Teresa May Ruffles Some Feathers
02 October 2011, 11:16 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Teresa May Ruffles Some Feathers
02 October 2011, 12:33 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd support getting rid of it and replacing it with a British bill of rights.
Some of my issues are:
Euro human rights acts was never voted for by us and often overrides acts passed by our parliament.
Dreadful interpretation of it by the courts.
Any rights should be based upon 'natural rights' only like the US constitution, not some welfare manifesto like you have a right to healthcare, education, disability etc. 'Rights' to education should be part of education legislation only.
Too often the human rights act is a lawyers and criminals charter, such as you can't deport people because they have a 'right to a family life', or put them in jail. It's absolutely stupid.
It's so upside down, we lack the 'natural rights' to certain privacy things in this country, free travel and assembly etc thanks to terrorist laws and ANPR, but we have a 'right to a family life'.
Natural rights gauranteed first and foremost!
Natural rights LIMIT government, other human rights go further and EXPAND government. The Euro human rights acts is very much the latter.
Some of my issues are:
Euro human rights acts was never voted for by us and often overrides acts passed by our parliament.
Dreadful interpretation of it by the courts.
Any rights should be based upon 'natural rights' only like the US constitution, not some welfare manifesto like you have a right to healthcare, education, disability etc. 'Rights' to education should be part of education legislation only.
Too often the human rights act is a lawyers and criminals charter, such as you can't deport people because they have a 'right to a family life', or put them in jail. It's absolutely stupid.
It's so upside down, we lack the 'natural rights' to certain privacy things in this country, free travel and assembly etc thanks to terrorist laws and ANPR, but we have a 'right to a family life'.
Natural rights gauranteed first and foremost!
Natural rights LIMIT government, other human rights go further and EXPAND government. The Euro human rights acts is very much the latter.
02 October 2011, 01:09 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wouldn't believe a thing that b***h says, cause firstly she's a politician and secondly I fail to even think for one nanosecond this will happen. She's leid far too much over the Police reforms for me to think anything coming out of her mouth isn't BS
02 October 2011, 04:49 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw a Human Rights/QC/Barrister;Lawer type person interviewed on Sky news urging May to resign as Home Secretary because of these comments.
He would say that because he's probably got both front feet in the human rights trough coining it in!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He would say that because he's probably got both front feet in the human rights trough coining it in!!!!!!!!!!!!!
02 October 2011, 05:02 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lawyers' would support any legal system which has need for many Lawyers!
Trending Topics
02 October 2011, 07:38 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
But Theresa May told the Sunday Telegraph she "personally" would like to see it go because of the problems it caused for the Home Office.
Dave
02 October 2011, 08:20 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 October 2011, 09:54 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 October 2011, 12:43 PM
#18
Pontificating
04 October 2011, 12:09 PM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About time that the Conservatives asserted themselves in accordance with their share of the vote and said what's what!
If the Lib/dems forced another election I reckon they must know that they would effectively disappear from public life.
Les
If the Lib/dems forced another election I reckon they must know that they would effectively disappear from public life.
Les
04 October 2011, 12:17 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
I'd support getting rid of it and replacing it with a British bill of rights.
Some of my issues are:
Euro human rights acts was never voted for by us and often overrides acts passed by our parliament.
Dreadful interpretation of it by the courts.
Any rights should be based upon 'natural rights' only like the US constitution, not some welfare manifesto like you have a right to healthcare, education, disability etc. 'Rights' to education should be part of education legislation only.
Too often the human rights act is a lawyers and criminals charter, such as you can't deport people because they have a 'right to a family life', or put them in jail. It's absolutely stupid.
It's so upside down, we lack the 'natural rights' to certain privacy things in this country, free travel and assembly etc thanks to terrorist laws and ANPR, but we have a 'right to a family life'.
Natural rights gauranteed first and foremost!
Natural rights LIMIT government, other human rights go further and EXPAND government. The Euro human rights acts is very much the latter.
Some of my issues are:
Euro human rights acts was never voted for by us and often overrides acts passed by our parliament.
Dreadful interpretation of it by the courts.
Any rights should be based upon 'natural rights' only like the US constitution, not some welfare manifesto like you have a right to healthcare, education, disability etc. 'Rights' to education should be part of education legislation only.
Too often the human rights act is a lawyers and criminals charter, such as you can't deport people because they have a 'right to a family life', or put them in jail. It's absolutely stupid.
It's so upside down, we lack the 'natural rights' to certain privacy things in this country, free travel and assembly etc thanks to terrorist laws and ANPR, but we have a 'right to a family life'.
Natural rights gauranteed first and foremost!
Natural rights LIMIT government, other human rights go further and EXPAND government. The Euro human rights acts is very much the latter.
04 October 2011, 12:32 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Britain never needed this. The developed world didn't, and the countries that might need it just ignore anyway. In other words, it's completely pointless.
04 October 2011, 02:16 PM
#23
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post