This Would Suit Me - Big, Brash, Brutish
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
This Would Suit Me - Big, Brash, Brutish
Sovereign Car Sales : Sport Cars for Sale
http://www.bickfordshelby.com/07imag...yGT500KR_7.jpg
Bloody good looking motors!
http://www.bickfordshelby.com/07imag...yGT500KR_7.jpg
Bloody good looking motors!
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bebind the wheel of my red rice rocket
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never been i fan myself.
It never ceases to amaze me how relatively few ponys the Americans can squeeze out of such big engine blocks.
I remember TG reviewing one of these and not being very impressed with it though they also had a an independent tuning house version there which was far better – had a LSD amongst other toys IIRC.
It never ceases to amaze me how relatively few ponys the Americans can squeeze out of such big engine blocks.
I remember TG reviewing one of these and not being very impressed with it though they also had a an independent tuning house version there which was far better – had a LSD amongst other toys IIRC.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sovereign Car Sales : Sport Cars for Sale
http://www.bickfordshelby.com/07imag...yGT500KR_7.jpg
Bloody good looking motors!
http://www.bickfordshelby.com/07imag...yGT500KR_7.jpg
Bloody good looking motors!
#7
Scooby Regular
Having said that I'm not a big fan of Mustangs* either, I'd take a Corvette or a Monaro over one every time
Shelby GT350s excepted, obviously
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The torque figures (given the cc) on US cars are nothing to write home about either.
They simply don't develop their engines and are WAY behind engines from Germany and Japan.
HOWEVER, there is a reason for this, they don't NEED to develop their engines as fuel costs aren't high (historically of course!)
2ndly, the US prefer long service intervals and high mileage so engines that are low stressed require less maintenance to last a long time.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bebind the wheel of my red rice rocket
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd understand if only this were true.
The torque figures (given the cc) on US cars are nothing to write home about either.
They simply don't develop their engines and are WAY behind engines from Germany and Japan.
HOWEVER, there is a reason for this, they don't NEED to develop their engines as fuel costs aren't high (historically of course!)
2ndly, the US prefer long service intervals and high mileage so engines that are low stressed require less maintenance to last a long time.
The torque figures (given the cc) on US cars are nothing to write home about either.
They simply don't develop their engines and are WAY behind engines from Germany and Japan.
HOWEVER, there is a reason for this, they don't NEED to develop their engines as fuel costs aren't high (historically of course!)
2ndly, the US prefer long service intervals and high mileage so engines that are low stressed require less maintenance to last a long time.
#11
They simply don't develop their engines and are WAY behind engines from Germany and Japan.
HOWEVER, there is a reason for this, they don't NEED to develop their engines as fuel costs aren't high (historically of course!)
2ndly, the US prefer long service intervals and high mileage so engines that are low stressed require less maintenance to last a long time.
HOWEVER, there is a reason for this, they don't NEED to develop their engines as fuel costs aren't high (historically of course!)
2ndly, the US prefer long service intervals and high mileage so engines that are low stressed require less maintenance to last a long time.
I don't see 7-year 100,000 mile warranties on vehicles sold over here, let alone lifetime powertrain warranties - horses for courses.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford have always been marginally behind on their engines. Their modular v8s have always underperformed unless in an extreme high tune state: But when they are in a high state of tune, they do perform. But they cheat like the Europeans and use forced induction
For example for a short time, the world's fastest production car was a Koeniggsesgggsesgg powered by a Ford 4.7 V8 - albeit supercharged to 800bhp.
GM motors currently uses more advanced metallurgy in their GenIV engines on par and in some cases surpassing Jap an EU manufacturers. The advanced castings, and pistons (more advanced than Subaru's...they don't melt! ), rods and cylinder head designs has resulted in a series of engines using a very basic valvetrain having huge cylinder capacities and yet providing very wide and flexible powerbands that revs up to 7000rpm, but still has lots of torque at 1500rpm. Yet a turn key engine assembly weighs less than a comparable Rover V8 which is half the capacity, produces typically a third of the power ( ), and is by far less fuel efficient.
Not to mention respectable peak figures for any normally aspirated engine without the need for complex valvetrains.
However, when supercharged, power figuers further improve - massively, as these engines often can run a aftermarket supercharger without needing to reduce the compression ratios (reducing off boost power and economy- i.e scooby-ville). That's having a cake AND eating
For example for a short time, the world's fastest production car was a Koeniggsesgggsesgg powered by a Ford 4.7 V8 - albeit supercharged to 800bhp.
GM motors currently uses more advanced metallurgy in their GenIV engines on par and in some cases surpassing Jap an EU manufacturers. The advanced castings, and pistons (more advanced than Subaru's...they don't melt! ), rods and cylinder head designs has resulted in a series of engines using a very basic valvetrain having huge cylinder capacities and yet providing very wide and flexible powerbands that revs up to 7000rpm, but still has lots of torque at 1500rpm. Yet a turn key engine assembly weighs less than a comparable Rover V8 which is half the capacity, produces typically a third of the power ( ), and is by far less fuel efficient.
Not to mention respectable peak figures for any normally aspirated engine without the need for complex valvetrains.
However, when supercharged, power figuers further improve - massively, as these engines often can run a aftermarket supercharger without needing to reduce the compression ratios (reducing off boost power and economy- i.e scooby-ville). That's having a cake AND eating
Last edited by Shark Man; 19 December 2007 at 10:44 AM.
#14
Certainly one of the best looking cars ever created (imo).
Though I've heard the Shelby version isn't all it's cracked up to be. Apparently the suspension is just rubbish and results in terrible handling.
The Roush, on the other hand, has uprated fitted and apparently benefits massively from it. Although it is quite a lot more expensive.
Either way, it's still one of the coolest cars on the road and I'd love to have one.
Though I've heard the Shelby version isn't all it's cracked up to be. Apparently the suspension is just rubbish and results in terrible handling.
The Roush, on the other hand, has uprated fitted and apparently benefits massively from it. Although it is quite a lot more expensive.
Either way, it's still one of the coolest cars on the road and I'd love to have one.
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Deepest Darkest Dorset!!
Posts: 10,011
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I did some research into getting a Mustang after a recent trip to the states, it is possible to have them converted to RHD, but reckon on about 5k for it..... or, you can buy kits, i could have bought 2 kits, for about 2.5k, the initial idea was to import two cars ina container, convert the first, sell it, then convert the second, and keep it.... the idea being that the first car would at least pay for the cost of the kits and the time to convert the second...
Never did it though, i decided that the Mustang was just too big for the roads around where it would be used......!
Never did it though, i decided that the Mustang was just too big for the roads around where it would be used......!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
MightyArsenal
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
6
25 September 2015 08:31 PM