Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Turbocharged MG BGT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 October 2003, 01:42 PM
  #1  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

A mate of mine is restoring an old MG BGT. He's got a 1950cc overbored block, and we're wondering about the possibilities of turbocharging it. Apparently it's been done before (see here - with a TD05 blower, running circa 0.5 bar boost (estimated 174bhp).

The BGT uses a compression ratio of ~9.5:1, so we're considering dropping that a little by use of a thick 'spacer' gasket. This is to avoid expense of new rods. Hopefully the head studs are long enough (or cheap enough if the OEs are too short).

Now, if we're running a low boost pressure (say, 0.5 bar) could we get away without intercooling? Or, is this asking for trouble?

Current idea of parts list...

# Standard 1.75" SU Carb type inlet manifold
# Late type MGB exhaust manifold (modified with Adapter plate)
# 1.75" SU Carburettors (with uprated springs and different needles)
# Turbocharger
# Modified Exhaust downpipe with Turbo adapter plate
# Charge Pipe fabricated
# Boost Hose and Jubilee clips
# Cone type high-flow air filter
# Carburettor adapter plates (fabricated)
# Heat shield
# Exhaust insulating wrap
# Oil feed hoses
# Re-routed fuel lines
# Variable fuel pressure regulator
# Special, extra thick head gasket
# Boost gauge

What else might we have overlooked? Ideas and thoughts appreciated - even if it's "don't do it!", provided you can explain why.

[Edited by Fatman - 10/29/2003 1:57:31 PM]
Old 29 October 2003, 02:01 PM
  #2  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I haven't heeard of anyone doing it before, used to be a member of the MGOC and MGCC few years back when i had various Sprites.

Most peiople bung in a V8 rover lump. Much lighter and more powerful with huge tuning potential over the 1.8 lump. TBH the brakes and suspension would need work, std BGT set-up is not up to much. They are easy to do, many parts and kits avaliable at reasonable prices.

Has your mate thought about supercharging?

Try the MGOC site
http://www.mgcars.org.uk/cgi-bin/gen5?runprog=mgoc&p=index.html.
Old 29 October 2003, 02:07 PM
  #3  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

No, we've not considered supercharging thus far. We'll kick the idea around now, though .

Regarding the basic block, the start-point is the overbored 1800 (to 1950) lump. This was sold as a spare with the car (which has it's own stock 1800). The intention of the project is to do it without substantial outlay of cash.

If V8s are available for little money, then we'll consider it. However, so far - turbocharging the 1950cc seems the best value for money.
Old 29 October 2003, 02:16 PM
  #4  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Choice of turbo

Considering that we're not seeking epic levels of power, what factors should we consider ing choosing the turbo? Bear in mind we're not looking to invest much cash.

Would we be better off using a small turbo, or a larger one at lower pressure?
Old 29 October 2003, 02:36 PM
  #5  
Paulo P
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (42)
 
Paulo P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bucks
Posts: 23,797
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

You would be better off using a small turbo so that it spins up easier.

The big question about turbo charging an MG is WHY
Old 29 October 2003, 02:36 PM
  #6  
misty
Scooby Regular
 
misty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: astra 1.9ctdi with dtuk green box. 195/300
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

The old MG Metro turbo didn't have an intercooler! and it fed a single sealed S.U. If you found one at a scrappy, you could use that I bet!!
dave
Old 29 October 2003, 02:40 PM
  #7  
Paulo P
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (42)
 
Paulo P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bucks
Posts: 23,797
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

Good thought.
Old 29 October 2003, 02:41 PM
  #8  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The big question about turbo charging an MG is WHY
...why not?

It's his second MG. The first is being restored to factory spec - completely faithful and original. The second car is just a fun project.

I agree that a smaller turbo would spin up quicker. However for the same boost pressure, would a larger turbo not give a lower charge temperature? That would probably be desirable if we're running without an intercooler - wouldn't it? Or, am I worrying too much about preignition?
Old 29 October 2003, 03:20 PM
  #9  
Paulo P
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (42)
 
Paulo P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bucks
Posts: 23,797
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

Why aren't you planning to run an intercooler?
Old 29 October 2003, 04:26 PM
  #10  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Mainly due to lack of space. Plus, I'm hoping that with low boost pressures we won't actually need one.
Old 29 October 2003, 04:40 PM
  #11  
Scoob99
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Scoob99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Jaguar 3.0 sport now bought, Am loving it!!!!!
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

try www.moto-build.co.uk they might be able to help as they do all tuning for M.G.'s
Cheers
Colin
Old 30 October 2003, 09:47 AM
  #12  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What about the Maestro Turbo...?
  • Did they use carbs or fuel injection?
  • Did they use an intercooler?
Old 30 October 2003, 11:21 AM
  #13  
brickboy
Scooby Regular
 
brickboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

At the low boost pressures you're talking about it's unlikely you'd need an intercooler. At least the plumbing will be easy 'cos it's not a crossflow head

You'll need to plumb in an oil feed to the turbo but you could tap into the oil cooler feed pipe quite easily ...

Sounds like a laugh, go for it!
Old 30 October 2003, 06:15 PM
  #14  
misty
Scooby Regular
 
misty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: astra 1.9ctdi with dtuk green box. 195/300
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Fatmans right, my old montego turbo(ok no need to take the ****!!!)had an intercooler and fed a single 1 3/4 S.U. but the manifold is way different on the "O" series than the "B" series.
dave
Old 30 October 2003, 08:51 PM
  #15  
MGJohn
Scooby Regular
 
MGJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Some people have successfully fitted O series engines to the MGB. Those 'people' included several Abingdon project cars when the factory were considering replacing the then ageing B series motors with the O series for the MGB. That was back in the mid-1970s and MGB production ceased later so no further progress. However, the O series was switched to later Princesses, Ambassadoors, Maestros and Montegos as well as Leyland Daf vans and diesel applications too. Oh yes, even the humble Morris Ital 1700HL had an in-line O series. I had one of these as a company car back then and it could shift by those day's standards... Some of these in-line O series units have made their way into MGBs with pleasing results.

The 8 valve O series lends itself to successful turbocharging.... witness the Maestro and Montego turbos .... which all have O series engines. O series have extremely strong bottom ends so moderate or higher tuning is rarely a problem. 200 bhp or more reliably obtained by many enthusiasts. In it's mid-1970s 'strangulated for the USA emissions market' rubber bumper form, the MGB produced about half the BHP that my first MG, a 1962 3-bearing UK spec car did in 1962!

The M16 and later T16 Rover engines are virtually O series with DOHC 16 valve heads and turbo versions of these have been tuned to exceed 400 bhp.

My first experience of the O series was back in the late 1970s; a 2000HL Princess. Remember the Wedge shape? Liked it from day one! The O series engine, in all it's various forms has a strong following with enthusiasts and around 25 years later, I'm still one of them... particularly in turbocharged form...
Old 30 October 2003, 08:58 PM
  #16  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

I'm encouraged to hear that the bottom ends are strong. Our start-point is an overbored 1800cc B-series engine (to 1950cc). It's had some headwork, so that's what we'd like to stick with. However, I'd like to hear more about the fuelling on the turbocharged B- and O-series. Especially those run on carbs.
Old 30 October 2003, 10:25 PM
  #17  
MGJohn
Scooby Regular
 
MGJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Production turbo-charged O series engines were all single carb ones. The later M16 and T16 variants were fuel injected. Why not post your queries here on these sites where there's a wealth of such information and knowledge:

http://www2.mgcars.org.uk/cgi-bin/gen5?runprog=mgbbs&access=41730134504047&mode=tlis t&subject=71

http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=1

Good luck with the project.
Old 31 October 2003, 02:13 PM
  #18  
Dr Hu
Scooby Regular
 
Dr Hu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 2,830
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
Post

As someone else posted earlier, you need a 'sealed' SU carb..... They had to make one specially for the MG Metro Turbo. The std SU's wont work properly as they rely on the Vacuum effect to lift the pistons, obviously as the turbo boosts you lose vacuum and go positive pressure.

They do work, but it has to be the special type.
Old 31 October 2003, 03:45 PM
  #19  
misty
Scooby Regular
 
misty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: astra 1.9ctdi with dtuk green box. 195/300
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

MGJohn. The bottom ends were very robust, but I seem to remember the oil feed to the cam shaft was very close to the end of the head gasket. Hence a lot of these engines wept oil from the right hand side of the cylinder head, which always needed a gasket change to cure!
dave
Old 31 October 2003, 05:35 PM
  #20  
MGJohn
Scooby Regular
 
MGJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Misty Dave - true.... puzzles me why some engines are as dry as a bone there whilst others do leak but usually it's only a weep. I have two O series Turbos and one T16 Turbo which are tight as a .... there. Another leaked copiously - well a steady weep which was more unsightly than a problem because it was particularly noticeable in an otherwise spotless engine compartment. I didn't bother changing the gasket as the rest of the unit was fine. If it aint really broke ... Careful fitment of later spec head gaskets are the answer for this apparently...

Dr Hu is correct. Whilst outwardly similar to N/A SUs, the Turbo SUs are of special design for the turbocharging applications. Those early Montego Turbos are great fun to drive and still of reasonable performance by modern day standards despite being in their 19th year now.... There's still a good few about.
Old 31 October 2003, 05:41 PM
  #21  
misty
Scooby Regular
 
misty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: astra 1.9ctdi with dtuk green box. 195/300
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Yes as you say, my Montego wept oil for two years, but I just used to wipe it once a week. My turbo 420gsi (t16) was as dry as a nuns c*nt though!
dave
Old 31 October 2003, 05:47 PM
  #22  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks for the tips, gents. I'll look out for the carb from an early Montego Turbo or a Metro Turbo.
Old 31 October 2003, 05:50 PM
  #23  
MGJohn
Scooby Regular
 
MGJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Fatman ....Back on thread:

See following updated post ...

[Edited by MGJohn - 10/31/2003 5:58:20 PM]
Old 31 October 2003, 05:53 PM
  #24  
MGJohn
Scooby Regular
 
MGJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Fatman ....Back on thread:

>>The BGT uses a compression ratio of ~9.5:1, so we're considering dropping that a little by use of a thick 'spacer' gasket. This is to avoid expense of new rods. Hopefully the head studs are long enough (or cheap enough if the OEs are too short).<<

You're wise to reduce that CR. The old B series was prone to pink (pre-ign) even in mildly tuned N/A form. I know of one N/A O series EFi car converted to turbo use without lowering the ~9.0:1 compression ratio, but, to avoid melting the N/A pistons, was run on low boosts quite effectively. In any event, the owner was not too worried on that score, O series EFi engines are easy and inexpensive to obtain from breakers should he overdo the boost one day ...

Turbo O series engines have higher spec pistons of German origin IIRC - Mahle? - with compression ratios ~7.5/8.0:1. i.e. considerably lower than 9.5:1 ..

Also WROTE:

>>What about the Maestro Turbo...?

Did they use carbs or fuel injection? ...... CARB
Did they use an intercooler<<............... YES

NOTE:

Montego/Maestro Turbo SU carbs are fairly easy to obtain. Their essential plenums are like the proverbial .... because Mini enthusiasts put Metro Turbo engines in their car conversions but then need the lower angled Montego plenum and outlet because of clearance problems..... one tatty looking Montego plenum went on ebay recently for over 50 quid. Might be expedient to cheaply pick up an old Montego Turbo MoT failure (ensure car/engine is complete) and get all the bits you need from it.

[Edited by MGJohn - 10/31/2003 6:04:48 PM]
Old 31 October 2003, 05:59 PM
  #25  
Fatman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Did the carb-fed Montego Turbo use an intercooler?
Old 31 October 2003, 06:07 PM
  #26  
MGJohn
Scooby Regular
 
MGJohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Yes, I have a couple of spares if you can't get fixed up locally ...
Old 01 November 2003, 11:51 AM
  #27  
Scooby96
Scooby Regular
 
Scooby96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Why not stick in the Rover V8 mentioned above and turbo or supercharge that?!?!?!?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
piravlos
Drivetrain
9
02 April 2002 12:23 AM
pob on the job
General Technical
5
09 December 2001 02:32 PM
waynos
ScoobyNet General
5
17 July 2000 05:44 PM



Quick Reply: Turbocharged MG BGT



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 PM.