TT3.2
16 November 2006, 10:42 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mm20515
My sister got a new TT 3.2 and i took it for a burn, sorry a drive serious exhaust note from it but My ppp would gobble it
17 November 2006, 12:43 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mm20515
My sister got a new TT 3.2 and i took it for a burn, sorry a drive serious exhaust note from it but My ppp would gobble it
17 November 2006, 02:20 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tobisausage
My sister has a new Audi TT 3.2 and I took it for a 'burn', sorry I mean a 'drive' (hahahahaha). The car has a serious sounding exhaust note but my PPP would 'Gobble it' (out perform it).
You probably just underestimated the linear power delivery - *feels* slower than a turbo'd car.
17 November 2006, 02:27 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spectrum48k
I doubt a scooby with PPP would "Gobble it" - given it has 250 BHP and the same weight as a MY00, not to mention a slippery shape which helps it at higher speeds, compared to your breeze-block shaped car.
You probably just underestimated the linear power delivery - *feels* slower than a turbo'd car.
You probably just underestimated the linear power delivery - *feels* slower than a turbo'd car.
Trending Topics
18 November 2006, 03:00 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gt Dunmow Essex
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Completely ridiculous! Can everyone just get off there pathetic high horses in regard to spelling and punctuation. It really is not that big a deal as long as you get the gist, i understood it alright. Slate him for making a twatish comment if you think that it's the case. Seriously, get over yourselves!
18 November 2006, 03:15 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by spectrum48k
I doubt a scooby with PPP would "Gobble it" - given it has 250 BHP and the same weight as a MY00, not to mention a slippery shape which helps it at higher speeds, compared to your breeze-block shaped car.
You probably just underestimated the linear power delivery - *feels* slower than a turbo'd car.
You probably just underestimated the linear power delivery - *feels* slower than a turbo'd car.
18 November 2006, 07:01 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CT_dunmow
Completely ridiculous! Can everyone just get off there pathetic high horses in regard to spelling and punctuation. It really is not that big a deal as long as you get the gist, i understood it alright. Slate him for making a twatish comment if you think that it's the case. Seriously, get over yourselves!
19 November 2006, 11:28 AM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Luan Pra bang
They are very slow though TT's, A friends girlfrined had one with a couple of grand spent on the engine and 350 bhp but it was no faster than my scoob with 280 bhp.
So a TT with 70 bhp more than your Scoob was no faster?
Very unlikely
19 November 2006, 12:56 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AudiLover
your not making much sense. A chipped 2.0T with a new exhaust would probably put it on par with your scooby though.
Mk2 is a 2.0T or 3.2.
Mk2 official figures are:
200PS 2.0-litre Turbo FSI petrol engine and front-wheel-drive
250PS 3.2-litre V6 with quattro permanent four-wheel-drive
2.0 TFSI S tronic 0-62mph in 6.5 seconds, top speed 147mph, 36.2mpg
3.2 quattro S tronic 0-62mph in 5.9 seconds, top speed limited to 155mph, 29.7mpg
I had a 225TT that was around 290bhp after some serious money spent on it.
It was about the same performance as my WRX, maybe a little quicker, but my WRX with PPP is certainly quicker.
But that's not what it's all about with the TT, it's build quality, interior design, comfort etc.
remapping the smaller engines gives about 40bhp more and alot more useable power as the torque is far better too.
Great cars, but peformance wise, not on a par with subaru.
Originally Posted by Luan Pra bang
They are very slow though TT's, A friends girlfrined had one with a couple of grand spent on the engine and 350 bhp but it was no faster than my scoob with 280 bhp.
Last edited by leerjwd; 19 November 2006 at 01:00 PM.
19 November 2006, 02:28 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well from what Ive read on the german audi forums the new TT being lighter, and having a more tuneable 2.0T FSI, its easy to get big power out of it with 300hp not being a hard task at all so I could see it being on par with a wrx in a roll on race due to it being fwd.
Last edited by AudiLover; 19 November 2006 at 02:30 PM.
19 November 2006, 08:25 PM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by leerjwd
They are 1.
And that's crap! You need to spend serious money to get 350bhp, I mean SERIOUS - upward of 6k, it needs a new turbo and a strengthened bottom end. There are maybe one or two on the TT forum that have that sort of power. Not a couple of grand. New turbo, decat, full exhaust, fmic, custom remap.......
And that's crap! You need to spend serious money to get 350bhp, I mean SERIOUS - upward of 6k, it needs a new turbo and a strengthened bottom end. There are maybe one or two on the TT forum that have that sort of power. Not a couple of grand. New turbo, decat, full exhaust, fmic, custom remap.......
20 November 2006, 11:09 AM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Luan Pra bang
Now get a grip and don't accuse me of talking crap. The car belonged to a friend who had one rebuild done already and the engine went pop. The same company then carried out a further rebuild and did extra work and only charged a little extra they had to work on the engine anyway under warranty and they wanted to keep the car dealer owner of the car happy.
20 November 2006, 08:34 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CT_dunmow
Completely ridiculous! Can everyone just get off there pathetic high horses in regard to spelling and punctuation. It really is not that big a deal as long as you get the gist, i understood it alright. Slate him for making a twatish comment if you think that it's the case. Seriously, get over yourselves!
21 November 2006, 10:02 PM
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy M3
2 different cars to compare with. I would like to see it vs. the BMW Z4 coupe 3.0 which I think is a much prettier car.
Any pics of the TT?
Any pics of the TT?
]TT Forum :: View topic - My TT (Thought it about time) - 56k warning
well, was mine...
Oddly I did overtake a z4 3l trying it's might, (gritted teeth the lot), but that was in my remapped TT, not standard, which it would have certainly have left standing.
I think the mk2 TT will turn out to be a quicker tuned car in the long run, but not in standard form.
To get 350bhp from them (and certainly the old one) is going to take more thana few Łk
Last edited by leerjwd; 21 November 2006 at 10:04 PM.
