Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

0-60 times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 January 2006, 09:10 PM
  #1  
T6UNE
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
T6UNE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 0-60 times

does anybody know the accurate 0-60 times of standard scoobys, im particually interested in the 99 turbo 2000 as im getting one later this year, ive herd some wild claims of times they seem to variey between 5.2ish and 6.5ish. Also if you add a few simple mods i.e exhaust ect.. does it make much if any diffrence.

Thanks
Old 20 January 2006, 09:25 PM
  #2  
jjones
Scooby Regular
 
jjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 4,410
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

3.91 seconds, more if you have a trunk monkey but they are worth the minor acceleration penalty.
Old 21 January 2006, 10:47 AM
  #3  
bluepolarbear
Scooby Regular
 
bluepolarbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T6UNE
does anybody know the accurate 0-60 times of standard scoobys, im particually interested in the 99 turbo 2000 as im getting one later this year, ive herd some wild claims of times they seem to variey between 5.2ish and 6.5ish. Also if you add a few simple mods i.e exhaust ect.. does it make much if any diffrence.

Thanks
A bulk std one will give about mid 5s to 6 and around 14.5 for the qtr mile at around 98mph

http://www.bluepolarbear.freeserve.c...rformanceSpecs
Old 21 January 2006, 11:10 AM
  #4  
Daz1121
Scooby Regular
 
Daz1121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Think the quoted Subaru time is 6.1secs to 60mph bue Evo magazine have got it tested to 5.4secs.
Old 21 January 2006, 01:07 PM
  #5  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

The classics certainly are quicker to 60 than the official more conservative figures (unless the offical figures are 0-100km/h = 0-62mph ). I can vouch they will do 60 in sub 6 seconds.

All depends how you launch it off the line
Old 21 January 2006, 01:36 PM
  #6  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was quite surprised at the stopping distances. In the Highway Code, 70-0 mph is quoted as 96m. The Impreza does it in 47.6m.
Hmm, maybe its time the old blue book was updated!
Old 21 January 2006, 01:53 PM
  #7  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Yep, the highway code is vastly over-exagerrated, I think it's based on the stopping Distance of an Austin Seven driven by a man with matchsticks for legs

But (un)suprisingly, it can be quite accurate if you have fast road pads that are cold or cheap and nasty tyres on a wet road
Old 21 January 2006, 01:58 PM
  #8  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So hopefully my brand new standard replacment discs, pads (4 pots on an sti 4) and toyo t1-s tyres, should be good enough!
Old 21 January 2006, 02:10 PM
  #9  
SC008Y_MAD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
SC008Y_MAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 8,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Trunk monkey...hay... Click Me and/or here Click Me

Darren

Originally Posted by jjones
3.91 seconds, more if you have a trunk monkey but they are worth the minor acceleration penalty.
Old 22 January 2006, 12:13 AM
  #10  
madwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
madwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 296
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

sure gotta hurt that clutch to get under 6 secs in a standard scoob
Old 22 January 2006, 12:23 AM
  #11  
Dracoro
Scooby Regular
 
Dracoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you want to know what the fasted timed run? Or are you really wanting to know what car is REALLY the fastest? 0-60 is one of the most misleading scale out there at times.
Old 22 January 2006, 12:09 PM
  #12  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Car is capable of : Mid-to low 5s.

In the high 4s with a decat+boost controller.

OE clutch can handle plenty of abuse.


.....but from what I've seen at drag and 0-60/100mph events, not many people can achieve their book times.
Old 22 January 2006, 12:16 PM
  #13  
abbiesdad
Scooby Regular
 
abbiesdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
I was quite surprised at the stopping distances. In the Highway Code, 70-0 mph is quoted as 96m. The Impreza does it in 47.6m.
Hmm, maybe its time the old blue book was updated!
that was set back in the 60,s prob with a 2 ton austin cambridge and drum brakes..... and tweed pork pie trilby
Old 22 January 2006, 12:19 PM
  #14  
StanS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
StanS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Think it was a Ford Anglia with drums IIRC !
Stan
Old 22 January 2006, 12:39 PM
  #15  
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
16vmarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Shell Garage, York
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got a recorded time of 5.76sec at Melbourne, crap srface too! And i recorded 5.4sec with a G-Tech controller (2 up )

P1 Clutch and lightened fly, so really launched it!
Old 22 January 2006, 02:10 PM
  #16  
Mo
Scooby Regular
 
Mo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: the fastest rentals in town......0-100mph in 10 seconds
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can't recall exact figures but Stef pulled sub 5s with with timing gear with only a decat and K&N.
Old 22 January 2006, 02:26 PM
  #17  
scoobypeterpump
Scooby Regular
 
scoobypeterpump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Classic's Rule
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Impreza 2.0 Turbo UK (215Bhp) 0-60 5.60sec 0-100 15.87sec
1/4 mile 14.38sec
hopes this helps.
Old 22 January 2006, 02:58 PM
  #18  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobypeterpump
Impreza 2.0 Turbo UK (215Bhp) 0-60 5.60sec 0-100 15.87sec
1/4 mile 14.38sec
hopes this helps.
Old 22 January 2006, 03:01 PM
  #19  
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
16vmarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Shell Garage, York
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A search just returned 13.56sec 0-100mph.
Old 22 January 2006, 03:07 PM
  #20  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by StanS
Think it was a Ford Anglia with drums IIRC !
Stan
Nowt wrong with drums, just need a good strong leg ...Ford Anglias on the other hand....

...My Landy can get 98% braking force on the Talpey metre

Scoob can only muster 93%

Although when they get hot, fade can be an interesting issue, when the 3rd 60-zero stop requires both feet on the pedal
Old 24 January 2006, 12:35 AM
  #21  
T6UNE
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
T6UNE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks guys,
thats given me a rough idea, so u you recomn if u add just like an exhuat and induction kit you could drop it by maby .2 or.3 of a second or is that just imposible to calcuate because that would really depend on your start
Old 24 January 2006, 01:57 AM
  #22  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Backbox does nowt but make noise. Decat the centre and/or downpipe catalysts for more gains (although be aware of possible boost spiking on post 98 cars with decat downpipes).

Inductions kits are highly debated in terms of reliability to MAF sensors too.
Old 24 January 2006, 08:18 AM
  #23  
bbigman2000
Scooby Regular
 
bbigman2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin Area
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fastest car ive ever had to 60 was my Evo IVRS it was running autronics management, 310bhp at the wheels and well under a ton in weight, with a close ratio box, it was sub 4 seconds, it was like a motorbike.

My P1 was also pretty quick, my current car the 01 wrx is painfully slow, but hope that will change with the remap today
Old 24 January 2006, 01:28 PM
  #24  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Full decat, STi panel filter and manual boost controller would be my choice of 1st stage mods.
Old 24 January 2006, 01:31 PM
  #25  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.

<-- Thats with 266bhp at the wheels MY99 UK.

Originally Posted by bbigman2000
Fastest car ive ever had to 60 was my Evo IVRS it was running autronics management, 310bhp at the wheels and well under a ton in weight, with a close ratio box, it was sub 4 seconds, it was like a motorbike.

My P1 was also pretty quick, my current car the 01 wrx is painfully slow, but hope that will change with the remap today
Old 24 January 2006, 01:35 PM
  #26  
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
16vmarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Shell Garage, York
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hows that a standard engine then
Old 24 January 2006, 01:35 PM
  #27  
What if ?
Scooby Regular
 
What if ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've gat a MY05 STI PPP and did a few launches form 0-60 at the weekend:-
4.75 (not a very good start)

4.6 (ok start but still felt wrong)

4.45 (good start, slight wheel spin off the mark. Nt much clutch abuse (3,500 rpm launch). Felt good and not much more in the tank for improvement).

Running Tesco 99 fuel (full tank)
STI Panel air filter
Old 24 January 2006, 01:37 PM
  #28  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 16vmarc
Hows that a standard engine then
Because the engine is standard and untouched
Old 24 January 2006, 01:58 PM
  #29  
16vmarc
Scooby Regular
 
16vmarc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Shell Garage, York
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Something tells me your defination is slightly cleverer than my definition of a standard uk engine!
Old 24 January 2006, 02:01 PM
  #30  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Define...


Quick Reply: 0-60 times



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 AM.