Turbo efficiency with different volume
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NewZealand
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo efficiency with different volume
Hey all,
I was just wondering something, does a smaller capacity engines affect turbo efficiency in terms of spooling times etc?
Also with a smaller engine would you require less boost to acquire the same amount of compression form a bigger engine i.e would the EJ20 require less boost than the EJ25 would require to get the same power results because I would have thought if 15psi of boost went into both engines, the 2.0 would have higher compression therefore more power (however the EJ20 would probably have a harder time getting the boost than the EJ25).
Cheers, Dazz
I was just wondering something, does a smaller capacity engines affect turbo efficiency in terms of spooling times etc?
Also with a smaller engine would you require less boost to acquire the same amount of compression form a bigger engine i.e would the EJ20 require less boost than the EJ25 would require to get the same power results because I would have thought if 15psi of boost went into both engines, the 2.0 would have higher compression therefore more power (however the EJ20 would probably have a harder time getting the boost than the EJ25).
Cheers, Dazz
#2
Hey all,
I was just wondering something, does a smaller capacity engines affect turbo efficiency in terms of spooling times etc?
Also with a smaller engine would you require less boost to acquire the same amount of compression form a bigger engine i.e would the EJ20 require less boost than the EJ25 would require to get the same power results because I would have thought if 15psi of boost went into both engines, the 2.0 would have higher compression therefore more power (however the EJ20 would probably have a harder time getting the boost than the EJ25).
Cheers, Dazz
I was just wondering something, does a smaller capacity engines affect turbo efficiency in terms of spooling times etc?
Also with a smaller engine would you require less boost to acquire the same amount of compression form a bigger engine i.e would the EJ20 require less boost than the EJ25 would require to get the same power results because I would have thought if 15psi of boost went into both engines, the 2.0 would have higher compression therefore more power (however the EJ20 would probably have a harder time getting the boost than the EJ25).
Cheers, Dazz
The bigger engine will always make more power and torque at the same boost level as the smaller engine.
A bigger engine will spool a turbo sooner than a small one due to the increased VE and exhaust volume, however too small a turbo on a
Big engine will restrict maximum boost and rpm potential, ie the turbo need to be big enough to flow the extra cfm for the extra flow of te engine.
Bigger is always better
#3
Scooby Regular
#6
Scooby Regular
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
A higher compression will be more urgent and responsive.
The higher the compression the closer you get to the knock threshold so it limits the amount of airflow it will swallow
#10
His conception of adibatic compression vs static compression is a bit mixed up, then even further adding to the mix up engine size and spool rate.
So to summarise you want the biggest engine with the highest compression ratio and smallest turbo with the best quality fuel and intercooler to make the power you desire. This will yield the best response and effecientcty possible.
Last edited by boosted; 09 July 2016 at 10:14 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post