Organic food racket
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
Organic food racket
Just seen price of romaine lettuce, ordinary 1pound, organic 2pound
That's just absurd isn't?
The implication is that one has never seen soil and the other enjoys its own 10 acre garden
Which I'm damn sure isn't true
That's just absurd isn't?
The implication is that one has never seen soil and the other enjoys its own 10 acre garden
Which I'm damn sure isn't true
#5
I only buy organic. If it really is organic I don't mind the extra price. Are some here saying that organic stuff in the shops isn't actually organic? Surely it has to meet some criteria?
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 535D M-Sport Touring
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saw a program exposing scams where someone was buying gallon drums of the cheapest olive oil, wacking it a fancy bottle and labeling as Extra Virgin, organic, etc. Flogging it on a market stall for many times what they originally paid for it. Why didn't I think of that?
Aside from the risk of going to gaol of course
Aside from the risk of going to gaol of course
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dl
#11
I find the term 'organic' not convincing regardless of the conception of a farm as organism (ref: Northbourne, 1939). Although I'm aware of the meaning in vogue, my unconscious thought upon reading 'organic' term on any food gives me the impression that it must have something to do with dead creatures' organs. Even when I'm a meat eater, I find this term a bit grim. IMO this term should be changed to 'natural' or something like that.
Once in Oxfam conference one veteran campaigner was giving a talk on Fair Trade to a few hundred people. Her slip of a tongue caused her to refer organic Maya Gold and St. Lucia bananas as orgasmic instead. I knew one day, someone would do that by mistake. It happened, and by God, the laughter from the crowd was deafening. She left soon after her speech without eating any organic lunch.
Once in Oxfam conference one veteran campaigner was giving a talk on Fair Trade to a few hundred people. Her slip of a tongue caused her to refer organic Maya Gold and St. Lucia bananas as orgasmic instead. I knew one day, someone would do that by mistake. It happened, and by God, the laughter from the crowd was deafening. She left soon after her speech without eating any organic lunch.
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If organic is so good, why isn't all food produced organically only? They would sell more and bring prices down, then you could create a new market for chemically enhanced food.
What about 'Free-Range'? is that a rip off too?
What about 'Free-Range'? is that a rip off too?
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
If they can sell it for double then I can see being possible!
I understood organic meant fewer chemicals more space,actual soil. And free range the same. All if which costs more to produce
I understood organic meant fewer chemicals more space,actual soil. And free range the same. All if which costs more to produce
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Proper organic farming is a complete PITA compared to intensive methods and is worth the outlay where traceability is clear.
We get an organic Riverford veg box and fruit bag each week - been doing so for about seven years now. Always good.
We get an organic Riverford veg box and fruit bag each week - been doing so for about seven years now. Always good.
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Outrageous comment.
In chickens, the difference between free range and birds living in "enriched cages" is massive. To be honest, the word "enriched" is a load of crap anyway because they are still cages and not a big difference to the old style battery cages. If the public could see these "enriched cages" I could bet you the market would be dead for any type of caged production (other than the people who really don't give a toss about where their food comes from).
The difference with organic and free range is that with organic you're not allowed to stock as many birds per metre square. Who's going to stop farmers buying extra birds on the side and putting them in the shed? For organic you're also not allowed to use any chemicals or pesticides. Think of the fly problem inside chicken sheds in the summer? For organic farmers this would be a nightmare but I bet you some will do fly spraying regardless to keep the flies down. Then there's spraying in the fields to keep the weeds down. I'll also tell you that currently free range is making more money than organic because the public don't want to pay an even higher price.
Then there's the different types of free range. If you go to Tesco or Asda to buy your free range eggs, those eggs have come from huge flocks of chickens in excess of 16,000 birds. If you buy free range eggs from Waitrose, those eggs have come from flocks no larger than 4,000 birds. It's all to do with welfare and standards. Having smaller flocks of chickens is harder work because you need more individual sheds and it involves more management compared to one massive shed. That's why there's a premium price for Waitrose eggs, and the biggest profit margins.
In chickens, the difference between free range and birds living in "enriched cages" is massive. To be honest, the word "enriched" is a load of crap anyway because they are still cages and not a big difference to the old style battery cages. If the public could see these "enriched cages" I could bet you the market would be dead for any type of caged production (other than the people who really don't give a toss about where their food comes from).
The difference with organic and free range is that with organic you're not allowed to stock as many birds per metre square. Who's going to stop farmers buying extra birds on the side and putting them in the shed? For organic you're also not allowed to use any chemicals or pesticides. Think of the fly problem inside chicken sheds in the summer? For organic farmers this would be a nightmare but I bet you some will do fly spraying regardless to keep the flies down. Then there's spraying in the fields to keep the weeds down. I'll also tell you that currently free range is making more money than organic because the public don't want to pay an even higher price.
Then there's the different types of free range. If you go to Tesco or Asda to buy your free range eggs, those eggs have come from huge flocks of chickens in excess of 16,000 birds. If you buy free range eggs from Waitrose, those eggs have come from flocks no larger than 4,000 birds. It's all to do with welfare and standards. Having smaller flocks of chickens is harder work because you need more individual sheds and it involves more management compared to one massive shed. That's why there's a premium price for Waitrose eggs, and the biggest profit margins.
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Enriched cages are bigger (slightly) than the old style battery cages, plus the enriched cages have a "scratch area" and a small perching pole. Regardless though, they're still locked in a cage until their time comes and have limited space.
All chickens producing eggs for food, whether it be low-end supermarkets or top-end, cages, free range, or organic, the cut off point of their life is 72 weeks of age. The reason is because this is regarded when the quality of the egg gets too poor to sell in stores (egg quality decreases as the birds get older). They will then be used in processed meat.
Oh and also, you can get "enriched caged" sheds with flocks of chickens in excess of 120,000+ birds. Compare that to Waitrose free range flocks of a maximum of 4,000 birds.... Totally different systems, management and welfare issues.
All chickens producing eggs for food, whether it be low-end supermarkets or top-end, cages, free range, or organic, the cut off point of their life is 72 weeks of age. The reason is because this is regarded when the quality of the egg gets too poor to sell in stores (egg quality decreases as the birds get older). They will then be used in processed meat.
Oh and also, you can get "enriched caged" sheds with flocks of chickens in excess of 120,000+ birds. Compare that to Waitrose free range flocks of a maximum of 4,000 birds.... Totally different systems, management and welfare issues.
Last edited by LSherratt; 24 July 2013 at 01:47 PM.
#28
I understand why some people think it is a scam. But I think Riverford/Abel and Cole etc are the way to go. It seems more strange that people DON'T eat organic unless they really can't afford it.
Same argument regarding drinking/eating dairy products - who thought of that idea??!
Same argument regarding drinking/eating dairy products - who thought of that idea??!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MH-Racing
Subaru Parts
18
18 October 2015 04:49 PM
johnfelstead
ScoobyNet General
27
26 February 2001 05:48 PM