Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

octane Boosters - an alternative

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 February 2004, 11:55 AM
  #1  
10oftheBest
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
10oftheBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink octane Boosters - an alternative

I see that octane boosters are quite popular with Scooby owners - particually on the import models that are designed to run 100 ron fuel


does anybody on here use water injection ?

Water injection is used to cool the temperature of the air entering the engine, but is also used as an antidetonant by slowing the burn process of the fuel.

.................................................. ...........


Another type of additive is methanol

Methanol can be bought for about £1 per litre and can either be added to your fuel - or added in a 25% methanol / 75% water mix in the water injection system


.................................................. ..........

does anybody use it ?
Old 17 February 2004, 12:00 PM
  #2  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's a few Aquamist users on ScoobyNet. There's also a discussion somewhere in Projects about using methanol, I think.
Old 17 February 2004, 12:53 PM
  #3  
TopBanana
Scooby Regular
 
TopBanana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

methanol's nasty stuff - very corrosive
Old 17 February 2004, 01:15 PM
  #4  
10oftheBest
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
10oftheBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by jlanng
methanol's nasty stuff - very corrosive
Yes if used neat and left on aluminium it will cause aluminium oxide

however aluminium oxide actually protects the aluminium underneath it (a bit like anodising does) - so its not really a problem
Old 17 February 2004, 01:19 PM
  #5  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You wouldn't want too much of it on your skin though.
Old 17 February 2004, 01:22 PM
  #6  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.inchem.org/documents/hsg/hsg/v105hsg.htm

2.5 Effects on humans

Methanol is irritating to the eyes, skin and respiratory tract.
A broad range of ocular effects have been associated with longer-term
occupational exposure to lower levels of methanol. Acute oral and
inhalation exposures and, to a lesser extent, percutaneous absorption
of high concentrations of methanol have resulted in central nervous
system depression, blindness, coma and death.

Repeated or prolonged contact of methanol with skin may result in
dermatitis. Liquid methanol defats the skin. It is also an effective
extracting solvent and may damage the skin permeability barrier.

Nearly all the information on methanol toxicity in humans relates
to the consequences of acute rather than chronic exposure and the vast
majority of poisonings result from the consumption of adulterated
beverages or methanol-containing products. Although oral ingestion is
the most frequent route of poisoning, in severe and exceptional
conditions inhalation of methanol vapour and percutaneous absorption
of methanolic liquids are also effective in producing acute toxic
syndrome characterized by metabolic acidosis, central nervous system
depression, blindness, coma and death.

The severity of the metabolic acidosis is variable and may not
correlate well with the amount of methanol ingested. The variability
of the toxic dose is a prominent feature in methanol toxicity.

The symptoms of methanol poisoning, which may not appear for 12
to 24 h, include visual disturbances, nausea, abdominal and muscle
pain, dizziness, weakness and disturbances of consciousness ranging
from coma to clonic seizures.

The lethal dose of methanol for humans is not known for certain,
but is reported to range from 0.3 to 1 g/kg. Autopsies from victims
of lethal methanol poisoning reveal retinal and optic nerve
degeneration and gross pathology in the visceral organs, lungs and
central nervous system, involving a variety of oedematous,
haemorrhagic and degenerative changes.

Visual disturbances of several types (blurring, constriction of
the visual field, changes in colour perception and temporary or
permanent blindness) have been reported in workers exposed to methanol
air levels in excess of occupational exposure limits.

No epidemiological data are available to evaluate the
carcinogenicity of methanol for humans. Folate-deficient individuals
might be at greater risk of methanol toxicity compared to normal
individuals. Human populations that are potentially at risk of folate
deficiency include pregnant women, the elderly, alcoholics,
individuals with poor quality diets and individuals on certain
medication.
Old 17 February 2004, 02:30 PM
  #7  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

does anybody on here use water injection ?
Yes, but if you're really asking "Why don't you lot use WI instead of octane booster?", the answer, in addition to the points made above, is that octane booster is simply the easiest way to get the fuel on a Japanese market import Impreza up to the specifications the car is designed to run on.

Adding a water injection system involves the cost of the tank, pump and injection pipework, and, to get the most out of it, a remap.

So yes, while WI has its place, it isn't really an alternative to the widespread use many people make of commercial boosters.
Old 17 February 2004, 04:07 PM
  #8  
10oftheBest
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
10oftheBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greasemonkey
Yes, but if you're really asking "Why don't you lot use WI instead of octane booster?", the answer, in addition to the points made above, is that octane booster is simply the easiest way to get the fuel on a Japanese market import Impreza up to the specifications the car is designed to run on.

.

If you offset the cost of adding octane booster against the one off cost of using water injection - it may become a very attractive alternative

i wonder how much it costs to use octane booster for a 1 year / 12,000 mile period ?
Old 17 February 2004, 05:39 PM
  #9  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You're still missing the point a bit. To use water injection properly, not only do you need to factor in the cost of the WI kit, you need to factor in the cost of a remap.

As a remap alone is enough to prevent you being tied to a supply of octane booster on a Japanese market car, the water injection still counts as an unnecessary and avoidable cost.
Old 17 February 2004, 06:23 PM
  #10  
homer lawtey
Scooby Regular
 
homer lawtey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Water injection is an excellent knock suppressent (sp?), and is also supposed to be very good with a 50/50 methanol mix.

Another product coming onto the market in the states is propane injection as an alternative to water/methanol injection.

Both these products allow you to turn the boost up higher on standard intercoolers before encountering knock.

Steve
Old 17 February 2004, 09:11 PM
  #11  
10oftheBest
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
10oftheBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

GreaseMonkey

I don't quite know why anybody would want to remap a car to use water injection PMSL

if you were going to the bother to remap the car you would map it for uk fuel and be done with it

a years driving with octane boost would easily offset the cost of the water injection kit

and the great thing is water is free !! so its a once only cost

it also allows you to safely run more boost if you want to

Last edited by 10oftheBest; 17 February 2004 at 09:12 PM. Reason: grammer
Old 17 February 2004, 09:22 PM
  #12  
virgin
Scooby Regular
 
virgin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beds
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is interesting,unforntunaly i dont have the expertise to join in ):but...............i am learniing !
Old 17 February 2004, 10:24 PM
  #13  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

I don't quite know why anybody would want to remap a car to use water injection PMSL
Doh, Okay, let's start this again seeing as you've not quite got it yet.

If you installed a WI system on an otherwise standard car, using it will cost you a bit of power. However, if you use it, you'll be able (with a remap) to run more advance, thus getting your "lost" power back, and a bit more besides. Hence my comment that if you're going to run WI, you need a remap to make the most of it.

if you were going to the bother to remap the car you would map it for uk fuel and be done with it
Yes, I know. That's the point I was making. Wake up...

a years driving with octane boost would easily offset the cost of the water injection kit
...Or a remap, which is a far more effective way of making JDM cars run properly on UK fuel, which is where we came in...

Last edited by greasemonkey; 17 February 2004 at 10:25 PM.
Old 17 February 2004, 10:31 PM
  #14  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe people remap the car with water injection so as to release the benefits of water injection - running more advance.

If you didn't remap, I think I am right in saying that adding water injection reduces the power of the car. I'd rather increase octane than reduce power.
Old 17 February 2004, 10:34 PM
  #15  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool yeah, what he said

oops, cross posting there
Old 18 February 2004, 09:38 AM
  #16  
10oftheBest
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
10oftheBest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Doh, Okay, let's start this again seeing as you've not quite got it yet."

Have you mapped many cars in your time then ?

Perhaps its you who hasn't got it yet


Water injection is triggered to come on when your car is above a certain boost and when the ACT's are high (exactly the sort of conditions that will encourage det) you wouldn't want to use it in any other situation

When you add octane boost - its used all the time even when the car is idling at the traffic lights - bit of a waste really
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Primey
ICE
14
24 February 2017 12:46 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Primey
General Technical
2
30 September 2015 11:28 AM



Quick Reply: octane Boosters - an alternative



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 PM.