Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

rear arb Q

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 February 2016, 02:44 AM
  #1  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default rear arb Q

Would a thicker rear sway bar mess up high speed sweeping corners as a mod on its own? The car feels very fantastic in most situations with no real under or over steer but id like to have fun in the wet sometimes as its impossible to get the back out on a stock suspension set up. Will this just be a compromise for abit of fun at the expense off handling? Or does one realy help on all type of cornering Situations?

Dccd would be ideal for me as I have it set right back in the wet for some sliding action.

But some off us don't have that option so be nice to hear some opinions on just adding a rear arb.
Not looking to lower the car on shorter springs as this is usually a bad idea without matching struts. And I'm not interested in coilovers. Just abit less understeer.

Cheers SS
Old 21 February 2016, 03:20 AM
  #2  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Drift mode on new RS sounds interesting! Would that be comparable dccd on wide tracks?
Old 21 February 2016, 02:06 PM
  #3  
plenty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
plenty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 771
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

The most rear-biased of the Imprezas are the classic or blob DCCD cars which have a 35F:65R torque split.

You can certainly introduce more mobility at the rear with a thicker arb too.
Old 21 February 2016, 03:17 PM
  #4  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Yes, but leave the front standard, and don't go more than one size thicker.

Solid droplinks all round help too. And don't be tempted t lower it, it mucks up the handling.
Old 21 February 2016, 07:17 PM
  #5  
sy.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
sy.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: west mids
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tyres play a big part regardless of playing with the dccd or diff Arb, good fronts poor rears and damp greasy road job done
Old 01 March 2016, 12:46 AM
  #6  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sy.
Tyres play a big part regardless of playing with the dccd or diff Arb, good fronts poor rears and damp greasy road job done
Exactly what I'm NOT after. I actuly like the 50/50 split as it makes the car so predictable.
I want good rubber all round and stock springs and shocks.
But I'm sure there must be a trade off for just adding a thicker rear arb for some slow speed fun in the wet. I'm assuming the car will feel more sketchy on say long sweeping 70mph corners where you hit rough ground or elevation changes. This could possibly lead to a sketchy moment.
I don't know why upgrading the rear and leaving the front alone would have any benefits apart from abit of sideways action on wet roundabouts in the wet (if that's even possible on a newage wrx as the understeer under power in the wet is so great I doubtful even the thickest rear arb will get me handling more like a rwd car on its own!
So my guess would be upgrading both front and rear would be the best bet from a handling perspective. But like I said I have my doubts what if anything a rear on its own would do to a newage wrx. Thanks

Last edited by south_scoob; 01 March 2016 at 12:50 AM.
Old 01 March 2016, 12:57 AM
  #7  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do have a couple of spare rims I could fit seccond hand ditch finders to.

Pump them up to 60psi and go drifting all I want. However doing that would make me think I've bought the wrong kind off car

Trending Topics

Old 01 March 2016, 10:27 AM
  #8  
InTurbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
InTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oxford
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine is neutral and adjustable.
Camber settings have been reversed from the oem set up, So one and a half degrees up front and only a degree in the rear.

Added a small increase in rear roll bar resistance and left the front standard.

And finally a bit of front rake lowers the front roll centre and increased it in the rear, also helping to reduce oversteer.

Altogether very neutral with dccd in auto and very oversteer based with rear bar set on the stiffer setting and dccd set to rear most setting.

Last edited by InTurbo; 01 March 2016 at 10:28 AM.
Old 01 March 2016, 10:48 AM
  #9  
2pot
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (3)
 
2pot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,838
Received 90 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

There are the down sides you've mentioned + potential for oversteer in an emergency situation.
But, a bigger rear bar transfers grip diagonally, from the the rear, to the front.
So, although you've lost more grip at the rear, than you've gained at the front, the overall balance is more neutral.
If you enlarged both bars, by the same amount, you'd end up with the same understeering balance.

For track use, a bigger front bar, with sticky tyres, would stop the front camber curve collapsing. So, although you'd eventually get understeer, it would be at a much higher speed - so you might not experience it. Balance the rear, with a bar that suits you.
Old 01 March 2016, 11:13 AM
  #10  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks this is a road going car only question. I don't think its seen any track action due to the only mod being the obligatory cat back system.

Although I've upped the power abit I feel it would struggle against more purposeful machines on track.

So what would "one size up" be for the rear? Would a standard sti bar do the job. Or is an adjustable one like whiteline etc with the extra? Thanks.
Old 01 March 2016, 11:28 AM
  #11  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2pot
There are the down sides you've mentioned + potential for oversteer in an emergency situation.
But, a bigger rear bar transfers grip diagonally, from the the rear, to the front.
So, although you've lost more grip at the rear, than you've gained at the front, the overall balance is more neutral.
If you enlarged both bars, by the same amount, you'd end up with the same understeering balance.

For track use, a bigger front bar, with sticky tyres, would stop the front camber curve collapsing. So, although you'd eventually get understeer, it would be at a much higher speed - so you might not experience it. Balance the rear, with a bar that suits you.
I think i understand what your saying. The cars set up to be understeery as the wrx is the more comfortable less handling orientated model and understeer equals safety. Fitting a rear bar alone would make the car feel more neutral.

But the thing is under most conditions I get neither over or understeer. Just alot off body roll. And by alternative name (anti sway bar) upgrading the front and rear together should eliminate alot of the body roll whilst keeping the all important wrx "magic carpet" ride?

Getting the back out occasionally in the wet controllably would be a bit of a bonus but I am abit bored with the handling now and do want to spice things up abit!

Last edited by south_scoob; 01 March 2016 at 11:42 AM.
Old 01 March 2016, 11:37 AM
  #12  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I meen most conditions I meen feeding the power in when driving fast
The td04 is hardly a kick in the back type turbo so controlling the understeer is usualy easy enough.
But it does show its ugly head from time to time and just knowing there's no movement at all in the rear can make the wrx rather dull to drive fast.

Last edited by south_scoob; 01 March 2016 at 11:39 AM.
Old 01 March 2016, 11:57 AM
  #13  
2pot
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (3)
 
2pot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,838
Received 90 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by south_scoob
I think i understand what your saying. The cars set up to be understeery as the wrx is the more comfortable less handling orientated model and understeer equals safety. Fitting a rear bar alone would make the car feel more neutral.

But the thing is under most conditions I get neither over or understeer. Just alot off body roll. And by alternative name (anti sway bar) upgrading the front and rear together should eliminate alot of the body roll whilst keeping the all important wrx "magic carpet" ride?

Getting the back out occasionally in the wet controllably would be a bit of a bonus but I am abit bit with the handling now and do want to spice things up abit!
Standard struts are designed to control a certain spring rate and a certain bar size. Both springs and bars combine to give a rate.
With larger bars, your standard struts would be under-damped, create heat and lead to excessive wear.

As 'InTubo' mentioned rake is important:
A, relatively, higher rear ride height, moves the roll centre rearward, increasing rear roll resistance.
That, in turn, makes the front end roll more - helping turn-in response and reducing understeer, without the use of stiffer bars.
You want the smallest bars possible, on a road car, to avoid 'roll-rock'.
Roll-rock:
If the spring rate is relatively low and the sta bar is too stiff, a suspension movement, initially, occurring on only one side of the vehicle, will be transmitted to the other side, inducing an unsettling 'roll-rock' motion.

Excessive body roll?:
What mileage have the struts covered?
Old 01 March 2016, 12:15 PM
  #14  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

(edit 105k). but emissions aside I get my car thoroughly mot'd and would be told if any suspension components are worn. I wouldn't say excessive but it doesn't corner as flat as I like. But I guess from what you've said there's always a downside to an upside in this category.

Would my car have the adjustability as standard to do a full fast road geo setup? I tried with previous cars and have been told camber etc is not an adjustable feature. I was thinking about doing this anyway as I'm almost certain it needs it although I'm not getting any off the usual signs eg. uneven tyre ware.

Might also go for the smallest increase in rear arb one with the three settings soft medium and stiff and see were that takes me. Thanks for explaining everything!

Last edited by south_scoob; 01 March 2016 at 12:21 PM.
Old 01 March 2016, 12:28 PM
  #15  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I take it the rake on a Subaru is the opposite of what you mentioned. Ie higher front then back. Why do they do this? I suppose the only fix for something like that would be a full set off coilovers which wont be happening
Old 01 March 2016, 12:29 PM
  #16  
2pot
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (3)
 
2pot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,838
Received 90 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by south_scoob
(edit 105k). but emissions aside I get my car thoroughly mot'd and would be told if any suspension components are worn. I wouldn't say excessive but it doesn't corner as flat as I like. But I guess from what you've said there's always a downside to an upside in this category.

Would my car have the adjustability as standard to do a full fast road geo setup? I tried with previous cars and have been told camber etc is not an adjustable feature. I was thinking about doing this anyway as I'm almost certain it needs it although I'm not getting any off the usual signs eg. uneven tyre ware.

Might also go for the smallest increase in rear arb one with the three settings soft medium and stiff and see were that takes me. Thanks for explaining everything!
You'll get more of a performance advantage by renewing the dampers, every 50/60k.
By all means try a rear bar on it's lowest setting, to start with.
Do not underestimate the part played by the bump stops, they are a wear item.

Camber is adjustable - what yr/model Impreza?

Last edited by 2pot; 01 March 2016 at 12:34 PM.
Old 01 March 2016, 01:24 PM
  #17  
2pot
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (3)
 
2pot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,838
Received 90 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by south_scoob
I take it the rake on a Subaru is the opposite of what you mentioned. Ie higher front then back. Why do they do this? I suppose the only fix for something like that would be a full set off coilovers which wont be happening
The Impreza has positive rake, it's the profile of the arches, that make it look negative.

There are alternatives for increased positive rake, if you've got a classic?

https://www.scoobynet.com/991887-pro...tunity-14.html
Old 01 March 2016, 01:42 PM
  #18  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its actuly a newage. From what I gathered id be more then happy with handling off a classic. 04 blobeye to be precise.

Maby I came across incorrectly. There's nothing "wrong" with the way my car handles in fact compared to most cars I've owned its decent. But being a wrx its a bit numb. However I'm not willing to sacrifice ride quality as Imo its a positive things that sets it apart from other performance cars that all seem to have a harsher ride then the wrx. If the noise, bonnet scoop and spoiler in the rearview wernt there you could be driving a mondeo etc in comfort terms. So maby I'm barking up the wrong tree looking for handling changes.

Last edited by south_scoob; 01 March 2016 at 01:45 PM.
Old 01 March 2016, 01:52 PM
  #19  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2pot
The Impreza has positive rake, it's the profile of the arches, that make it look negative.

There are alternatives for increased positive rake, if you've got a classic?

https://www.scoobynet.com/991887-pro...tunity-14.html
I think everyone needs to speek to someone like you before doing mods to there car.

I read somewhere recently somebody who fitted front lowering springs just to the front of his impreza to "level" it out when clearly if your right the rear just looks like its squatting due to the body shape?

I asume that guy would totally mess up his handling with miss matched spring rates front and rear and a more heavy rake then standard!
Old 01 March 2016, 01:55 PM
  #20  
2pot
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (3)
 
2pot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,838
Received 90 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by south_scoob
Its actuly a newage. From what I gathered id be more then happy with handling off a classic. 04 blobeye to be precise.

Maby I came across incorrectly. There's nothing "wrong" with the way my car handles in fact compared to most cars I've owned its decent. But being a wrx its a bit numb. However I'm not willing to sacrifice ride quality as Imo its a positive things that sets it apart from other performance cars that all seem to have a harsher ride then the wrx. If the noise, bonnet scoop and spoiler in the rearview wernt there you could be driving a mondeo etc in comfort terms. So maby I'm barking up the wrong tree looking for handling changes.
Re-new your dampers and bump stops, as a matter of course.

These are good:
https://www.scoobynet.com/group-buys...mited-run.html
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raceface_13
ScoobyNet General
28
10 May 2016 02:22 PM
cam87
Styling
7
21 February 2016 09:41 PM
yabbadoo4
Suspension
10
09 February 2016 10:38 AM
bruce1986
ScoobyNet General
13
31 January 2016 12:04 PM
moggy1000
ScoobyNet General
11
28 January 2016 05:41 PM



Quick Reply: rear arb Q



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 PM.