Free School Meals for 5,6 & 7 Year Olds
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
The food at my Primary school was so crap you couldn't give it away.
They didn't have anyone qualified to cook, so the food was cooked at another school and brought in and kept warm. Food was therefore either luke warm slop or hot semi-cremated and rock hard.
And if you didn't have enough on your plate, the dinner ladies would force to have more and wouldn't let you leave until you had eaten it all (although eating rock solid roast potatoes was impossible...couldn't even stab it with a fork! )
I'm retchting just thinking of it.
Hopefully its a bit better these days.
They didn't have anyone qualified to cook, so the food was cooked at another school and brought in and kept warm. Food was therefore either luke warm slop or hot semi-cremated and rock hard.
And if you didn't have enough on your plate, the dinner ladies would force to have more and wouldn't let you leave until you had eaten it all (although eating rock solid roast potatoes was impossible...couldn't even stab it with a fork! )
I'm retchting just thinking of it.
Hopefully its a bit better these days.
Last edited by ALi-B; 17 September 2013 at 07:18 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
Last edited by zip106; 17 September 2013 at 07:30 PM.
#12
Obviously a vote buying exercise, but I am glad to see it is not means-tested.
- People with means aren't necessarily well equipped to provide good meals for their kids, if their own food education is poor.
- It makes no distinction between the backgrounds of kids, so there is no stigma or division between them, it's too early an age to start classifying kids in this way.
- School meals *could* be more nutritious than the average packed lunch.
- Frees up time and money for all parents.
With that said, I'm sure we could do something better with this money, like plugging the multi-billion black hole in the public finances.
- People with means aren't necessarily well equipped to provide good meals for their kids, if their own food education is poor.
- It makes no distinction between the backgrounds of kids, so there is no stigma or division between them, it's too early an age to start classifying kids in this way.
- School meals *could* be more nutritious than the average packed lunch.
- Frees up time and money for all parents.
With that said, I'm sure we could do something better with this money, like plugging the multi-billion black hole in the public finances.
Last edited by ReallyReallyGoodMeat; 17 September 2013 at 07:46 PM.
#13
I had free meals at school - didn't make me feel inferior to those that didn't.
I really don't see an issue.
Just the bloody hand-ringing Liberals thinking they know what's best for all of us.
I really don't see an issue.
Just the bloody hand-ringing Liberals thinking they know what's best for all of us.
#14
Nobody knows at school who is on free meals, it's highly confidential so as to reduce stigma.......
Not sure what to think of it. That money would bring back free eye tests and free dental checkups plus some treatments. However that would make redundant a pile of people who currently work the means tests for dental / eye checks.
Money spent on school meals will increase employment.....
Shame my mob are to old
Shaun
Not sure what to think of it. That money would bring back free eye tests and free dental checkups plus some treatments. However that would make redundant a pile of people who currently work the means tests for dental / eye checks.
Money spent on school meals will increase employment.....
Shame my mob are to old
Shaun
#15
#16
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
And?
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And?
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
This was the output of a comprehensive review, so it didn't come out of nowhere. I believe the authors of the report wanted to go much further.
I think it's a great idea, even though my kids our now too old to get the benefit
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
great idea only problem is they won't be hungry at tea time, i once asked at my kids school. IF THE LOCAL COUNCIL PROUDLY BOAST'S THEY SPEND 80PENCE ON A KIDS SCHOOL DINER, HOW COME THEY ARE £2.30 FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO PAY. needless to say i didn't get a answer and when i sugested is it because we are paying for all those that get freebies supprise supprise no answer again
#20
It's the parents hands they're holding.
My kids couldn't care less if they have a school dinner or a packed lunch each day.
If there was a real issue then this would have been implemented many, many years ago.
Like when the country could actually afford it.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think school meals are absolutely critical and welcome this new policy.
Kids eat school meals properly; they don't with packed lunches and it encourages mealtime faffing. With a boy of nearly 5 and a girl of two, I'm pleased.
Kids eat school meals properly; they don't with packed lunches and it encourages mealtime faffing. With a boy of nearly 5 and a girl of two, I'm pleased.
#27
Let's rephrase that post.
Why would anyone want the government (by definition - provider of second rate services) to supply something as important as food to someone as important as their own children when they can do the job themselves?
Nanny state mind set anyone?
Why would anyone want the government (by definition - provider of second rate services) to supply something as important as food to someone as important as their own children when they can do the job themselves?
Nanny state mind set anyone?
#29
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
And?
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
What galls me is that, in future years, it will go down as part of the education budget, as in, "we have spent x billion pounds more on education..."
Rubbish.
I remember my dad, a fearsome secondary school deputy head once saying to a parents' meeting, "Do you realise that your children are eating the equivalent of four teachers a year?"
And that only referred to SUBSIDISED meals, let alone free ones.
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: St Helens
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And?
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.
I also work and pay tax.
As does my wife.
I'd prefer the money saved by NOT giving food away to those who can afford it, be used to update buildings for a better learning environment, better reading books, more lunchtime/after school activities and more importantly more teachers.
So many schools are having funding for teachers cut and are having to put different age years together in the same class.
Another stupid idea.
Free school meals for those that need it was around when I was at primary school 40 years ago - it worked well then, why not now?
Just more nannying to try and win fvcking votes.
Utter cvnts.