Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2000 turbo v WRX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 December 2003, 12:32 AM
  #1  
buzz_lightyear
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
buzz_lightyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hi,

being a noob to the scooby world wots the diff between a 2000 Turbo and a WRX? I am driving an Alfa156 at the moment and get blown away by a MY01 2000 Turbo wagon (not surprising, my 2.0TS alfa is only 155bhp). But mid jan im getting a MY04 WRX wagon and wonder how that will compare to the 2000 turbo?

cheers
Old 20 December 2003, 01:09 AM
  #2  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

"Turbo 2000 AWD" is the official name given to the UK market older shape turbocharged Imprezas (i.e. model year 2000 and earlier). When the new shape car was introduced, Subaru UK started to sell them as WRX's.

Asking how an older shape UK Impreza compares with a new shape UK car is a bit like asking how a mature cheddar cheese compares with a mild cheddar. They're similar, but there are subtle differences, and in any case, a lot depends on whether the older car you're talking about is modified in any way.

In general, the older cars tend to be a bit quicker given a similar level (or lack of) modification, but the newer cars have better quality interiors and are generally more refined.

They're very similar in terms of overall performance however. If someone in a relatively standard old shape car shows you a clean pair of heels on the road, it'll mainly due to he/she being a better driver, or being content to take greater risks.
Old 20 December 2003, 10:33 AM
  #3  
buzz_lightyear
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
buzz_lightyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

ok - but this 2000 turbo i see (albeit from the back!) is a 51 plate and looks like the 'new' model - but definately does not have WRX on the back? So it will still be 225bhp etc?
Old 20 December 2003, 10:57 AM
  #4  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If you're absolutely sure it's a bugeye, it will be a WRX. If it happens to have a "Turbo 2000" (or whatever) badge on the back, it's because the owner has been doing a bit of customisation.

No, the bugeye WRXes have 215bhp as standard, and a more restrictive exhaust system than is fitted to the MY03 and onward cars.
Old 20 December 2003, 12:21 PM
  #5  
buzz_lightyear
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
buzz_lightyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

oh ok - thats raises another question then! wot does 'bugeye' cover? is that all non-classic versions or just early new models? i think the latest are called impreza III. like i said im a noob to the scooby world - but cant _wait_ to get my new one! forget xmas, i'm counting the days down til 16th jan!! :-)
Old 20 December 2003, 12:45 PM
  #6  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

"Bugeye" was the none-too flattering nickname that the new shape car quickly attracted when it was released. This shape was in production through the 2001 and 2002 model years.

The unpopularity and relatively poor sales of this version of the car compared with its predecessor resulted in panic at Subaru, and a quick makeover, with cosmetic changes designed to freshen the car's looks, along with subtle engine and exhaust modifications to boost power a little, and some weight reduction in an attempt to reduce the bugeye's girth.

The facelifted car was brought in for the 2003 model year. It's this version of the car that is marketed as the "Impreza III" in the UK, and is often referred to here as the "blobeye", for obvious reasons.
Old 20 December 2003, 12:50 PM
  #7  
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

There are a few late registered 51 plate classics about. There are also quite a few 51 plated P1's running around
Old 20 December 2003, 12:58 PM
  #8  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yep, tis true. Was thinking of this as the likeliest explanation myself, but Buzz seems certain it was a new shape car...
Old 20 December 2003, 01:09 PM
  #9  
hades
Scooby Regular
 
hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Some weight reduction? I don't believe a blobeye is any lighter than a bugeye?

Main difference seems to be that the bugeye had an extra catalyst in the up-pipe (before the turbo), whilst most people tell you that the blobeye doesn't, and there are subtle tweaks to the blobeye engine management. Whilst power has only gone up to 222bhp (225PS), the performance gains are noticeable. However, modify them both (new exhaust and ECU), and they'll give almost identical figures.
Old 20 December 2003, 01:13 PM
  #10  
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

my03 is 10kgs heavier but has a slightly different 'zorst

did it look like this at the back ?



and front




Old 20 December 2003, 01:33 PM
  #11  
donutman
Scooby Regular
 
donutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

chrisp i think it was a wagon he saw so i would look a little different

Old 20 December 2003, 01:49 PM
  #12  
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

LOL doh! didnt see the wagon bit, but the front should be similar
Old 20 December 2003, 03:20 PM
  #13  
buzz_lightyear
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
buzz_lightyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

'blobeye'? yikes am i gonna pay all that company car tax on a car called a 'blobeye' :-( and i thought bugeye sounded bad... ah well 0-60 in under 6 should keep my smiling!

yeah this wagon that murders my current Alfa156 is a 'bugeye' [see how i know the terms now ;-)] but not a WRX - i came up behind him at a roundabout - only way i could get close! could be an import?

neways, still cant wait to drive my 'blobeye'...

cheers!
Old 20 December 2003, 03:27 PM
  #14  
SimonD
Scooby Regular
 
SimonD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Maybe not a Turbo?!
Old 20 December 2003, 05:23 PM
  #15  
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

ah well 0-60 in under 6 should keep my smiling
Under six is fun but under five is funnier
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blockhead
Subaru Parts
19
07 November 2015 11:50 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM
MH-Racing
Subaru Parts
18
18 October 2015 04:49 PM
blockhead
Subaru Parts
5
25 September 2015 12:58 PM



Quick Reply: 2000 turbo v WRX?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.