chrisj1260

Which one ether

wrx type ra 1995
wrx 1994
supra tt 1994

what you lot think ..............cheers chris

M3 Evo

twin turbo supra

No WRX stands a chance

mikeesingh

iTrader: (3)

RA best on track

mikee

johnfelstead

RA

Katana

<-----

chrisj1260

well ive got all three still dont no which one to keep dont want to use my wrx MY02 scaird of braking it ............. thanks foe the help so far but what about some + and - points ........thanks chris

chrisj1260

katana whats that ...............

Andy W

I believe he is pointing out the fact that he owns an RA,
I would say an RA would probably be my choice, although I must confess I like the Idea of the Supra but know little about them.
Andy

chrisp

A supra is just too big and heavy for track its a GT really, you want something lightweight and nimble. Takes some braking effort to stop a car from 130mph continually. The lighter the load the easier the braking. The supra may be okay for a couple of laps then my guess it would start to have braking problems. The RA is the choice due to the close ratio box ie you dont need the top speed.

Must say if I was after a pure track car I would be looking for a cater/field type car or maybe an early elise. The consumable bits on the westfields are a lot cheaper and would make sense over a season, being a kit car you should be able to do 99% of the work yourself as well.

darlodge

Chris,

I am assuming that Katana is reffering to the fact that he has a RA. In his profile on the left hand side (left to his post) it states this. So Katana is suggesting the RA would be best.

I am probaly wrong though

Darren

chrisj1260

I import cars from japan for a living so it must be japanese
as the parts i can import also but its looking like the ra as i drive a scoob every day do love them .......cheers chris