wot exhaust
24 September 2006, 01:12 PM
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wot exhaust
hello folks its scooby newby again, i am still unsure between the blitz and vortex which were both recc. to me by your good selves . Is the blitz worth all that extra money compared to anything else , also i want the deepest and most aggresive tune .
24 September 2006, 01:29 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 360 gamertag is also Filfy
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scoobygez
nur spec r it is then
get one 2nd hand for £200 ish???
get one 2nd hand for £200 ish???
24 September 2006, 01:33 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BRONX NEW YORK
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my nur spec has been on my uk turbo and now my type r....
but on both cars too diferant noises altogether on uk very very deep but on type r more high pitched and not as deep coz of rev range the burble was more of a spaced out burble in normal driveing it was great on uk car!!!
but on both cars too diferant noises altogether on uk very very deep but on type r more high pitched and not as deep coz of rev range the burble was more of a spaced out burble in normal driveing it was great on uk car!!!
Trending Topics
27 September 2006, 07:48 PM
#20
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by filfy
My bruv has the nur spec r on his type r, i have the vortex.Even though they are to completly difrent noises i still say the vortex looks and sounds better
Do u think the vortex lets out more burble? and is it just as loud and deep? Ur probably the best person to describe to us the different sounds given by the two exhausts as u can listen to them both at same time.
I borrowed a friends blitz nur spec r for a few days. Looks wise, i would hav prefered the exit to be more angled. Sound wise, it was too loud at 1st thought but then i got used to it and loved the menacing sound. It was deep and macho. However, listening to the soundclips of the vortex on scoobyworld, the vortex gave out a more burbly sound rather than just a loud sound with not so noticeable burble..is this the case in reality i wonder? It will be interesting to hear ur views.
cheers
27 September 2006, 10:38 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BLITZ
has to be the blitz.......i had the same dilemma just a few months back....fitted a vortex to my mates 98 turbo with centre section........sounds and looks great i have to say.....in the end i went for the blitz cat back for my 97 turbo....it has bigger pipe work and a better finished centre section.......as for the sound between the two i would have to say under load the blitz is a bit louder and on tick over maybe the vortex sounds a bit better......the blitz does have the added benifit of the bung that you can fit for any long motorway driving to kill the drone.....but for me i love it......radio off foot to the floor and that roar when you pull away.......turns heads everyday....if it's about money you wont go wrong with the vortex.......at the end of the day the choice is yours........either way you will be smiling.
i know i am.
i know i am.
27 September 2006, 10:54 PM
#23
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Martin2005
is it too much to ask for people to spell 'what' properly
Im surprised that u had to make a comment about this. It might be because u are well in ur 40's and despise the youth of today because u hav had a bad experience with them in some way and thus despise their ways, including them setting the trend for shorthand in text messaging and the like. Ur grumpy. This is not good for ur health. Seek help. See a psychiatrist or go for counselling.
Having just scanned wat i hav typed above, it sounds as if im humouring u; im not. I am being serious! Let us know how u get on martin. Cheers
27 September 2006, 11:11 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by subutex
Its a bit like in text messaging martin...u tend to use a bit of 'shorthand' now and then to save spelling certain words in full where a shorthand version will suffice i.e wen one can understand clearly wat the word is meant to read. I wil admit some text message shorthands are hard to understand, but i wouldnt have thought much to realising what 'wat' is meant to read!! And after all, we are not sitting a grammar exam, are we...??
Im surprised that u had to make a comment about this. It might be because u are well in ur 40's and despise the youth of today because u hav had a bad experience with them in some way and thus despise their ways, including them setting the trend for shorthand in text messaging and the like. Ur grumpy. This is not good for ur health. Seek help. See a psychiatrist or go for counselling.
Having just scanned wat i hav typed above, it sounds as if im humouring u; im not. I am being serious! Let us know how u get on martin. Cheers
Im surprised that u had to make a comment about this. It might be because u are well in ur 40's and despise the youth of today because u hav had a bad experience with them in some way and thus despise their ways, including them setting the trend for shorthand in text messaging and the like. Ur grumpy. This is not good for ur health. Seek help. See a psychiatrist or go for counselling.
Having just scanned wat i hav typed above, it sounds as if im humouring u; im not. I am being serious! Let us know how u get on martin. Cheers
I thought that this was a forum, not some schoolboys texting site.
Why do I have to be over 40 just because I can be bothered to go through all the pain and suffering of spelling 'what' correctly?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM