SUL vs NUL - SUL wins!
23 May 2001, 04:45 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi all..
Ive been running SUL for the last few weeks.. and NUL before that.
With NUL, I was averaging 26 mpg.
With SUL, I am averaging 28 mpg.
NUL costs typically 77.9 p/litre
SUL costs 82.9 p/litre
That means it cost me 13.6 p/mile for NUL.
And it cost me 13.4 p/mile for SUL.
SO.. get to have faster/smoother car... and cheaper too!!
SUL rules (unless the price/litre gap widens more)
Ive been running SUL for the last few weeks.. and NUL before that.
With NUL, I was averaging 26 mpg.
With SUL, I am averaging 28 mpg.
NUL costs typically 77.9 p/litre
SUL costs 82.9 p/litre
That means it cost me 13.6 p/mile for NUL.
And it cost me 13.4 p/mile for SUL.
SO.. get to have faster/smoother car... and cheaper too!!
SUL rules (unless the price/litre gap widens more)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acemodder
ScoobyNet General
50
01 October 2015 07:01 PM
