Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Widetrack STI vs E92 M3 Opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23 January 2016, 09:08 PM
  #1  
cover99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
cover99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Widetrack STI vs E92 M3 Opinions

Always going to be a bit of a weird question.. Owned an STI 9 wide track many years ago (Andy forrest map), went to a mk2 rs (Did not like it much...) and currently driving an E92 M3 (2012). Its been along time since I have driven the Subaru but always had a tug on the heart strings to go back to a V9 blob STI as I do not like the look of the hatch or the new saloon. As a long time has passed I wondered if I would now find the Scooby slow in comparison.

Anyway if anyone has made the step back in time or has went from an M3 back to the Subaru fold please let me know what you thought, good or bad decision.

Thanks again for any advice. Cheers
Old 23 January 2016, 10:21 PM
  #2  
chrispy200+
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
chrispy200+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Type R into a Dakar edition dct m3 eventually into a modified wide track, obviously a much cheaper car but if I had a choice and money wasn't an issue it would be the m3, just a much better car, but then having it sitting there doing about 4K a year I couldn't justify
Old 23 January 2016, 10:27 PM
  #3  
chrispy200+
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
chrispy200+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Power delivery is completely different, both cars are similar power but the m3 just feels quicker, the dct helps also
Old 23 January 2016, 10:41 PM
  #4  
Peedee
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Peedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: W / London
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am considering an E92 M3 at the mo, always liked the look of them. They seem to vary drastically in price for some reason though?

OP, what was it about the MK2 RS you didn't like? This is also on my list.

Last edited by Peedee; 23 January 2016 at 10:43 PM.
Old 23 January 2016, 10:46 PM
  #5  
chrispy200+
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
chrispy200+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peedee
I am considering an E92 M3 at the mo, always liked the look of them. They seem to vary drastically in price for some reason though?
There is so much variation, pre lci/lci/competition pack/edition cars/le500, dct /manual

Whatever you go for id be getting the newest I could afford and with a warranty, cheapest are the 2008 manuals
Old 23 January 2016, 11:22 PM
  #6  
bighead
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bighead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I have a E90 M3 , but I find that my P1 is faster , but it is running 500 bhp though

oh just to add my 2p worth.... M3 is so easy to drive it get boring at times , where's the P1 is much more engaging to drive and has bags more character !

Last edited by bighead; 23 January 2016 at 11:24 PM.
Old 23 January 2016, 11:42 PM
  #7  
cover99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
cover99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Chris - M3 is quick in fact you are usually going much faster than you realise in a short space of time, DCT is very slick and V8 with exhaust mod is probably the best sounding car, even over the Impreza with a Meercat system and Focus 5 pot with a Milltek system.

Peedee - The Focus RS is a difficult one to answer, I traded in my widetrack with only 20k miles. It was running ECUTEK with 350/350 and was immaculate. The focus which I had from new certainly ticked the boxes for appearance but felt really slow and heavy as standard and even at Revo stage 2 it felt slower than the Subaru, it spent most of its time in the garage pampered and the front grill had to be powdercoated twice as it was rusting. I felt when I as underneath it doing any maintenance it was all a bit lightweight compared to the Subaru and boy did it like to rust underneath, only yearly application of waxoil kept this at bay. However there are many other people who love the Focus so this is only my opinion when compared to my old Scooby.

Bighead - I also find the M3 can be very sedate and very comfortable however it does have quite a jeckle and hyde character and commands a bit more respect than any other car I have owned. I guess this contrast in personality can be a good thing.

I would only plan the STI to be back at around 350/350 and I find this stage of tune difficult to assess compared to the M3... Its been along time since I had the car which I must say I have always regretted selling but not sure if I would regret going from the M3 back to one, but it is very tempting.

Thanks for the replies.
Old 24 January 2016, 02:11 PM
  #8  
arthur.d
Scooby Regular
 
arthur.d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: fife scotland
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default sti

as a cruiser the m3 is hard to beat-however a ncely modded sti with decent prog springs,bigger power 400 ish bhp,quiet exhaust,nice sd map [smoother] is a good open road car,with fantastic cornering potential and a match for the m3 in the mid range and top end[which is where the m3 normally walks away from the standard sti]
sti is a more involving car to drive,and when its wet there is no contest
you can replace/forge the bottom end on an sti with some diy for the price of a decent service on the bimmer too....
Old 24 January 2016, 05:19 PM
  #9  
big_rob_sydney
Scooby Regular
 
big_rob_sydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just to try and give you a different view, I had a Lexus LS430 parked next to my lightly modded 22B (around 340bhp).

If I wanted a comfortable drive, I took the LS, if I wanted a blat, I took the subaru.

What kind of driving do you intend on doing most of? Because at the end of the day, you could modify either of them, to be able to do almost whatever you wanted, budget permitting.

Also, do you really care what other people think? I dont, but then I'm a selfish *****. I dont really give a rats *** if people think a subaru has an image problem (as seems to be quoted almost verbatim by, surprisingly, superficial people; go figure).

And finally, is the primary focus of the car what it can actually do dynamically? Because a subaru is a pretty well rounded performance car (badge snobs can just sit quietly in a corner, thanks), and with a few mods from a reputable tuner, is a very satisfying car to drive across a broad range of disciplines.

I personally find most cars like the M3/5 (and Lexus LS for that matter; bloody Japanese tank) to be quite heavy, and this just compromises their dynamic ability.

But that's only my opinion, and you know what people say about opinions.
Old 24 January 2016, 06:42 PM
  #10  
Not a Diesel!!!
Scooby Regular
 
Not a Diesel!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sussex
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know its not a M3 but I drive a 2010 plate 330i and my wife a Widetrack.


The 330i is easy to drive & comfortable and great fun revving the engine with a very slick manual gearbox but its an all-rounder. I would happily jump in it & drive 500 miles.


But the Widetrack is far more exciting in terms of power delivery, noise. You feel like you are concentrating much harder on driving.


You also know when your are going fast ( as does everyone else)
Old 24 January 2016, 06:44 PM
  #11  
Not a Diesel!!!
Scooby Regular
 
Not a Diesel!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sussex
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another consideration is the age & depreciation thing.


Most Widetracks are flat on £ if not creeping up.


The E90 M3 is most certainly still going down until people realise there are no more V8's any more.
Old 24 January 2016, 07:39 PM
  #12  
chrispy200+
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
chrispy200+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can't argue with depreciation, as for the widetrack being a more exciting drive I beg to differ, the v8 with the 8.2k rev limit and aftermarket or oem mod pipes like I ended up with after getting rid of my miltek exhaust is in a different league.

It's two cars, I had the m button set on s6, traction off and normal setting on the dampers, made for a very entertaining drive.
Then on normal it was s2, dampers on soft and MDM on.

The widetrack I have now is 435bhp, my type r before was 410/410. The Type R is the one I'd choose again over the two imprezas. Seating in the newage cars is too high for my liking
Old 24 January 2016, 10:58 PM
  #13  
cover99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
cover99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Guys thanks again for your opinions, I appreciate everyone's will be different just good to get a feel for peoples thoughts, car I have in mind is at top end cost wise for a blob eye therefore I know it wont be going up in value but I would agree it will probably loose less than the M3.

What is it like getting spares for the widetrack blobeye now? does Subaru still stock all parts?, I did notice it looks like all the prodrive accessories would appear to a no longer be available? Thanks again.
Old 25 January 2016, 09:01 AM
  #14  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I would say the M3 is more of a drivers car, in that you do actually need to be able to drive to go really quickly in one, where as with the newage subaru any old ham fisted mug can go quite quickly in one and still make it round the corner at the end of the straight bit, I'd be more inclined to compare the Type R to the M3 from a driving it really quickly perspective, just difficult to live with as a daily.

Ultimately it depends what sort of driving your doing predominately, I think you'd regret the swap to be honest, I don't think the newages are that engaging to drive and it's quite easy to reach the limits of what it's capable of without too much drama, rear wheel drive or bias is always going to equal more fun and more of a challenge, regardless of power.
Old 26 January 2016, 12:16 AM
  #15  
plenty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
plenty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 771
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispy200+
The widetrack I have now is 435bhp, my type r before was 410/410. The Type R is the one I'd choose again over the two imprezas. Seating in the newage cars is too high for my liking
More of an issue with widetrack cars. The non-widetrack blob and bugs have a lower driving position closer to that of a classic.
Old 26 January 2016, 03:34 AM
  #16  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plenty
More of an issue with widetrack cars. The non-widetrack blob and bugs have a lower driving position closer to that of a classic.
Still feels too high but then it is a saloon not some low slung coupe.

I see new m3s every day. I see a fellow Impreza driver about once a month.

Haven't been in neither car so cant make a choice
Old 26 January 2016, 03:34 PM
  #17  
chrispy200+
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
chrispy200+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plenty
More of an issue with widetrack cars. The non-widetrack blob and bugs have a lower driving position closer to that of a classic.
I've had both widetrack and older blobs now and I can see no difference between the two
Old 26 January 2016, 03:38 PM
  #18  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispy200+
I've had both widetrack and older blobs now and I can see no difference between the two
you cant say that!!!!

even if it is true lol, to 99% of us mear mortals it makes sod all difference. personally prefer the widetrack cos it has the hawk interior though.
Old 27 January 2016, 07:58 PM
  #19  
cover99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
cover99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Guys final question, What is the approximate major service costs on a widetrack if doing engine oil, filters, sparkplugs and rear diff oil/belts via a main Subaru dealer?.

Also are any spares becoming difficult to get hold of? Many Thanks
Old 27 January 2016, 08:10 PM
  #20  
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
 
south_scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: england
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
you cant say that!!!!

even if it is true lol, to 99% of us mear mortals it makes sod all difference. personally prefer the widetrack cos it has the hawk interior though.
We were discussing driving position
Old 27 January 2016, 11:16 PM
  #21  
chrispy200+
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
chrispy200+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Aldershot
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cover99
Guys final question, What is the approximate major service costs on a widetrack if doing engine oil, filters, sparkplugs and rear diff oil/belts via a main Subaru dealer?.

Also are any spares becoming difficult to get hold of? Many Thanks
Use a specialist rather than main dealer so cant help there but parts are not an issue, unless you count passenger airbag ignitors
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nortonscooby
ScoobyNet General
3
11 December 2015 12:41 PM
byrnsie44
ScoobyNet General
2
10 December 2015 04:50 PM
Dan-
Interior
1
04 December 2015 06:43 PM



Quick Reply: Widetrack STI vs E92 M3 Opinions



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 AM.