E39 M5 to CSL
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E39 M5 to CSL
Got the urge for trackdays again, and while the M5 performed admirably at Bedford, it needs 3k spent at least on AP's, bushes and rear ARB and even then you can't hide it's girth on tighter tracks.
Considering swapping out for a CSL. Some see it is an expensive M3, I see it as a cheap GT3. Always loved the looks and the sound, and the performance is likened by many to the GT3 (in fact on many tracks its actually faster) plus the SMG is useful for me when I'm driving in central london and because I have mild RSI.
Thoughts on the move? Already over on the M forum, but keen to get some non-BMW opinions to balance the 'converted'.
Ed
Considering swapping out for a CSL. Some see it is an expensive M3, I see it as a cheap GT3. Always loved the looks and the sound, and the performance is likened by many to the GT3 (in fact on many tracks its actually faster) plus the SMG is useful for me when I'm driving in central london and because I have mild RSI.
Thoughts on the move? Already over on the M forum, but keen to get some non-BMW opinions to balance the 'converted'.
Ed
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London(ish)
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah go on, get an even more exclusive Beemer, then you can get spat on by jealous chavs even more and cut up by white vans in trafffic
Got the urge for trackdays again, and while the M5 performed admirably at Bedford, it needs 3k spent at least on AP's, bushes and rear ARB and even then you can't hide it's girth on tighter tracks.
Considering swapping out for a CSL. Some see it is an expensive M3, I see it as a cheap GT3. Always loved the looks and the sound, and the performance is likened by many to the GT3 (in fact on many tracks its actually faster) plus the SMG is useful for me when I'm driving in central london and because I have mild RSI.
Thoughts on the move? Already over on the M forum, but keen to get some non-BMW opinions to balance the 'converted'.
Ed
Considering swapping out for a CSL. Some see it is an expensive M3, I see it as a cheap GT3. Always loved the looks and the sound, and the performance is likened by many to the GT3 (in fact on many tracks its actually faster) plus the SMG is useful for me when I'm driving in central london and because I have mild RSI.
Thoughts on the move? Already over on the M forum, but keen to get some non-BMW opinions to balance the 'converted'.
Ed
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of the CSL owners I know have also spent good money on brake upgrades.
It seems only one manufacturer produces cars with good brakes nowadays!
It seems only one manufacturer produces cars with good brakes nowadays!
#5
Porcshe but also higher spec Mercs, and Ferrari's ar'nt too bad surely
Edcase, If the CSL brakes are the same as the M3 brakes which i'm pretty certain they are. You will need to change them also I suppose the CSL has weight on its side but its not going to make that much difference. Full AP kit front and rear cost me about £3200 on a group buy, well worth it though.
Scott
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Porcshe but also higher spec Mercs, and Ferrari's ar'nt too bad surely
Edcase, If the CSL brakes are the same as the M3 brakes which i'm pretty certain they are. You will need to change them also I suppose the CSL has weight on its side but its not going to make that much difference. Full AP kit front and rear cost me about £3200 on a group buy, well worth it though.
Scott
Edcase, If the CSL brakes are the same as the M3 brakes which i'm pretty certain they are. You will need to change them also I suppose the CSL has weight on its side but its not going to make that much difference. Full AP kit front and rear cost me about £3200 on a group buy, well worth it though.
Scott
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On mine, the only difference between it and the CSL is a change of pad material. However, the CSL has 345mm drilled discs, uprated pads and lines but having said that there are still plenty of people complaining about the braking performance on track days which is essentially what its built for. On the road, they are excellent stoppers.
#10
#12
you remember there were 2 white ones originally black but had been wrapped in white leaving out the carbon panels
the owners had spent £25000 on the suspension, which shaved 20seconds off the lap times
fantastic car, i think a cheap GT3, your right
although a GT3 RS got to be the ultimate track toy
there was an orange with black wheels 997 at oulton on friday trackday, 225miles on the clock that had been put on getting to oulton park
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chesterfield
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I watched this: YouTube - supercar battle 5
Apparently the 360CS brakes fade on a track
I guess anything that is 'road legal' is going to be a compromise when used on a track.
P.S The video compares the on track performance of a CSL, NSX-R, 360 CS, Lambo 996 Turbo tip etc etc.......
Apparently the 360CS brakes fade on a track
I guess anything that is 'road legal' is going to be a compromise when used on a track.
P.S The video compares the on track performance of a CSL, NSX-R, 360 CS, Lambo 996 Turbo tip etc etc.......
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys,
After meeting with some other CSL owners last night I had an epiphany.
I'm now canning the idea of a CSL, keeping the M5 as my road car, and looking for a specific track car.
Not decided yet on tin top vs catelisefieldtypething but this caught my eye today...
Vehicle Details
After meeting with some other CSL owners last night I had an epiphany.
I'm now canning the idea of a CSL, keeping the M5 as my road car, and looking for a specific track car.
Not decided yet on tin top vs catelisefieldtypething but this caught my eye today...
Vehicle Details
#18
As said above - If you have the luxury of keeping the M5 and getting a total track toy I would personally go the whole hogg and get a Westfield or Caterham. They are damn quick and would give the perception of a proper racing car as well superb handling and feedback. And its something you can get your hands dirty with and play with the mechanics if needs be.
#19
Spend 3 grand on a track car and save ruining your M5 !
3 grand on mods that will either detract from the cars value or not add anything to it seems a bit crazy, up to you but I would rather hammer something cheap and expendable rather than something I was worried about damaging.
3 grand on mods that will either detract from the cars value or not add anything to it seems a bit crazy, up to you but I would rather hammer something cheap and expendable rather than something I was worried about damaging.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A grand on an old M535i would sharpen the rwd control no end, massive fun on track.
Maybe consider a 944 Turbo as well, speak to Davyboy. Or an MX5, massive fun, never break, just kick the tyres once a year and put petrol in and it'll never let you down, but give you a massive smile whenever you drive its perfect chassis. You'd probably be surprised at how quick a sorted MX5 can lap a circuit.
Dedicated track cars eat money at a fair rate of knots, and towing is a right pain in the **** once the novelty wears off, so go for something road legal.
Converting to 'track' spec is also real expensive and you'll lose virtually all the cash you spend modding it. Also bear in mind the extra road tax / insurance / storage when its not in use if thats relevant.
HTH matey
ps really skint now
Maybe consider a 944 Turbo as well, speak to Davyboy. Or an MX5, massive fun, never break, just kick the tyres once a year and put petrol in and it'll never let you down, but give you a massive smile whenever you drive its perfect chassis. You'd probably be surprised at how quick a sorted MX5 can lap a circuit.
Dedicated track cars eat money at a fair rate of knots, and towing is a right pain in the **** once the novelty wears off, so go for something road legal.
Converting to 'track' spec is also real expensive and you'll lose virtually all the cash you spend modding it. Also bear in mind the extra road tax / insurance / storage when its not in use if thats relevant.
HTH matey
ps really skint now
#21
The CSL is an awesome bit of kit, quick and very sure footed. Our good friend Thorleif doing his stuff in his white one
:: northloop.co.uk :: we're not playing games ::
:: northloop.co.uk :: we're not playing games ::
#23
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: W Sussex
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ed, what you need is a caterfield and then an RS6 to tow it with
Only joking, but a caterfied takes some beating as a track car and if you buy sensibly will make a fun weekend road toy as well.
Only joking, but a caterfied takes some beating as a track car and if you buy sensibly will make a fun weekend road toy as well.
#25
Ed - There is a E30 325I sport with a M30 335I lump in it on Pistonheads for 4.5K - Was very tempted with this myself but thought better of it. A lot of RWD track car for the moneny. Would make for a fantastic track car with loads of torque and instance power delivery.
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, update as follows.
I was having oil consumption probs with the M5, and after testing BMW agree it is well out of tolerance and are fitting me a spanking new engine to replace my 93k mile one.
As such, I'm now definitely keeping the car, I have a set of 6 pots on order simply because the brakes aren't even up to fast road use, and I'm going to get a new clutch and flywheel done at the same time to save labour costs as the clutch is nearly worn anyway.
And then as soon as we move out of central London to Surrey (likely early March) I'm going to get a caterfield, or maybe a modified Elise. Give's me a month or so to read up on the three options.
Thanks for all your advice etc.
I was having oil consumption probs with the M5, and after testing BMW agree it is well out of tolerance and are fitting me a spanking new engine to replace my 93k mile one.
As such, I'm now definitely keeping the car, I have a set of 6 pots on order simply because the brakes aren't even up to fast road use, and I'm going to get a new clutch and flywheel done at the same time to save labour costs as the clutch is nearly worn anyway.
And then as soon as we move out of central London to Surrey (likely early March) I'm going to get a caterfield, or maybe a modified Elise. Give's me a month or so to read up on the three options.
Thanks for all your advice etc.
#27
New M5 engine courtesy of BMW NICE! - Hate to imagine what that might have cost if you had to do it yourself i.e without a warranty which I assume you had. Made me think twice about getting a M5 now. Thought they were bullet proof.
#28
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it would have cost more than I paid for the car.
engine issues are very very rare on this motor, but the very early ones sometime suffer from soft valve seats which cause the oil consumption issue.
I believe this was rectified from some time in 2001 onwards.
engine issues are very very rare on this motor, but the very early ones sometime suffer from soft valve seats which cause the oil consumption issue.
I believe this was rectified from some time in 2001 onwards.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How the hell did you manage to get a new engine out of them? I'm struggling to get them interested in the fact that mine pulls to the left.