Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

horrendous fuel consumption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 November 2010, 05:38 PM
  #1  
trio
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default horrendous fuel consumption

Hi ive just bought a nissan vanette, on an 02 plate, i drive 120-140 miles a day to work and back. Since buying the van ive put £100 of deisel in it, and done 500 miles, this equates to roughly 25mpg, its not loaded full of gear and i sit a 70 on the motor way, 80%of the journey is motorway driving. the van does have a 2.3 engines but i was expecting slightly better fuel consumpion than this, am i being unresonable to expect 40-50 mpg, anyone got any ideas on why it s so bad?

Thanks Tristan
Old 24 November 2010, 05:44 PM
  #2  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The reason it's so bad is because......... it's a Nissan Vanette.
Old 24 November 2010, 06:03 PM
  #3  
trio
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

maybe, but that still doesnt explain why its as bad on fuel as my 350bhp type-r
Old 24 November 2010, 06:12 PM
  #4  
fatscoobfella1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
fatscoobfella1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,455
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

****ty designed diesel engine,weighty and aerodynamics of an Accrington brick..

Try dropping your speed to 60 mph on the motorway and see your MPG go up!
Old 24 November 2010, 06:17 PM
  #5  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Aren't those things flat out at 80mph? So 70 mph is really pushing it.

I think the main problem is its normally aspirated (diesels like lots of air) and has indirect injection (nearly everything is direct injection these days) and its probably not really geared for motorway use either. Reliable, yes, but performance and economy aren't at the top of the agenda (Toyota vans from the same era are the same).

Bit like my old works non-turbo Berlingo: 20 seconds to 60mph and 85mph max with a tailwind. Consequentally it'd only do about 30mpg max on daily trips from the Midlands to Watford at 70mph, which for a small van is terrible. But if I stuck to 50mph it would do over 45mpg! I hated that van it nearly drive me insane with slow-lane boredom.

Old shape 1990's Transits used to be the same, boy did they guzzle diesel if taken above 50mph.

Last edited by ALi-B; 24 November 2010 at 06:57 PM.
Old 24 November 2010, 06:23 PM
  #6  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Yup: This is the specs for the people carrier version of the same van: http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/specs/...px?deriv=12090

0-60mph in 26.9 seconds. And 30mpg

Last edited by ALi-B; 24 November 2010 at 06:27 PM.
Old 24 November 2010, 06:30 PM
  #7  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Cant base you expectations on new Diesel superminis with modern engines, just be glad it isnt a petrol !
Old 24 November 2010, 06:56 PM
  #8  
robby
Scooby Regular
 
robby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,127
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i drive a new Sprinter LWB at work, doing 150-160 miles a day on A and B roads (not hanging about) i use on average £32 a day in fuel
This isn't exactly loaded but at times can have maybe 1T for an hour or so
Old 24 November 2010, 07:20 PM
  #9  
stilover
Scooby Regular
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trio
Hi ive just bought a nissan vanette, on an 02 plate, i drive 120-140 miles a day to work and back. Since buying the van ive put £100 of deisel in it, and done 500 miles, this equates to roughly 25mpg,
That ain't good. Not good at all.

I get more than that out of Nissans 3.7 V6.
Old 24 November 2010, 07:22 PM
  #10  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I think we got more out of a 1.6 petrol luton boxed transit circa '93
Old 24 November 2010, 09:55 PM
  #11  
BOB.T
Scooby Senior
 
BOB.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Radiator Springs
Posts: 14,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by trio
am i being unresonable to expect 40-50 mpg

Yes
Old 24 November 2010, 10:31 PM
  #12  
alanbell
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
alanbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 6,824
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ive a transit 140 bhp with remap to 200bhp averages 30 mpg ,
Old 24 November 2010, 11:27 PM
  #13  
Jimpreza
Scooby Regular
 
Jimpreza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 2009 vauxhall vivaro diesel 115bhp and get 35 mpg
Old 24 November 2010, 11:30 PM
  #14  
gallois
Scooby Regular
 
gallois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i used to have a 2.4 diesel hilux-surf auto, used to get about 24mpg.
Old 25 November 2010, 11:10 AM
  #15  
Andy M3
Scooby Regular
 
Andy M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fatscoobfella1
****ty designed diesel engine,weighty and aerodynamics of an Accrington brick..

Try dropping your speed to 60 mph on the motorway and see your MPG go up!
or slightly less - avoid full throttle and braking
Old 25 November 2010, 11:26 AM
  #16  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

and tuck in behind an Arctic -- (the addded tension keeps the boredom at bay too)
Old 25 November 2010, 12:16 PM
  #17  
Reffro
Scooby Regular
 
Reffro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bushey
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry fella, but I have to agree with everything above. The Vanette is a pup, the engine is so wholly underpowered and of such ancient design that you have to thrash it to maintain progress and consequently destroy any chance of decent fuel economy. Just be thankful you don't have one with the original 2.0d NA engine. When on sale new as the Serena (The car from which it was derived), it was the UK's least accelerative car, 0-60mph in 32secs!!

Slowing down is all you can do in this instance to get back some semblance of economy, but it will never be above 36mpg on the motorway, even if driven by a nun. The official Combined Average MPG for the Serena 2.3d is 29.3mpg, so the 25mpg you quote is on the mark I would say.
Old 25 November 2010, 03:10 PM
  #18  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
and tuck in behind an Arctic -- (the addded tension keeps the boredom at bay too)
Our Seat sees a 5mpg improvement just by tailgating a HGV. With the cruise control set, MPG drops as soon as I move into an empty an lane. Pity they are restricted to 56mph. (Although in the Vanette's case than might be advantageous - as it can keep up without thrashing it ).

Boredom can also be relieved by hunting for a Merc Sprinter or VW Crafter Hi-top crusing at a higher constant speed (without a fast-brake-fast-brake-fast-brake driver) and try to tailgate that instead

Last edited by ALi-B; 25 November 2010 at 03:14 PM.
Old 25 November 2010, 05:28 PM
  #19  
trio
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the replys, maybe i should have looked into these before i went and paid cash for one, i never expected it to be so bad on fuel, i might put a tow bar on the type-r and buy a trailer and see better fuel economy for a works vehicle, and leave the vanette for the weekends

Thanks Trio
Old 25 November 2010, 06:32 PM
  #20  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
Boredom can also be relieved by hunting for a Merc Sprinter or VW Crafter Hi-top crusing at a higher constant speed (without a fast-brake-fast-brake-fast-brake driver) and try to tailgate that instead
agreed a well and smoothly driven Merc Sprinter is the holy grail -- but about as rare a Unicorn **** - sadly

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 25 November 2010 at 06:33 PM.
Old 25 November 2010, 08:59 PM
  #21  
robby
Scooby Regular
 
robby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,127
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
agreed a well and smoothly driven Merc Sprinter is the holy grail -- but about as rare a Unicorn **** - sadly
Hmm - that's why i've always got someone sniffing my rear doors
Old 25 November 2010, 09:53 PM
  #22  
alanbell
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
alanbell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 6,824
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ive got 3 sprinters 2 04 plates 1 05 plate all 311 ,s and 1 transit the transit is the fastest
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
09 March 2019 07:35 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM



Quick Reply: horrendous fuel consumption



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 PM.