I misread the numbers on the graph (bladdy Nm ). Curve looks lethargic, but the figures are high anyway

Still, when I can get a 2.0 peaking before 2700rpm, you can understand my initial viewpoint
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #19  
Butty's Avatar
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 1
From: MY06 STi Spec D
Default

Originally Posted by webmaster
I didnt know they fitted 500's to a WRX now???
I had heard that the same injectors were fitted to 2.5 WRXs and STis

Nick
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 02:40 PM
  #20  
shadower's Avatar
shadower
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

yes me too same in both cars
paul at zen told me mine are ok too after the turbo and map
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #21  
ex-webby's Avatar
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
Default

Well..... you learn something new everyday!
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #22  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

Originally Posted by Shark Man
Bit dead in the water below 3000rpm for a 2.5
On the road in 4th gear it makes a bar of boost by 2700 or something silly. THe boost is deliberately held back below 4000rpm to limit the torque a little. The car is anything but laggy I can assure you.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #23  
Robocop's Avatar
Robocop
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Old Detroit aka Chippenham
Default

With a minimum of 300 ft lb of torque (Nm/1.356 = ft lb) between 2900 and 6000rpm, that's a nice looking graph/figures that Zen have done for you there.

I'd imagine that this is a rapid WRX on the road.

As a comparison, here’s my graph for a Spec C Type 20 also using a Maha rolling road.


Last edited by Robocop; Jan 3, 2007 at 07:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #24  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Default

Very good figures, especially as it's at Powerstation (ie one of the more realistic dyno's IMHO). I bet it makes a very quick road car..

Is it a TD05 16g or 18g..?

Also, it does seem that the later (05>) 5sp gearboxes are better able to handle the extra torque, so no need to worry too much about that. (Before someone says it's going to disintegrate in not time..! )
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #25  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

Originally Posted by jasonius
Very good figures, especially as it's at Powerstation (ie one of the more realistic dyno's IMHO). I bet it makes a very quick road car..

Is it a TD05 16g or 18g..?

Also, it does seem that the later (05>) 5sp gearboxes are better able to handle the extra torque, so no need to worry too much about that. (Before someone says it's going to disintegrate in not time..! )


hi there jasonius, td05 16 fitted. cheers
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 07:43 PM
  #26  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

cheers for the comments guys.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #27  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Question

Originally Posted by Zen Performance
On the road in 4th gear it makes a bar of boost by 2700 or something silly. THe boost is deliberately held back below 4000rpm to limit the torque a little. The car is anything but laggy I can assure you.
Paul,
Do you know when Subaru 'uprated' the gearbox for the WRX..? I know you've mentioned this recently, however what exactly did they do, is it likely to improve reliability when running >300 ft-tb..?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #28  
scooby2.5maz's Avatar
scooby2.5maz
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 1
From: WORCESTER
Default

Originally Posted by jasonius
Paul,
Do you know when Subaru 'uprated' the gearbox for the WRX..? I know you've mentioned this recently, however what exactly did they do, is it likely to improve reliability when running >300 ft-tb..?


good question there jasionus, i hope so
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 09:33 AM
  #29  
rigga's Avatar
rigga
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: midlands......
Default

Originally Posted by scooby2.5maz
good question there jasionus, i hope so

i bet you do........
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #30  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Default

If you think that the 2.5 06 WRX PPP is rated at something like 310ft-lbs then given Prodrives cautiousness with regards to warranty (even taking into account their often 'optimistic' figures) it stands to reason that the 5 sp gearbox has been uprated. Probably from the 05 onwards when some gearbox modifications were mentioned in the press release (anyone have a copy of the press release of know of a web page..?).

I'd like to know as my 05 (2.0) is currently running ~340x330 and if my theory is correct then the gearbox should be just fine..
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.