Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Dyno shape comparison...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Question Dyno shape comparison...

Comments on the expected real world performance difference of these two overelayed plots (yellow/red v's black/black)..

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...5RRoverlay.jpg

Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 01:56 AM
  #2  
Tuts's Avatar
Tuts
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Default

That's a hefty chunk of torque there.

What is the spec on that then?

Real world differences:
The red and yellow will eat gearboxes!!

Never having been that high myself I'd say that will really fly after 3500!

Even at 2000rpm the torque is aproaching 200 so I'd guess it will pull away nicely and should be a good daily driver aswell.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 02:35 AM
  #3  
T5NYW's Avatar
T5NYW
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 11,479
Likes: 27
From: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Default

Looks a bit like MY3-05 before and after a 2.5ltr conversion or possibly a MY06 Sti before and after an exhaust and Panel filter

Tony

Last edited by T5NYW; Jul 9, 2006 at 02:45 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 05:27 AM
  #4  
StudentScooby's Avatar
StudentScooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
From: the dark side
Default

I heard that bhp wins arguements and toqure wins races! any truth in that?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
Tuts's Avatar
Tuts
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Default

Ah didn't notice the scale. I thought it was ft-lbs but it is nm. Thought there was a lot of torque!!!

In that case I'd say it is a remapped 2.0 with exhaust and filter running a vf35. What car is it? I would have expected a bit more from an sti if it has been mapped. Is it decatted? Might be wrong though.

Still a nice bit of torque though(just not the amount that I first thought!!!!). Should pull well. Looks like a good all round car.

Last edited by Tuts; Jul 9, 2006 at 09:21 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #6  
Butty's Avatar
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 1
From: MY06 STi Spec D
Default

Car B is newage 2.0 WRX PPP?
Car A is VF35. What else has been done?

Car A wins in every way. You'll really notice 3rd gear 60-100 improvement.

NIck
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #7  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

Ones an STi PPP and the other a WRX PPP? 316lb ft of torque... could be a newage JDM STi v a standard UK 2ltr STi?

Tony
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #8  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Cool

Originally Posted by Butty
Car B is newage 2.0 WRX PPP?
Car A is VF35. What else has been done?

Car A wins in every way. You'll really notice 3rd gear 60-100 improvement.

NIck
9.5/10..

B: remapped TD04 (usual mods) Newage wrx (mine..)

C: remapped VF35 (usual Mods) classic (NS04..)

Looking at fitting the ported VF35/headers/inj/pump I have in the garage, but the only thing I was worried about was loosing the fantastic spool from my mapped TD04.

But IMHO, looking at these plots, the VF35 isn't that far away in terms of response, which is what people have generally been saying..

Nick, go to the top of the class..!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
Oct 20, 2015 04:32 PM
Flat4x4-again
General Technical
2
Sep 29, 2015 06:32 PM
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
Sep 28, 2015 07:05 AM
hedgecutter
General Technical
3
Sep 25, 2015 02:35 PM
StueyBII
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
5
Sep 22, 2015 02:13 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 PM.