Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

New (2002) shape Jeep Cherokee - Anyone got one or driven one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 June 2002, 07:45 PM
  #1  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Quite fancy one of these, Had a Grand Cherokee 4.0L on hire in the states ifor a week and loved it.

Anyone driven the 2.5TD?

Many thanks

Paul
Old 18 June 2002, 10:00 AM
  #2  
TaviaRS
Scooby Regular
 
TaviaRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: a land full of corsets
Posts: 9,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Friend of mine gets his this thursday. Its the 2.5 TD one. I'll let you know when I've been in it.
Old 18 June 2002, 10:32 AM
  #3  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

TaviaRS

Many thanks, please do just that.

Paul
Old 18 June 2002, 10:34 AM
  #4  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Number plate position looks crap on the back (it's a long one across the spare wheel, instead of a square one on the bodywork).

I think the 'Sport' version (with the black bumpers) looks better than the 'Limited' version. The 2.4 petrol is supposed to be crap, but the 2.5D does about 35mpg. 3.7 V6 looks nice if you can afford to run it. Actually, I think with these sort of cars you should really have a diesel anyway.
Old 18 June 2002, 11:32 AM
  #5  
alistair
Scooby Senior
 
alistair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Actually, I think with these sort of cars you should really have a diesel anyway.
Why? My wife has a Grand Cherokee 4.7 V8 and IMHO it's loads better than the diesel quicker and quieter is worth the extra running cost - well it is to me.
Old 18 June 2002, 12:00 PM
  #6  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Because the torque characteristics of a diesel suit mud-plugging better. Of course, most people never do any mud-plugging with a 4x4 anyway
Old 18 June 2002, 01:16 PM
  #7  
alistair
Scooby Senior
 
alistair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It's not all about mud plugging - mine's for towing a boat and getting it out of the water up a wet slip road. So mostly on road use and an occasional requirement for ground clearance and 4wd.

I bought the V8 as it has a better 4wd system than the 4.0 - it will actually lock up all 3 diffs fully. For what I do 4wd is a bit like ABS - I don't need it 99% of the time, but when I do, I really do - coz it means I'm stuck on a beach with a tide coming in.......

Used to have a modified Landrover for playing in the mud but you can't do much in anything that you care too much about - the landie didn't have a straight panel on it.
Old 18 June 2002, 01:22 PM
  #8  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hang on, you can't get a new Cherokee V8. Do you mean Grand Cherokee?
Old 18 June 2002, 02:17 PM
  #9  
alistair
Scooby Senior
 
alistair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

That's what I put in my original reply

Sorry - dragging this thread off at a bit of a tangent.......
Old 18 June 2002, 02:17 PM
  #10  
PAUL GEE
Scooby Regular
 
PAUL GEE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Paul,
I bought one just before Christmas last year. Black Limited Diesel with all the bits. Heated leather seats Brushed Steel odds and sods. They look really chunky and macho - but the missus and me couldn't get on with it. I eventually sold the thing around March of this year. I can't say I was sorry to see her go!
I have to admit when I see one on the road I still really like the look and the idea of one.
However, the reality of owning one didn't quite live up to my expectations. Perhaps if I'd bought the petrol version I would still have it. At low revs pulling out of junctions it was so sluggish it was positively dangerous, I kid you not!!
Regards Paul.
Old 18 June 2002, 06:04 PM
  #11  
GavinP
Scooby Regular
 
GavinP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Petrol with a LPG conversion ?
Old 18 June 2002, 06:07 PM
  #12  
carl
Scooby Regular
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

www.startech.de
Old 18 June 2002, 08:50 PM
  #13  
neilbbb
Scooby Regular
 
neilbbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

got an old shape td 2.5 from last year, well impressed
Old 18 June 2002, 09:04 PM
  #14  
alistair
Scooby Senior
 
alistair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

The petrol Grand is as quick as a Scoob out of junctions.

Why not just go down to your local Jeep dealer and test drive one ?
Old 19 June 2002, 11:34 AM
  #15  
Luke
BANNED
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Come on be real they are rubbish... Interior must be by "Ikea"

Ask Americans what they think of them................ Not much.
Old 19 June 2002, 12:01 PM
  #16  
alistair
Scooby Senior
 
alistair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

A scoob owner slagging off an interior

What do most people think of Scoobies - doesn't make then correct !

IMHO the Jeep is good - if you want that sort of thing. If you want a performance car then yes it's crap.
Old 19 June 2002, 12:20 PM
  #17  
PAUL GEE
Scooby Regular
 
PAUL GEE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

In the Jeeps defence.....it's far from crap!!
I thought the whole package was pretty damn good.
After performance cars of one type or another (at the time) it was too big a change for me.
Certainly NOT crap tho'.
P.G.
Old 20 June 2002, 05:21 PM
  #18  
beefola
Scooby Regular
 
beefola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Well, i've driven a nw 3.7 and i thought it was wicked. Goes really well (comparatively), doesn't handle too bad (comparatively), and the interior's quite nice (comparatively).
Just a pity that over the 10 mile test route it used about a quarter of a tank of peccy...
Old 20 June 2002, 05:41 PM
  #19  
alistair
Scooby Senior
 
alistair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

I didn't realise that the tank was that small

We've averaged 15mpg in a 4.7 Grand - which is only slightly worse than my STi
Old 22 June 2002, 07:08 PM
  #20  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Chaps

Thanks for your input

I gonna try one next week

Paul
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
the shreksta
Other Marques
26
01 October 2015 02:30 PM
Flat4x4-again
General Technical
2
29 September 2015 06:32 PM
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
28 September 2015 07:05 AM



Quick Reply: New (2002) shape Jeep Cherokee - Anyone got one or driven one?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 PM.