Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Audi TTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 October 2009, 10:23 PM
  #1  
Jimpreza
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jimpreza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Audi TTS

Saw one of these today and it looked lovely. What are peoples views on these 270bhp with 4wd. I wouldn't want to look like a hairdresser.
Old 24 October 2009, 10:32 PM
  #2  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Price and performance would be my biggest issues rather than image. It is expensive and slow.

Last edited by john banks; 24 October 2009 at 10:33 PM.
Old 24 October 2009, 10:53 PM
  #3  
Jimpreza
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jimpreza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

0-62 in 5.4 seconds and limited to 155mph isn't exactly slow. I wouldn't buy one new but a second hand one maybe. I quite like the focus rs and Astra VXR but love 4wd grip and don't really want to get another Impreza.
Old 24 October 2009, 11:16 PM
  #4  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There aren't any second hand at sensible prices, and there weren't when I was shopping either, sensible spec on a new one ends up at £40k. When I was shopping for a car in this range, I wouldn't consider something so slow.
Old 24 October 2009, 11:19 PM
  #5  
nik52wrx
Scooby Regular
 
nik52wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some people talk out of thier backsides.
5.4s 0-60 time isn't slow What's quick in your opinion, 3.4?
Decent looking motors imo.
Nik.
Old 24 October 2009, 11:32 PM
  #6  
Volks
Scooby Regular
 
Volks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
There aren't any second hand at sensible prices, and there weren't when I was shopping either
If they`re so slow, why were you shopping for one in the first place?
Old 24 October 2009, 11:38 PM
  #7  
nik52wrx
Scooby Regular
 
nik52wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1

Originally Posted by Volks
If they`re so slow, why were you shopping for one in the first place?
Old 25 October 2009, 08:18 AM
  #8  
MattW
Scooby Regular
 
MattW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Same setup as an S3 with at least a 10k price premium. Nice car but far too expensive IMO. Even the RS specced up is over 50k, madness.
Old 25 October 2009, 10:14 AM
  #9  
richs2891
Scooby Regular
 
richs2891's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have to say I like them - as MattW has pointed out that its the same setup up as my current S3 so I know that Audi figures will be conservative, and with a stage 1 Revo even better, So lol at the comments of been slow - but they are deceptively smooth & quitewhich can hide the sensation of speed!
Lease cost for them seem to have dropped so might be getting a cab in Jan.

Matt- has your S4 arrived yet ? What options did you spec interior wise - sat in a V well specced S4 at the dealers and all I can say is wow !

Richard

Last edited by richs2891; 25 October 2009 at 10:17 AM. Reason: forgot
Old 25 October 2009, 10:50 AM
  #10  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I still maintain they are slow. Many people on here started as Impreza Turbo owners, and 0-60 in 5.2 was 10 years ago.

The TT in all forms has always been about show rather than go. I wish it was different as I like the mini-R8 look, but that is slow and overpriced too. As is the TT-RS, although that is more interesting, but even more expensive than the TTS.

Instead of the TT, how about a 997 or a 996 turbo, M3, GTR, Noble, Lotus, anything that has some element of an excellent engine, steering, suspension. There are much more interesting options in the £30-60k range.

Quick is certanily not 0-100 in 12 seconds...

To throw away c.£40k on a slow four cylinder that has nothing excellent about it is ill advised, there is a whole world of proper performance cars out there for that money that give real performance. Any TT is a mobile chicane on track in the way of one of these.

Last edited by john banks; 25 October 2009 at 11:00 AM.
Old 25 October 2009, 12:35 PM
  #11  
Timwinner
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Timwinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: www.Surreyscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The were voted gay car of the year not so long ago, And thats about all I can think of when I see someone driving one.
I have no problem with gay people obviously but gay cars make me laugh
Audi TT - TT tops the gay vote | GoAuto
Old 25 October 2009, 01:27 PM
  #12  
richs2891
Scooby Regular
 
richs2891's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
I still maintain they are slow. Many people on here started as Impreza Turbo owners, and 0-60 in 5.2 was 10 years ago.

The TT in all forms has always been about show rather than go. I wish it was different as I like the mini-R8 look, but that is slow and overpriced too. As is the TT-RS, although that is more interesting, but even more expensive than the TTS.

Instead of the TT, how about a 997 or a 996 turbo, M3, GTR, Noble, Lotus, anything that has some element of an excellent engine, steering, suspension. There are much more interesting options in the £30-60k range.

Quick is certanily not 0-100 in 12 seconds...

To throw away c.£40k on a slow four cylinder that has nothing excellent about it is ill advised, there is a whole world of proper performance cars out there for that money that give real performance. Any TT is a mobile chicane on track in the way of one of these.
Some interesting choices there, M3 - just not a fan would not consider.
But its the usual argument of used V new. And where does track (work ?) come into it ?
As stated I'm leasing the car so until find a leasing company that leases used cars, my choices are a bit more limited !

PS I have more fun at the moment in my off roader than road cars !

Richard
Old 25 October 2009, 02:21 PM
  #13  
PovK1
Scooby Regular
 
PovK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

35k will get a second hand new shape m3.

2.5 grands worth of mods will bump a TT-s power up to 360hp though.
Old 25 October 2009, 03:28 PM
  #14  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Leasing does I'm sure give a different situation, restricting choice, modification, if on behalf of an employer some limit performance/seats/CO2 and other dull but practical considerations, but if they're paying I guess they can.

360 BHP in a TT-S will still be monumentally dull IMHO for the money it costs. If you bought a new one, specced it up and paid list, did your 360 BHP mods, you're within a few grand of a lightly used GTR which with £750 of tuning gives about 570 BHP, 0-60 and 0-100 under 3 and 7 seconds. That puts it into perspective for me. What is the point of an expensive 2 door coupe that is so slow when other options like that are around for not much more? I know I'm stretching the new vs used slightly, but the TT just doesn't do it for me. If the TTRS was priced like the TTS, then perhaps.

Yes, S3 I can entirely see the point, it is a sensible/smart looking car with a nice interior, it is economical, refined, reasonably priced, you can park it almost anywhere, and it has reasonable performance for its price.
Old 25 October 2009, 10:30 PM
  #15  
AlanPPP
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
AlanPPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wirral,Pensby
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Take a look at last months EVO magazine mate..good write up in there.

Oh and there far from slow! Although i'm not sure were talking about the same model?!
Old 25 October 2009, 10:57 PM
  #16  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

On their website they've recently reviewed a TTRS and it still takes 13 sec to do a quarter mile and costs £50k with options. It too is a pointless bauble, not a £50k performance car.

It takes most people a while to save up £50k with all the taxes and cost of living these days, or a big whack out of their monthly income if they have to pay to PCP/hire it/finance it, they don't want to be bored when they blow it on a car.

Last edited by john banks; 25 October 2009 at 11:03 PM.
Old 25 October 2009, 11:18 PM
  #17  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think they are sports cars for those that arent interested in the ultimate drive, it looks nice, has a nice interior and goes plenty fast enough for most with the bonus on not eating its own gearbox every six months. For some boring (as boring as a 260 bhp car can be) as what is exciting to you is actually scary for them.

A GTR is too much car for most people, not in to drive it normally as I cant imagine its difficult but in terms of sheer performance and the attention it attracts, never mind the bills.
Old 26 October 2009, 08:28 AM
  #18  
MattW
Scooby Regular
 
MattW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like the price is the problem not the performance.


Originally Posted by rsarjantson
Matt- has your S4 arrived yet ? What options did you spec interior wise - sat in a V well specced S4 at the dealers and all I can say is wow !

Richard
Richard spec as follows, it's currently being built, was at checkpoint 3 on Friday, so hopefully another 2-3 weeks.

I guess the showroom car had the supersport seats, I quite like the standard ones (like the S3) so so have kept them.

Avant
S tronic
Sepang Blue Exclusive Colour
Black Milano Leather
Hill Hold
19" Alloys (RS4 Style)
Heated folding mirrors
Privacy
High Beam Assist headlights
Adaptive headlights
Ski load through
Tyre pressure monitor
Heated front and rear seats
Drive Select (Full)
Sports diff
Advanced key
Rear side airbags
Phone prep low
B&O sounds
DAB
Tech Pack (Sat Nav, AMI, Cruise)
Park System Plus
Old 26 October 2009, 09:36 AM
  #19  
richs2891
Scooby Regular
 
richs2891's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice sensible spec -fat to easy to go silly on the spec - when a lot of the stuff can be retrofitted for very little money.
yes the seats where the super sports one - better than the buckets I have in my S3 at the moment !

Have fun when it arrives

Richard
Old 27 October 2009, 12:46 AM
  #20  
PovK1
Scooby Regular
 
PovK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
Leasing does I'm sure give a different situation, restricting choice, modification, if on behalf of an employer some limit performance/seats/CO2 and other dull but practical considerations, but if they're paying I guess they can.

360 BHP in a TT-S will still be monumentally dull IMHO for the money it costs. If you bought a new one, specced it up and paid list, did your 360 BHP mods, you're within a few grand of a lightly used GTR which with £750 of tuning gives about 570 BHP, 0-60 and 0-100 under 3 and 7 seconds. That puts it into perspective for me. What is the point of an expensive 2 door coupe that is so slow when other options like that are around for not much more? I know I'm stretching the new vs used slightly, but the TT just doesn't do it for me. If the TTRS was priced like the TTS, then perhaps.

Yes, S3 I can entirely see the point, it is a sensible/smart looking car with a nice interior, it is economical, refined, reasonably priced, you can park it almost anywhere, and it has reasonable performance for its price.
I agree, it would be stupid to spend all that money on a brand new TTs. Wait till they are a year or two atleast for a bargain. Im waiting for the same to happen on the TT-RS.
Old 28 October 2009, 10:41 AM
  #21  
Jimpreza
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Jimpreza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do like the TTRS just way out of my price range. I am seriously going to look at a TTS when they hit the 25k mark. I don't know if it'll be ok for my daughter in the back though.
Old 28 October 2009, 02:45 PM
  #22  
Janspeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Janspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .........
Posts: 5,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Audi TTS 8J (2,0TFSI 200 kW (272hp) quattro) Tuning - MTM Product overview


Audi TTRS 8J (2,5TFSI 250 kW (340hp) quattro) Tuning - MTM Product overview
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Uncle Creepy
Other Marques
43
27 December 2015 04:02 PM
Justme103
Member's Gallery
16
13 December 2015 09:34 PM
fingerscooby
ScoobyNet General
4
26 September 2015 02:36 AM
wilki
Non Car Related Items For sale
0
17 September 2015 11:00 AM
AWD
ScoobyNet General
42
19 April 2001 10:40 AM



Quick Reply: Audi TTS



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM.