my97 power graph - confused
#1
my97 power graph - confused
I've just had my my97 catalunya on the dyno. As far as a I am aware it is standard. It made the following figures (see below). Now, while I am happy with the bhp figure I am confused by the torque which seems very low. Also the bhp and torque curves don't cross at 5250 rpm like I thought they should.
Unfortunately the master of the dyno was away and another (trained) operator did the job.
Also they said the boost and oxygen figure were fine - can ne1 confirm this.
Thanks in advance
Nick
bhp / FtLb
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...bhp_torque.jpg
bhp / bar
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...07/bhp_bar.jpg
bhp / lambda
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...bhp_lambda.jpg
Unfortunately the master of the dyno was away and another (trained) operator did the job.
Also they said the boost and oxygen figure were fine - can ne1 confirm this.
Thanks in advance
Nick
bhp / FtLb
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...bhp_torque.jpg
bhp / bar
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...07/bhp_bar.jpg
bhp / lambda
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4...bhp_lambda.jpg
#2
Hmmm - it is physically impossible for the figures to not cross over at 5250, as Power (bhp) is a figure calculated from torque (lb/ft), and the calculation makes the figures cross at 5250. Are you sure it is not power at fly and power at wheels?
#4
It does look to be torque, but it is impossible for the the figures to not cross at 5252.
Horsepower is a measurement made from
(Torque * RPM) / 5252 - hence the impossibilty of the figures not crossing - a dyno measure torque and then calculates the power!
Horsepower is a measurement made from
(Torque * RPM) / 5252 - hence the impossibilty of the figures not crossing - a dyno measure torque and then calculates the power!
#5
Assuming you are making peak power @ 5.6krpms, then torque is 203lb/ft (at the same point), so way over what the figure is, meaning it cannot be torque!
Should also add, that a dyno run is usually done in 4th gear IIRC!
Should also add, that a dyno run is usually done in 4th gear IIRC!
Last edited by TonyFlow; 02 August 2005 at 05:30 PM.
#6
Thanks - that's what I thought. I questioned the torque and they said that it could have been 'scaled' wrong. It didn't occur to me at the time to point out that the curves should cross at 5252. They're going to bring it up with the operator when he returns.
Nick
Nick
#7
The main thing here guys is that the scale for both BHP and TORQUE is not the same on the graph..... that would certainly allow for the fact that BHP and TORQUE would never cross at 5250 on the graph that you show.
Unless the scale is the same on the printout, you will be unable to compare apples with apples.
Regards,
Shaun.
Unless the scale is the same on the printout, you will be unable to compare apples with apples.
Regards,
Shaun.
Trending Topics
#10
Originally Posted by webmaster
The main thing here guys is that the scale for both BHP and TORQUE is not the same on the graph..... that would certainly allow for the fact that BHP and TORQUE would never cross at 5250 on the graph that you show.
#11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't see whats wrong with it
0.9 bar peak, torque is about 170 peak, holds quite well at the top, hence the 217 HP
0.9 bar peak, torque is about 170 peak, holds quite well at the top, hence the 217 HP
#13
Originally Posted by Jay m A
Can't see whats wrong with it
0.9 bar peak, torque is about 170 peak, holds quite well at the top, hence the 217 HP
0.9 bar peak, torque is about 170 peak, holds quite well at the top, hence the 217 HP
lb/ft = (217 * 5252)/5600 therefore lb/ft at 5600rpms must equal 203.515.
Perhaps my maths is flawed, but from memory they are the calculations for power/torque!
#14
Originally Posted by BlueSimon
FYI, you left your reg plate number in - you might want to scrub it
I didn't know the calculation but it didn't seem right to me that it could make 217bhp with a torque figure of c.170 lb/ft, if the two are related. Also as the boost was ok and holding up to 5000 rpm.
Cheers
Nick
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: house in a street on the earth
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nick_Cat
It could be I suppose, but I asked where the power was taken from and they said at the flywheel. The right axis of the graph has FtLb as a title.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by webmaster
The main thing here guys is that the scale for both BHP and TORQUE is not the same on the graph..... that would certainly allow for the fact that BHP and TORQUE would never cross at 5250 on the graph that you show.
Unless the scale is the same on the printout, you will be unable to compare apples with apples.
Regards,
Shaun.
Unless the scale is the same on the printout, you will be unable to compare apples with apples.
Regards,
Shaun.
J.
#17
Now have the correct print out showing bhp and torque. Have posted it under the thread requesting power graphs:
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...t=power+graphs
Nick
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...t=power+graphs
Nick
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM