Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Type 25 In Autocar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27 July 2004, 04:09 PM
  #1  
Harry_Boy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Harry_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Type 25 In Autocar

Well, surprised that no other thread seems to have appeared on this topic....

Iain's Type 25 gains second spot in Autocar's Britain's Best Driver's Car feature....

For the record, the Noble M400 wins.
The Evo VIII MR FQ-340 is fifth.
And the M3 CSL is ninth.

Lap times round Brands Hatch?

M3 CSL 54.75 secs
Evo FQ 340 56.4 secs
Type 25 55.5 secs
Noble M400 52.6 secs
Old 27 July 2004, 04:19 PM
  #2  
Daz34
Scooby Regular
 
Daz34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: here
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How did the Clio do??
Old 27 July 2004, 04:53 PM
  #3  
Nezz10
Scooby Regular
 
Nezz10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

PMSL!!
Old 27 July 2004, 05:02 PM
  #4  
Trucker Ted
Scooby Regular
 
Trucker Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The clio was obviously towing the Noble
Old 27 July 2004, 06:45 PM
  #5  
T5NYW
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
T5NYW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Trucker Ted
The clio was obviously towing the Noble
LOL but it was only slightly Modded, Towbar

Tony

Last edited by T5NYW; 27 July 2004 at 07:46 PM.
Old 27 July 2004, 07:33 PM
  #6  
Harry_Boy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Harry_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daz34
How did the Clio do??
Funny you should ask mate....

A p1ss poor 60.0 sec lap.... Came 13th in the rankings overall.

'Course, it was only lightly modded....
Old 28 July 2004, 01:38 AM
  #7  
scrappydoo
Scooby Regular
 
scrappydoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These mags crack me up. One minute a car is great the next its rubbish. Take it all as lightly as possible guys. Next week the smart car will get a 45second lap time and win hands down cos its so light, lmao
Old 28 July 2004, 08:04 AM
  #8  
Kyl3cook
Scooby Regular
 
Kyl3cook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what's the deal with the type25? is it a 2.5 litre?
Old 28 July 2004, 08:09 AM
  #9  
nellie
Scooby Regular
 
nellie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kyl3cook
what's the deal with the type25? is it a 2.5 litre?

Yep its 2.5,different suspension,exhaust,remapped,etc loads of difference from the STI10 on which its based...
Old 28 July 2004, 08:43 AM
  #10  
Harry_Boy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Harry_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah - big tributes to Iain Litchfield for developing and sourcing.
Old 28 July 2004, 08:51 AM
  #11  
Wit0r
Scooby Newbie
 
Wit0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Howd the CTR do, lap time wise? (heard it got slated)
Old 28 July 2004, 11:35 AM
  #12  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought a standard Spec C was quicker than an M3 CSL? how come the "more powerful" T25 was slower?

Im not having a go......just i remember that artical that is always passed about with the CSL, spec C and GT3 in it.....

just curious.
Old 28 July 2004, 12:12 PM
  #13  
dc911
Scooby Regular
 
dc911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In that test the M3 CSL was 0.35 seconds quicker around bedford Autodrome than the Spec C so no it wasnt quicker around the track and that was with a normal driver putting the cars through their paces wheras in the Autocar article all cars were timed whilst being driven by the touring car driver.
Old 28 July 2004, 12:17 PM
  #14  
MikeWood
Scooby Regular
 
MikeWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe the Spec C wasn't standard then......
Old 28 July 2004, 12:18 PM
  #15  
dc911
Scooby Regular
 
dc911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont Litchfields remap the spec C's to 335 bhp and about the same torque though?
Where was the WR1 Mike?
Old 28 July 2004, 12:20 PM
  #16  
sti-04!!
Scooby Senior
 
sti-04!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Passing ...............
Posts: 13,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go on mike tell all
Old 28 July 2004, 12:25 PM
  #17  
MikeWood
Scooby Regular
 
MikeWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure, but I'm not in control of Subaru's Press cars!

Iain has a good relationship with Autocar as he accompanies his cars on every test, that's perhaps why he was asked to take his car along and keep an eye on it.

Look out for Rally XS next week to see what Chris Harris thinks of the WR1

Mike
Old 28 July 2004, 12:31 PM
  #18  
dc911
Scooby Regular
 
dc911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So where do you place the WR1 against its opposition in the Spec C and Type 25?
Old 28 July 2004, 12:38 PM
  #19  
MikeWood
Scooby Regular
 
MikeWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Based on what criteria? Road? Track?

What version of SpecC? As it leaves Japan, the version with the normal 'comfort' items or the spec that Litchfield sells or the spec that the Press drive?

Is an Official Importer/Manufacturer warranty important or is is just how fast it is in a straight line when you abuse the transmission?

Too big a question to answer in one line really but I know what I would want and we've got two of them..... as well as some of the others

Mike
Old 28 July 2004, 12:42 PM
  #20  
Edcase
Scooby Regular
 
Edcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

More tellingly mike, do you think there is a bigger market for the kind of car Litcho is producing with the T25?

Is it the sort of car you would like to be producing, taking away the restraints of IM / commercial reality?

Surely its only a matter of time before the Impreza (in whatever form it lives on in after 06/07) comes in the 2.5 litre guise with an ATD-style system anyway?
Old 28 July 2004, 12:46 PM
  #21  
mynickers
Scooby Regular
 
mynickers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London(ish)
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
I thought a standard Spec C was quicker than an M3 CSL? how come the "more powerful" T25 was slower?

Im not having a go......just i remember that artical that is always passed about with the CSL, spec C and GT3 in it.....

just curious.
Not sure if it was quicker, but they were tested together in Evo, that alone says volumes, when comparing rather large price difference.

£60k for CSL and £20 odd for a Spec C! CSL does sound awesome though, nice movie of CSL around the ring on fastdrive!

Here is some times at Bedford autodrome in back of Evo.

Radical SR3 1.16.45
Porsche GT3 1.19.40
BMW M3 CSL 1.19.95
Spec C 1.20.30
Evo VIII FQ300 1.21.90
TVR T350C 1.22.65

and middle of the list

*Unmoddified* Clio V6 255 1.24.15
Rarri 575M Fiorano 1.24.55
STI PPP 1.25.15

And six from the bottom:

Pug 106 GTI 1.30.95 (not bad for an aging hot hatch, I say, I say not three bad for an aging hot hatch). I bet it cocked up it's back leg aroudn the corners too Mr. Clarkeson!

To conclude the Radical kicks **** Spec C slightly slower than CSL but not much, not much for £40k difference in price for sure!

Last edited by mynickers; 28 July 2004 at 01:40 PM.
Old 28 July 2004, 01:23 PM
  #22  
LitchfieldImports
Former Sponsor
 
LitchfieldImports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: www.Litchfieldimports.co.uk
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Called Mike and all sorted now

The confusion comes from the perception that the JDM cars have 330bhp as standard. As I have said in numerous threads before when I have tested std (fresh of the boat) JDM STI or Spec Cs at Powerstation they have made around 285-290bhp and similar torque. We however remap all our MY03+ JDM cars and this brings their power to around 300bhp at Powerstation & 325 bhp at PE (not to say either one are more accurate). With the Milltek exhaust system we will see between 315-325bhp at Powerstation (depending on Mileage etc etc) but have not tested a car at PE yet.
All of the magazine articles mention that the car is remapped and has our Milltek sports exhaust fitted and most customers go for this option as well. I think people see the fiqures in print and presume that all cars are the same.

I hope the makes some sence

Iain
www.litchfieldimports.co.uk

Last edited by iainlit; 28 July 2004 at 04:02 PM.
Old 28 July 2004, 01:29 PM
  #23  
hawkeye
Scooby Regular
 
hawkeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

seems to me like theres some sour grapes going around at the moment and frankly I can see why.... everytime I read or see anything about the wr1 it seems that it contradicts especially the timings we have been told.

For everyones sake I hope that Prodrive get an invite to one of these testing days to finally prove exactly what the car can do.

Iain lit has proved it time and time again as far as i'm concerned fair play to iain for attending and backing the product he sells up.

I just don't understand why Prodrive don't get invited???
Old 28 July 2004, 01:37 PM
  #24  
mynickers
Scooby Regular
 
mynickers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London(ish)
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you ever need an assistant Iian, I am sure i could find space in my diary

Well done with Type 25 - sterling effort, some excellent PR as well!

Last edited by sammyh; 29 July 2004 at 12:10 PM.
Old 29 July 2004, 11:31 AM
  #25  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol @ mike wood,

I have never seen such a bad case of the green eyed monster in all my life.

I like the way you suggest dishonesty with a , nice display of intergity that!
Old 29 July 2004, 12:21 PM
  #26  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

having driven a spec c,wr1 and t25 i know which one i would drive-t25
the wr1 was nice but not as fast or as smooth as t25 which pulls from 1500rpm!! with the wr1 not having good enough overtaking ability compared to my car or the t25 but as i am sure people will point out it is probably the best prodrive could do due to IM limitations etc but the t25 must hold the subaru crown
martin
Old 29 July 2004, 12:36 PM
  #27  
Harry_Boy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Harry_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: WYIOC. The Foxglove, Kirkburton, Huddersfield.
Posts: 5,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by p1doc
the t25 must hold the subaru crown
And the worrying thing is that it's not even produced out of the box by Subaru....
Old 29 July 2004, 12:53 PM
  #28  
Hoppy
Scooby Regular
 
Hoppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Where age and treachery reins over youthful exuberance
Posts: 5,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you want a REALLY quick Impreza, buy a MY00 Classic (16% lighter) for under £10k and stick a 2.5 US block in it, sort the brakes and suspension, and help yourself to more bhp-per-ton than a 911 turbo. There will be a few of these cars rolling around soon, including mine

Okay, it's not quite that simple but it's not that hard, either. If you fancy a go, new 2.5 US short motors can be had for around £1,400 all-in. See the Group Buy forum.

Richard.
Old 29 July 2004, 01:11 PM
  #29  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

or speak to mark aigin at lateral performance to avoid the grief of going through a organisation and waiting of a group buy!
Old 29 July 2004, 01:21 PM
  #30  
MikeWood
Scooby Regular
 
MikeWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Adam

In no way am I saying that Iain has done anything that is remotely dishonest, just the opposite.

All the tests that have featured his cars accurately list the spec and state that he remaps the cars and in most cases thay have a different exhaust fitted, hence the 325/335 or whatever bhp that is quoted. He is more than upfront about this.

Where it all falls down is the people read the article and assume that ALL SpecC's have this power output when the reality is very close to the figures quoted by Subaru themselves.
Having driven several JDM cars recently I can tell you that they are a lot less than optimal if they are still running the std JDM calibration as it just doesn't work on our fuel and you would be seriously disappointed with the engine if you jumped in a std SpecC or STi expecting it to feel like it has 335bhp.

Mike


Quick Reply: Type 25 In Autocar



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 AM.