Ed Milliband out of his depth...
20 October 2010, 01:29 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northwest
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He really can't be the best they have to offer?? Reminds me of when Tony Adams was portsmouth manager, you know the outcome it's just a question of when.
20 October 2010, 01:57 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northwest
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am helping SN to make cuts. By not posting in and the subsequent removal of the 'Non Scooby Related' section SN will be able to save money. Too much waste has been going on at central office (probably someone's bedroom). SN have increased taxation via their stickers over several years, rises way above the rate of inflation have also been applied to their yearly subscriptions. It is not fair that we, the members, should have to be burdened with the cost of overpaid moderators (the pubic sector) and SN's reckless borrowing.
Trending Topics
20 October 2010, 02:06 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: llanelli, boyo
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am helping SN to make cuts. By not posting in and the subsequent removal of the 'Non Scooby Related' section SN will be able to save money. Too much waste has been going on at central office (probably someone's bedroom). SN have increased taxation via their stickers over several years, rises way above the rate of inflation have also been applied to their yearly subscriptions. It is not fair that we, the members, should have to be burdened with the cost of overpaid moderators (the pubic sector) and SN's reckless borrowing.
thats funny. i loves it!!
20 October 2010, 02:35 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am helping SN to make cuts. By not posting in and the subsequent removal of the 'Non Scooby Related' section SN will be able to save money. Too much waste has been going on at central office (probably someone's bedroom). SN have increased taxation via their stickers over several years, rises way above the rate of inflation have also been applied to their yearly subscriptions. It is not fair that we, the members, should have to be burdened with the cost of overpaid moderators (the pubic sector) and SN's reckless borrowing.
20 October 2010, 04:34 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
I got banned for making a dick out of an uppety moderater over on an alfa forum a week or 2 after paying around £30 membership. The ban was for 6 weeks(I think) as per the sites terms and agreements which is fair enough, after that period they just banned me for life. I gave them hell for months over the money but never got a refund.
so to sum up Alfaowner.com is run by ****s and fannys!
so to sum up Alfaowner.com is run by ****s and fannys!
20 October 2010, 05:35 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northwest
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got banned for making a dick out of an uppety moderater over on an alfa forum a week or 2 after paying around £30 membership. The ban was for 6 weeks(I think) as per the sites terms and agreements which is fair enough, after that period they just banned me for life. I gave them hell for months over the money but never got a refund.
so to sum up Alfaowner.com is run by ****s and fannys!
so to sum up Alfaowner.com is run by ****s and fannys!
Tell you what, one more outburst like that and you'll be history on here mate, guarantee it!
20 October 2010, 08:34 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: There on the stair
Posts: 10,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am helping SN to make cuts. By not posting in and the subsequent removal of the 'Non Scooby Related' section SN will be able to save money. Too much waste has been going on at central office (probably someone's bedroom). SN have increased taxation via their stickers over several years, rises way above the rate of inflation have also been applied to their yearly subscriptions. It is not fair that we, the members, should have to be burdened with the cost of overpaid moderators (the pubic sector) and SN's reckless borrowing.
Errr....
22 October 2010, 03:46 PM
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
22 October 2010, 03:49 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As well as referring to Osbourne as the shadow chancellor, and trying to snipe about the absence of a cabinet member from the house, only to realise he was in fact there.
22 October 2010, 03:57 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northwest
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sitting between alan johnson and harriet harman made it look like he'd brought his mum and dad along. will be interesting to see how long labour stick with him, they certainly won't make the same mistake again of not sacking an unelectable leader (u think so at least, maybe, ok possibly...)