Dyno shape comparison...
08 July 2006, 08:39 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno shape comparison...
Comments on the expected real world performance difference of these two overelayed plots (yellow/red v's black/black)..
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...5RRoverlay.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...5RRoverlay.jpg
09 July 2006, 01:56 AM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's a hefty chunk of torque there.
What is the spec on that then?
Real world differences:
The red and yellow will eat gearboxes!!
Never having been that high myself I'd say that will really fly after 3500!
Even at 2000rpm the torque is aproaching 200 so I'd guess it will pull away nicely and should be a good daily driver aswell.
What is the spec on that then?
Real world differences:
The red and yellow will eat gearboxes!!
Never having been that high myself I'd say that will really fly after 3500!
Even at 2000rpm the torque is aproaching 200 so I'd guess it will pull away nicely and should be a good daily driver aswell.
09 July 2006, 02:35 AM
#3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
Looks a bit like MY3-05 before and after a 2.5ltr conversion or possibly a MY06 Sti before and after an exhaust and Panel filter
Tony
Tony
Last edited by T5NYW; 09 July 2006 at 02:45 AM.
09 July 2006, 09:19 AM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah didn't notice the scale. I thought it was ft-lbs but it is nm. Thought there was a lot of torque!!!
In that case I'd say it is a remapped 2.0 with exhaust and filter running a vf35. What car is it? I would have expected a bit more from an sti if it has been mapped. Is it decatted? Might be wrong though.
Still a nice bit of torque though(just not the amount that I first thought!!!!). Should pull well. Looks like a good all round car.
In that case I'd say it is a remapped 2.0 with exhaust and filter running a vf35. What car is it? I would have expected a bit more from an sti if it has been mapped. Is it decatted? Might be wrong though.
Still a nice bit of torque though(just not the amount that I first thought!!!!). Should pull well. Looks like a good all round car.
Last edited by Tuts; 09 July 2006 at 09:21 AM.
Trending Topics
09 July 2006, 02:21 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Butty
Car B is newage 2.0 WRX PPP?
Car A is VF35. What else has been done?
Car A wins in every way. You'll really notice 3rd gear 60-100 improvement.
NIck
Car A is VF35. What else has been done?
Car A wins in every way. You'll really notice 3rd gear 60-100 improvement.
NIck
B: remapped TD04 (usual mods) Newage wrx (mine..
)C: remapped VF35 (usual Mods) classic (NS04..
)Looking at fitting the ported VF35/headers/inj/pump I have in the garage, but the only thing I was worried about was loosing the fantastic spool from my mapped TD04.
But IMHO, looking at these plots, the VF35 isn't that far away in terms of response, which is what people have generally been saying..
Nick, go to the top of the class..!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flat4x4-again
General Technical
2
29 September 2015 06:32 PM
hedgecutter
General Technical
3
25 September 2015 02:35 PM
StueyBII
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
5
22 September 2015 02:13 PM