Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Ford Fiesta 1.4 TDCI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 March 2011, 11:01 AM
  #2  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Focus or Fiesta? I am liking the cut of your jib regarding the running costs (being a Gooner helps your case too).
Old 21 March 2011, 11:23 AM
  #3  
ScoobyWon't
Scooby Regular
 
ScoobyWon't's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The new Focus was released a couple of weeks ago - the VED on the new range has dropped to £20 on some models.

As I'm soon to be needing an estate, mainly for hauling around a big dog, I was looking at the Ford diesels, pretty much for the same reasons you mentioned - cheap to maintain, cheap parts etc.

There are some good deals out there on the Mk2 Focus, now the Mk3 is available, however, I noticed that the Mondeo was available for similar prices, although 1.6 and above rather than 1.4.

In my experience of using the Focus as a response car, they do pretty well and do take some hammering and don't fall apart unless they have been really abused. I've also got nothing but praise for the new Fiesta which I've been running since it was released to the market ob the 58 plates. Another solid car which has given me absolutely no problems and really does feel nice to drive (though it's a 1.6 petrol Zetec-S).
Old 21 March 2011, 11:27 AM
  #4  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Personally I found the 70ps 1.4 engine (same as found in 1.4HDi Pugs, Citroens and Mazdas) to be inadequate in anything except city driving.

Had a few as a hire car (as well as pug 207s with the same engine) and due to it doing mostly open road driving it was worse on fuel than the 1.6HDI engined Pugs/Focus/mazda 3s we usually had (all had the same engine and so had the same mpg) mainly due to having to work it harder through the gears.

So if its being used in city rush hour traffic and nothing else, it makes sense. But as soon as speeds get above 30mph its MPG is worse than the 1.6 version.

Rust should only effect the old pre 2002 chassis Fiestas which essentially dated back to 1990, and like its Escort/KA/Puma cousins (same chassis) terribly prone to rust.

The MK5 Chassis is a new design so should be better with the rust - put it this way you'll see plenty of structurally rotting pre MY2002 Fiestas but I'm yet to see a obviously rusty post 2002 cars (except from stone chip damage or from scraping opening doors over high curbs etc).

Although, I have to say the pre 2002 fiestas wouldn't rust anywhere near as badly if the owners washed the salt and muck off the sills and wheel arch lips every few weeks during winter, and caught any rust early by treating it and protecting it with the waxoyl (like I did on my 1992 Escort...it was rust free whilst many newer Escorts and Fiestas were total rot boxes).

Oh yes, they tend to snap coil springs (common thing on many modern cars these days). No big issue. Again, its mostly due to not washing the salt off within the wheelarches combined with potholed roads and bouncing up and down curbs .

Last edited by ALi-B; 21 March 2011 at 12:50 PM.
Old 21 March 2011, 12:05 PM
  #6  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Strange that, even though it said Focus, I read it as Fiesta because it said 1.4TDCi (dyslexia getting the better of me again)

edited
Old 24 March 2011, 01:45 PM
  #8  
^Qwerty^
Scooby Regular
 
^Qwerty^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Got a 55 plate - does the job and hasn't fallen to bits yet and doesn't appear to be either. MPG wise, it dropped to about 54mpg in winter, but is now creeping back up again. Tend to get about 60 in summer.
It's basic, it's not german (well it might be, but you know what I mean) but as a cheap car, I'd have one before a Clio and Corsa which I also looked at before handing over the dosh.
Old 24 March 2011, 02:40 PM
  #10  
alex_impreza
Scooby Regular
 
alex_impreza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im a new car sales executive at evans halshaw ford
the fiesta 1.4tdci's are really good for MPH and city driving also once upto speed are very good on a run, this is what i drive when im at work, highly recomend one for saving the monieessss
Old 24 March 2011, 02:41 PM
  #11  
alex_impreza
Scooby Regular
 
alex_impreza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that was meant to say MPG and tax not MPH
Old 25 March 2011, 10:46 AM
  #12  
^Qwerty^
Scooby Regular
 
^Qwerty^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alex_impreza
im a new car sales executive at evans halshaw ford
the fiesta 1.4tdci's are really good for MPH and city driving also once upto speed are very good on a run, this is what i drive when im at work, highly recomend one for saving the monieessss
Might be in the market for a new one soon, so could be in touch.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jobegold@hotmail.co.uk
ScoobyNet General
43
24 September 2015 02:16 PM
drsrst2zvh
ScoobyNet General
7
23 September 2015 07:37 PM
Saym
Was it you?
2
22 September 2015 10:18 AM
BladeRnnr
ScoobyNet General
1
15 September 2000 10:35 AM
MarkO
ScoobyNet General
19
10 February 2000 05:01 PM



Quick Reply: Ford Fiesta 1.4 TDCI



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 PM.